Symmetric and Hermitian Matrices

Symmetric and Hermitian Matrices

“notes2” i i 2013/4/9 page 73 i i Chapter 5 Symmetric and Hermitian Matrices In this chapter, we discuss the special classes of symmetric and Hermitian matrices. We will conclude the chapter with a few words about so-called Normal matrices. Before we begin, we mention one consequence of the last chapter that will be useful in a proof of the unitary diagonalization of Hermitian matrices. Let A be an m n matrix with m n, and assume (for the moment) that A has linearly independent× columns. Then≥ if the Gram-Schmidt process is applied to the columns of A, the result can be expressed in terms of a matrix factorization A = Q˜ R˜, where the orthogonal vectors are the columns in Q˜, and R˜ is unit upper triangular n n with the inner products as the entries in R˜. H × i 1 qk ai For example, consider that qi := ai k−=1 H qk. Rearranging the equa- − qk qk tion, P i 1 H n − qk ai ai = q + q + 0q i qH q k k kX=1 k k k=Xi+1 where the right hand side is a linear combination of the columns of the first i (only!) columns of the matrix Q˜. So this equation can be rewritten H q1 ai H q1 q1 H q2 ai H q2 q2 . H qi−1ai ˜ H ai = Q qi−1qi−1 . 1 0 . . 0 Putting such equations together for i = 1 ,...,n , we arrive at the desired result, A = Q˜ R˜. 73 “notes2” i i 2013/4/9 page 74 i i 74 Chapter5. SymmetricandHermitianMatrices Now, we really would prefer that Q˜ have orthonormal columns. That means column scaling each column of Q˜ by 1 divided by its length in the 2-norm. This corresponds to postmultiplication of Q˜ by a diagonal matrix D˜ that contains 1/ qi 2. k k 1 Thus, A = Q˜ R˜ = Q˜ D˜ D˜ − R˜ = QR , where now Q has orthonormal columns and R is still upper triangular, but it’s rows have been scaled by the entries in the 1 diagonal matrix D˜ − . The factorization A = QR is called the QR factorization of A. Although we assumed in the preceding for ease of discussion that A had linearly independent columns, in fact such a factorization exists for any matrix A, the fine details are omitted. 5.1 Diagonalization of Hermitian Matrices Definition 5.1. A matrix is said to be Hermitian if AH = A, where the H super- script means Hermitian (i.e. conjugate) transpose. Some texts may use an asterisk for conjugate transpose, that is, A∗ means the same as A. If A is Hermitian, it means that aij =a ¯ ji for every i, j pair. Thus, the diagonal of a Hermitian matrix must be real. Definition 5.2. A matrix is said to be symmetric if AT = A. Clearly, if A is real , then AH = AT , so a real-valued Hermitian matrix is symmetric. However, if A has complex entries, symmetric and Hermitian have different meanings. There is such a thing as a complex-symmetric matrix ( aij = aji ) - a complex symmetric matrix need not have real diagonal entries. Here are a few examples. Symmetric Matrices: 0 2 4 2 1 − 2 i 3 + 4 i A = ; A = 2 7 5 ; A = − . 1 4 − 3 + 4 i 8 7i 4 5 8 − − Hermitian Matrices: 1 2 + 3 i 8 6 8+4 i − 3 5 A = ; A = 2 3i 4 6 7i ; A = . 8 4i 9 − − − 5 8 − 8 6+7 i 5 As the examples show, the set of all real symmetric matrices is included within the set of all Hermitian matrices, since in the case that A is real-valued, AH = AT . On the other hand, one example illustrates that complex-symmetric matrices are not Hermitian. Theorem 5.3. Suppose that A is Hermitian. Then all the eigenvalues of A are real. “notes2” i i 2013/4/9 page 75 i i 5.1. Diagonalization of Hermitian Matrices 75 Proof. Suppose that Ax = λx for ( λ, x) an eigenpair of A. Multiply both sides of the eigen-equation by xH . (Recall that by definition of an eigenvector, x = 0.) Then we have 6 xH Ax = xH λx = λxH x H H 2 x A x = λ x 2 H k k2 (Ax ) x = λ x 2 H 2 k k (λx) x = λ x 2 k k2 λ¯ x 2 = λ x k k k k2 λ¯ = λ and the last equality implies that λ must be real. Recall that A is diagonalizable (over Cn) only when A has a set of n lin- early independent eigenvectors. We will show that Hermitian matrices are always diagonalizable, and that furthermore, that the eigenvectors have a very special re- lationship. Theorem 5.4. If A is Hermitian, then any two eigenvectors from different eigenspaces are orthogonal in the standard inner-product for Cn (Rn, if A is real symmetric). Proof. Let v1, v2 be two eigenvectors that belong to two distinct eigenvalues, H say λ1, λ 2, respectively. We need to show that v1 v2 = 0. Since this is true iff H H v1 (λ2v2) = λ2(v1 )v2 = 0, let us start there: H H v1 (λ2v2) = v1 (Av 2) H H = v1 A v2 H = ( Av 1) v2 H = ( λ1v1) v2 ¯ H = λ1v1 v2 H = λ1v1 v2, where the last equality follows using the previous theorem. It follows that ( λ2 H H − λ1)v1 v2 = 0. But we assumed that λ2 = λ1, it must be the case v1 v2 = 0, as desired. 