L. Tuen Mun District - 196 - L. Tuen Mun District Appendix II - L Tuen Mun District Summaries of Written/Oral Representations Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O 1 All 1 - Supports the provisional The supporting view is noted. DCCAs recommendations on all DCCAs of the Tuen Mun District. 2 L01– 1 - Holds no objection to the The view is noted. Tuen provisional recommendations. Mun Town Centre 3 L01 – 1 - (a) Proposes to re-delineate the Item (a) Tuen DCCAs of the Tuen Mun This proposal is not accepted Mun District so as to improve the because: Town population deviation and Centre community integrity of (i) according to the proposal Tuen Mun Town Centre made in the representation, L02 – and southeastern part of the population of L02 (Siu Siu Chi Tuen Mun. Details are as Chi) (21 669) will exceed follows: the statutory permissible L03 – upper limit (+30.54%); and On Ting transfers Villa Tiara from L01 (Tuen Mun Town (ii)the populations of L02 (Siu L04 – Centre) to L02 (Siu Chi); Chi), L03 (On Ting), L04 Siu Tsui (Siu Tsui), L05 (Yau Oi transfers Siu On Court South) and L06 (Yau Oi L05 – from L02 (Siu Chi) to North) will fall within the Yau Oi L03 (On Ting) and then statutory permissible range. South transfers Siu Lun Court According to the established from the latter to L04 working principles, L06 – (Siu Tsui); adjustments to their existing Yau Oi boundaries are not required. North transfers Oceania Heights from L06 (Yau Oi North) to L04 (Siu * W: Number of written representations. O : Number of oral representations. L. Tuen Mun District - 197 - L. Tuen Mun District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O L07 – Tsui) so that the latter Tsui will comprise the entire Hing Siu Lun Court, Oceania Heights and Nerine L08 – Cove; and Shan King adjusts the boundaries of L05 (Yau Oi South) and L09 – L06 (Yau Oi North) so King that these two DCCAs Hing will comprise Tsui Ning Garden in L04 (Siu L10 – Tsui), part of Yau Oi Hing Estate in L05 (Yau Oi Tsak South), part of Yau Oi Estate in L06 (Yau Oi L11 – North) and Goodview San Hui Garden. L15 – (b) Objects to the provisional Item (b) Yuet recommendations on This proposal is not accepted Wu dividing Shan King Estate because the populations of L07 into L08 (Shan King) and (Tsui Hing), L08 (Shan King), L16 – L09 (King Hing), and Tai L09 (King Hing), L10 (Hing Siu Hei Hing Estate into L09 (King Tsak), L15 (Yuet Wu), L16 (Siu Hing) and L10 (Hing Tsak). Hei), L17 (Wu King), L20 (Lok L17 – Considers that Tsui) and L21 (Lung Mun) will Wu re-delineation of the fall within the statutory King DCCAs concerned can permissible range. According rectify the above situation to the established working L20 – and the problem of having a principles, adjustments to their Lok relatively large population existing boundaries are not Tsui in L11 (San Hui). Details required. of the proposals are as L21 – follows: Lung Mun deletes L16 (Siu Hei) so as to free up a DCCA for the creation of a new DCCA in the area of Tai Hing Estate. The name of the new DCCA is “Tai Hing”; L. Tuen Mun District - 198 - L. Tuen Mun District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O transfers Siu Hei Court and Miami Beach Towers from L16 (Siu Hei) to L17 (Wu King) and L20 (Lok Tsui) respectively, and Marina Garden to L15 (Yuet Wu); transfers the area in the west of Lung Mun Road in L20 (Lok Tsui) (including Lung Kwu Tan), and the areas in the north of Wong Chu Road and in the west of Lung Mun Road in L21 (Lung Mun) to L08 (Shan King); transfers some of the buildings in L08 (Shan King) to L09 (King Hing) so that the latter will only include Shan King Estate and renames it as “Shan King North”. For L08 (Shan King), renames it as “Shan King South & Castle Peak”; and transfers Chelsea Heights in L07 (Tsui Hing) and the area of Choy Yee Bridge in L11 (San Hui) to L10 (Hing Tsak). Renames L10 (Hing Tsak) as “Choy Yee Bridge”. L. Tuen Mun District - 199 - L. Tuen Mun District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O 4 L01 – 1 - (a) Objects to the transfer of Item (a) Tuen the area of Ming Ngai This proposal is not accepted Mun Street to L11 (San Hui), and because: Town requests that the original Centre boundary of L01 (Tuen (i) based on the 2015 original Mun Town Centre) be DCCA boundary, the L11 – remained unchanged. population of L01 (Tuen San Hui Reasons are as follows: Mun Town Centre) (20 982) will exceed the statutory L15 – people living in Ming permissible upper limit Yuet Ngai Street, Lee Yuen (+26.41%). In order to Wu Mansion and Mai Kei maintain the population of Building are long-time the DCCA