IF A LANGUAGE IS EXCLUSIVELY SUFFIXING, IT IS POSTPOSITIONAL, IF IT IS EXCLUSIVELY PREFIXING IT IS PREPOSITIONAL If a language is exclusively suffixing, it is postpositional, if it is exclusively prefixing it is prepositional ■ Most languages do not ‘exclusively’ do either ■ The majority both prefix and suffix ■ Some languages neither prefix nor suffix PREPOSITIONSAL VS POSTPOSITIONAL WORLD LANGUAGES Matthew S. Dryer. 2013. Order of Adposition and Noun Phrase. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/85, Accessed on 2017-06-18.) GREENBERG UNIVERSAL 27 ■ PROPOSED IN 1963 ■ GREENBERG WAS DELIBERATELY LOOKING FOR LINGUISTIC UNIVERSALS ■ BASED ON DATA FROM 30 LANGUAGES GREENBERG UNIVERSAL 27 ■ Greenberg took data from a sample of 30 languages ■ 1 exclusively prefixing language (Thai) ■ 12 exclusively suffixing languages (Basque, Burmese, Japanese, Turkish, Finnish, Hindi, Kannada, Loritja, Nubian, Quechua, Songhai, Chibcha) ■ 17 languages which both prefix and suffix RESEARCH ■ Wanted to find data about languages that exclusively prefix or suffix ■ WALS had a large selection of data on affixation, but lacked detail on exclusivity ■ AUTOTYP had a very small selection of data, but included details on exclusivity ■ WALS data for Prepositionality/Postpositionality DATA ON PREFIXING VS SUFFIXING ■ DATA SAMPLE FROM AUTOTYP OF 77 LANGUAGES ■ 57 BOTH PREFIXED AND SUFFIXED (74%) ■ 13 EXCLUSIVELY SUFFIXED (16.9%) ■ 7 EXCLUSIVELY PREFIXED (9.1%) AND ADPOSITIONS? EXCLUSIVELY SUFFIX EXCLUSIVELY PREFIX POSTPOSITIONS 8 3 PREPOSITIONS 4 NO ADPOSITIONS/NO 4 0 DOMINANT ORDER * Diyari was removed because there was a lack of data on adpositions in the language Exclusively suffixing languagaes Exclusively prefixing languages Prepositional Postpositional N/A Prepositional Postpositional N/A Languages that follow Universal 27 Prepositional + prefixing Mon Khmu Jahai Pacoh Postpositional + suffixing Qiang Mongolian (Khalkha) Meithei Santali Hamer Udi Finnish Hayu Languages that do not follow Universal 27 ■ Kasunda, Diegueño, Kharia ■ 3 languages which contradict universal 27 ■ Exclusively prefixing but postpositional ■ Need to be tested if we want to disprove the universal Diegueño ■ Diegueño appears to prefix and suffix ■ Langdon, Margaret H. 1970. A Grammar of Diegueño: The Mesa Grande Dialect. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 66.) Berkeley: University of California Press. Kharia ■ Kharia appears to also have suffixes Peterson, John. (2007 Kharia. A south Munda Language Osnabruck: Osnabruck University press. Pg 69 Kusunda ■ Kusunda- there are references to potential suffixes ■ ’the possessive suffix –yi’ ‘i is a plural suffix’ ■ Paul Whitehouse; Timothy Usher; Merritt Ruhlen; William S.-Y. Wang (2004-04-13). "Kusunda: An Indo-Pacific language in Nepal" . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101 (15): 5692–5695. A TROUBLING NOTE ■ Not clear if any of the three languages which contradict the theory are exclusively prefixing ■ Demonstrates problems with the data, particularly issues with the classification of prefixing and suffixing ■ Universal 27 could still be true New statistics ■ With the removal of Kusunda, Diegueño and Kharia from the data, the Universal looks much healthier ■ 100% of exclusively prefixing languages are prepositional ■ 67% of exclusively suffixing languages are postpositional, and the remaining 33% have no dominant order or no adpositions Why is there a link between affixation and adpositions? ■ Implication that affixes and adpositions are connected ■ Some overlap between the function of adpositions and affixes, e.g English preposition ‘to’ and the dative case- which is often marked by an affix. ■ Perhaps a link to the assignment of theta roles in a sentence. ■ Possible link to head directionality- if a language is head initial it is likely to have prefixes and prepositions, if it is head-final it is likely to have suffixes and postpositions A note on Word Order Matthew S. Dryer. 2013. Order of Adposition and Noun Phrase. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/85, Accessed on 2017-06-18.) A note on Word Order Matthew S. Dryer. 2013. Order of Subject, Object and Verb. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/81, Accessed on 2017-06-18.) SVO and SOV structures ■ Possibly also a link to head directionality ■ Does the V head branch left or right? ■ English: Verb head branches left, adposition also branches left (prepositional), prefixes present in the language ■ Turkish: Verb head branches right, adposition branches right (postpositional), exclusively suffixing language. .