6 Definition 5.5. A real, square matrix A is said to be orthogonally diagonaliz- able if there exists an orthogonal matrix Q and diagonal matrix D such that A = QDQ T . n n Definition 5.6. A matrix A C × is called unitarily diagonalizable if there ∈ “notes2” i i 2013/4/9 page 76 i i 76 Chapter5. SymmetricandHermitianMatrices exists a unitary matrix U and diagonal matrix D such that A = UDU H . Theorem 5.7 (Spectral Theorem). Let A be Hermitian. Then A is unitarily diagonalizable. 1 Proof. Let A have Jordan decomposition A = WJW− . Since W is square, we can factor (see beginning of this chapter) W = QR where Q is unitary and R is upper triangular. Thus, 1 H H A = QRJR − Q = QTQ where T is upper triangular because it is the product of upper triangular matrices 13 , and Q is unitary 14 . So A is unitarily similar to an upper triangular matrix T, and we may pre-multiply by QH and post-multiply by Q to obtain QH AQ = T. Taking the conjugate transpose of both sides, QH AH Q = TH However, A = AH and so we get T = TH . But T was upper triangular, and this can only happen if T is diagonal. Thus A = QDQ H as desired. Corollary 5.8. In summary, if A is n n Hermitian, it has the following properties: × A has n real eigenvalues, counting multiplicities. • The algebraic and geometric mulitplicites of each distinct eigenvalue match. • The eigenspaces are mutually orthogonal in teh sense that eigenvectors corre- • spoinidng to different eignevalues are orthogonal. A is unitarily diagonalizable. • Exercise 5.1. Let A and B both be orthogonally diagonalizable real matrices. a) Show A and B are symmetric b) Show that if AB = BA , then AB is orthogonally diagonalizable. 13 As mentioned elsewhere in the text, it is straightforward to show the product of upper trian- gular matrices is upper triangular. It is likewise straightforward to show that the inverse of an upper triangular matrix is upper triangular, so the expression RJR −1 is the product of 3 upper triangular matrices and is upper triangular 14 This is in fact the Schur factorization. “notes2” i i 2013/4/9 page 77 i i 5.1. Diagonalization of Hermitian Matrices 77 5.1.1 Spectral Decomposition Definition 5.9. The set of eigenvalues of a matrix A is sometimes called the spectrum of A. The spectral radius is the largest magnitude eigenvalue of A. We know that if A is Hermitian, A = QDQ H , so let us write triple matrix product out explictly: H λ1 0 0 q1 · · · H 0 λ2 0 q2 A = q1,..., qn . 0 .. .. .. . H 0 0 λn q · · · n H q1 H q2 = [ λ1q1, , λ nqn . · · · . qH n n H = λiqiqi Xi=1 This expression for A is called the spectral decomposition of A. Note that H H each qiqi is a rank-one matrix AND that each qiqi is an orthogonal projection matrix onto Span( qi). 5.1.2 Positive Definite, Negative Definitie, Indefinite Definition 5.10. Let A be a real symmetric matrix. We say that A is also positive definite if for every non-zero x Rn, xT Ax > 0. ∈ A similar result holds for Hermitian matrices Definition 5.11. Let A be a complex Hermitian matrix. We say that A is also positive definite if for every non-zero x CN , xH Ax > 0. ∈ A useful consequence of HPD (SPD) matrices is that their eigenvalues (which we already know are real due to the Hermitian property) must be NON-NEGATIVE. Therefore, HPD (SPD) matrices MUST BE INVERTIBLE! Theorem 5.12. A Hermitian (symmetric) matrix with all positive eigenvalues must be positive definite. Proof. Since from the previous section we know A = QDQ H exists, from what we are given, the entries of D must be positive. Let x = 0. Then 6 xH Ax = xH QDQ H x “notes2” i i 2013/4/9 page 78 i i 78 Chapter5.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us