within the L16 – residents who have statutory permissible range, Siu Hei developed strong some buildings in the emotional bonds with DCCA must be transferred L17 – L01 (Tuen Mun Town to the adjacent DCCA; and Wu Centre); King (ii)the delineation in terms of district and recommendations must be street management, based on objective data of transferring the street to population distribution. L11 (San Hui) is Arrangements on district strange and administration matters or incongruous; community services provided by DC members retaining the street in are not the relevant factors L01 (Tuen Mun Town of consideration. Centre) will not have any impact on the population distribution of Tuen Mun Town Centre as the population therein is not large. In addition, even if there is an increase in the population of L01 (Tuen Mun Town Centre), it will only increase the workload of the DC member concerned but will have L. Tuen Mun District - 200 - L. Tuen Mun District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O no impact on the entire Tuen Mun District; and the delineation criteria disregard the overall planning of the area and the wishes of the residents. Delineation of DCCAs should not be decided rigidly on the basis of population quota, but the district as a whole. (b) The total population of the Item (b) three DCCAs, namely L15 This proposal is not accepted (Yuet Wu), L16 (Siu Hei) because the populations of L15 and L17 (Wu King) is (Yuet Wu), L16 (Siu Hei) and 39 406. They should be L17 (Wu King) will fall within grouped into two DCCAs. the statutory permissible range. According to the established working principles, adjustments to their existing boundaries are not required. 5 L02 – 1 - To ensure local integrity and This proposal is not accepted Siu Chi from a long term perspective, because the populations of L02 proposes to: (Siu Chi), L03 (On Ting), L04 L03 – (Siu Tsui), L05 (Yau Oi South) On Ting transfer Siu On Court from and L06 (Yau Oi North) will L02 (Siu Chi), where the fall within the statutory L04 – population is higher than the permissible range. Siu Tsui population quota by about According to the established 20%, to L03 (On Ting); working principles, adjustments L05 – to their existing boundaries are Yau Oi transfer part of Siu Lun not required. South Court from L03 (On Ting) to L04 (Siu Tsui); L06 – Yau Oi transfer Tsui Ning Garden North from L04 (Siu Tsui) to L06 (Yau Oi North); and L. Tuen Mun District - 201 - L. Tuen Mun District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O transfer Oi Ming House and Oi Hei House from L06 (Yau Oi North) to L05 (Yau Oi South). 6 L07 – 1 - Supports the provisional The supporting view is noted. Tsui recommendations. Hing L12– So Kwun Wat L25 – Po Tin L28 – Yan Tin 7 L12 – - 1 Agrees to create new DCCAs in The supporting view is noted. So the areas of So Kwun Wat and Kwun Yan Tin Estate. Wat L28 – Yan Tin 8 L12 – 7 - (a) One representation supports Item (a) So the provisional The supporting view is noted. Kwun recommendations on L14 Wat (Hanford). L13 – (b) Three representations Item (b) Sam propose to transfer Aegean These proposals are not Shing Coast from L14 (Hanford) accepted because according to to L12 (So Kwun Wat) as the proposal made in the L14 – Aegean Coast is representations, the population Hanford geographically situated in of L14 (Hanford) (10 095) will So Kwun Wat. be below the statutory permissible lower limit (-39.18%). L. Tuen Mun District - 202 - L. Tuen Mun District Item No.* DCCAs Representations EAC’s Views No. W O (c) One representation Item (c) proposes to transfer The This proposal is not accepted Bloomsway from L12 (So because if The Bloomsway is Kwun Wat) to L14 transferred from L12 (So Kwun (Hanford) as the housing Wat) to L14 (Hanford), the estate is geographically population of L12 (So Kwun closer to L14 (Hanford). Wat) (11 561) will be below the If the proposal will result in statutory permissible lower an insufficient population in limit (-30.35%). If Aegean L12 (So Kwun Wat), then Coast is also transferred from transfer Aegean Coast from L14 (Hanford) to L12 (So L14 (Hanford) to L12 (So Kwun Wat), the population of Kwun Wat). L14 (Hanford) (12 362) will be below the statutory permissible lower limit (-25.53%). (d) One representation Item (d) proposes to transfer four This proposal is not accepted villages (i.e. Tai Lam because there is no sufficient Chung Tsuen, Luen On San objective information and Tsuen, Tai Lam Wong Uk justification to prove that the and Tai Lam Wu Uk) from proposal made in the L13 (Sam Shing) to L12 representation is obviously (So Kwun Wat).