A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students A Nation Deceived The Templeton National Report on Acceleration What Parents, Teachers and Other Professionals Nicholas Colangelo Should Know Susan G. Assouline Miraca U. M. Gross About the October 2004 Templeton National Report on Acceleration The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development College of Education, The University of Iowa 600 Blank Honors Center Iowa City, Iowa 52242-0454 November 26, 2005 800.336.6463 http://www.nationdeceived.org Presenters Background • Debbi Andrews, MD • Debra Arnison Sutton • summit on acceleration at University of Iowa in • parent • parent May 2003 formulate national report on acceleration • Developmental • AABC/EABC member pediatrician, U of Alberta • involved in developing • what schools need to know in order to make the • involved in multi- Alberta Education's “The best decisions about educating highly capable disciplinary Journey: A Handbook for students developmental Parents of Children Who assessment of children Are Gifted and Talented” • A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back with special needs, America’s Brightest Students including gifted 3 4 Background Background •alarm to schools on the need to provide • tackles current misconceptions about acceleration accelerative experiences for brightest students and dispels their impact through •solid research base over last 50 years – research continuously demonstrates positive impacts of – examples of effective practice acceleration – real-life stories of students •but educational establishment remains skeptical • provides informed responses to key questions about acceleration 5 6 1 Background About the Title A Nation Deceived: • describes types of acceleration How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest • addresses social concerns Students • demonstrates cost effectiveness of acceleration • authors say deceived is a very strong word, but for colleges, schools, and parents reflects daily experience • gives specific ideas for what teachers and parents can do to help promote appropriate • provocative—and accurate acceleration • “When we tell ourselves that our brightest students would not benefit from acceleration, we deceive ourselves, our students, and the nation.” 7 8 What is acceleration? What’s in the book? • Acceleration is : • Volume 1: a user friendly executive summary that – moving through the traditional curriculum at a rate is accessible to all audiences faster than typical – appropriate educational planning • Volume 2: the research papers that support the summary for people who want the details – matching the level and complexity of the curriculum with the readiness and motivation of the student – 11 chapters written by experts in gifted • Acceleration is not : education and acceleration – pushing or hurrying a child – each focuses on an important aspect of – forcing a child to learn advanced material acceleration – making a child socialize with older children before he – sound and comprehensive review of the or she is ready acceleration literature as it relates to gifted students 9 10 Executive Summary - 1 Executive Summary - 2 • Schools routinely avoid academic acceleration •Students who are moved ahead: • Acceleration easiest and most effective way to – tend to be more ambitious help highly capable students – earn graduate degrees at higher rates • Myth: grade skipping stunts a child socially – have an excellent school experience – feel academically challenged and socially – Fact: 50 years of research shows that moving bright accepted students ahead often makes them happy – are not bored in school like many highly capable students who are forced to follow the curriculum for their age-peers 11 12 2 Executive Summary - 3 Executive Summary - 4 •A Nation Deceived is part of an initiative to get •Report includes information on: these findings into the hands of parents, teachers, and principals – entering school early – skipping grades in elementary school – Report available free to schools, the media, and parents requesting copies – Advanced Placement program – starting college/university ahead of time – http://www.nationdeceived.org – comments and experiences of accelerated students, – Hard copy and e-copy easily accessible to a Deans of Colleges of Education, a school wide audience superintendent, and a school board member – Publicity about the report, eg newspapers, – research by leading education experts Time magazine feature article •Detailed research information in Volume II 13 14 Executive Summary - 5 Executive Summary - 6 •Why haven’t schools, parents, and teachers accepted the idea of acceleration? • these reasons not supported by research – Lack of familiarity with the research • report provides teachers and parents the – Philosophy : must keep children with age group knowledge, support, and confidence to consider – Belief : acceleration hurries children out of childhood acceleration – Fear : acceleration hurts children socially • report hopes to change the conversation about – Worry : offending other students if one child is educating bright children by bringing up accelerated acceleration as a possibility – Politics : concerns about equity 15 16 Chapter 1: Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues – W. Thomas Southern and Eric D. Jones Volume 2 - A quick walk • 18 types of acceleration practices – which are the most well documented for effectiveness through the chapter headings and cost – the few problems experienced stemmed from incomplete (poor) planning • educators need to consider the best option(s) for acceleration, given the individual student and the specific circumstances 18 3 18 Types of Acceleration Chapter 2: Meta-analytic studies of Grade-based and Subject-based acceleration 1. Early Admission to K 10.Mentoring – James A. Kulik 2. Early Admission to Grade 1 11.Extracurricular Programs 3. Grade-Skipping 12.Correspondence Courses • no other arrangement for gifted children 4. Continuous Progress 13.Early Graduation works as well as acceleration 5. Self-Paced Instruction 14.Concurrent/Dual 6. Subject-Matter Acceleration/ Enrollment • accelerated students more likely to aspire Partial Acceleration 15.Advanced Placement 7. Combined Classes 16.Credit by Examination to advanced educational degrees 8. Curriculum Compacting 17.Acceleration in College 9. Telescoping Curriculum 18.Early Entrance into Middle • acceleration far more effective in raising School, High School, or College student achievement than the most successful school reform models From “Types of Acceleration: Dimensions and Issues,” by W. T. Southern and E. D. Jones, A Nation Deceived, V. II, Chapter 1, pp. 5–12. 19 20 Chapter 3: Long-term effects – David Lubinski Chapter 4: Public policy • longitudinal studies indicate accelerative curriculum educationally and developmentally – James J. Gallagher advisable • educators have been largely negative about • if curriculum moves too slowly, boredom and acceleration, despite abundant research evidence discontent frequently ensue • if want a major change in acceptability of • intellectually precocious students who accelerate acceleration, will probably need to use all the in middle school and high school view their pre- engines of change: legislation, the courts, college education much more positively than administrative rules, and professional initiatives non-accelerated intellectual peers • what has to change is not written policy, but the • acceleration critical for developing world-class attitudes of policy makers scientific leaders 21 22 Chapter 5: Academic effects Chapter 6: Social-emotional status – Karen B. Rogers – Nancy M. Robinson • acceleration falls into two broad categories • it is a myth that acceleration is inherently (grade- and subject-based) dangerous for gifted students • question for educators seems to be not whether • as a group, gifted children are socially and to accelerate a gifted learner but rather how emotionally more mature than their age mates • review of 380 studies revealed that almost all • for many gifted students, acceleration provides a forms of acceleration result in growth in better personal maturity match with their peers achievement • no studies showed deleterious social-emotional effects of acceleration 23 24 4 Chapter 7: Talent searches and Chapter 8: Whole-grade acceleration accelerated programming – Nicholas Colangelo, Susan G. Assouline, and Ann E. Lupkowski-Shoplik – Paula Olszewski-Kubilius • Talent Search scores can be used effectively to • we have evidence and mechanisms to make select students for acceleration whole grade acceleration a low-risk/high-success • research evidence from Talent Searches strongly intervention for qualified students supports that acceleration works • the Iowa Acceleration Scale (IAS) is a proven and effective instrument for helping schools make decisions about whole-grade acceleration 25 26 Chapter 9: Radical acceleration Chapter 10: Early entrance to college – Miraca U. M. Gross • Radical acceleration results in graduating from – Linda E. Brody, Michelle C. Muratori, and Julian C. Stanley high school 3 or more years before age mates • research on early entrants is extremely positive • gifted students pursuing individualized programs • much evidence of of radical acceleration achieve high, sometimes extraordinary, levels of academic success – short-term academic success – long-term occupational success • no indication of social or emotional – few social and emotional difficulties maladjustment arising