The Körtti Movement and Dress in Battles Over Finnish Politics

The Körtti Movement and Dress in Battles Over Finnish Politics

Title A tale of two centuries: The körtti movement and dress in battles over Finnish politics and identities Type Article URL https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/15285/ Dat e 2 0 1 9 Citation Almila, Anna-Mari (2019) A tale of two centuries: The körtti movement and dress in battles over Finnish politics and identities. Clothing Cultures. ISSN 2050-0742 Cr e a to rs Almila, Anna-Mari Usage Guidelines Please refer to usage guidelines at http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/policies.html or alternatively contact [email protected] . License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Unless otherwise stated, copyright owned by the author This is the accepted article in its pre-edited stage. Please refer to the published article in the journal Clothing Cultures https://www.intellectbooks.com/clothing-cultures A tale of two centuries: The körtti movement and dress in battles over Finnish politics and identities Anna-Mari Almila Abstract This paper looks into the transforming sartorial styles of a certain Christian Protestant revivalist movement in Finland in and around two very specific historical moments: independence from Russia in 1917; and 2017, when the Marriage Act was amended such that same-sex marriage become legal. The analysis covers crucial periods before and after the independence: late 19th and early 20th century, when Russia sought to tighten its control over autonomous Finland, and the Finnish intelligentsia organised to resist such attempts, through the civil war of 1918, to the turbulent right/left-divided years of the 1920s and 1930s. Then, the liberalisation of the körtti movement from the 1960s and 1970s onwards, and the effect of this upon the debates and battles over the equal marriage law before and after the law came into effect is discussed. I show how through changing histories, changing garments have the capacity to play key roles. By focussing on a particular movement through different times, it is shown how groups that go under the same name may be fundamentally different from their historical predecessors, how they may yet recognise a similar kind of garment even if they attach different kind of associations to it, and how new garments are sometimes required in order to communicate new positions of movements and individuals. For analyses of garments and cultural positions, this underlines the necessity to think of certain ‘times’ as part of a continuum, in which both changes and continuities in dress play out and influence socio-political relations. Keywords: religious dress, Protestant revivalism, gay rights, same-sex marriage, Finland Introduction In times of unrest, garments are capable of both asking questions and providing answers. They can stabilise and provoke; they may unite and divide. In this paper, I look into the transforming sartorial styles of a certain Christian Protestant revivalist movement in and around two very specific historical moments: Finland’s independence (from Russia) in 1917; and 2017, when the Marriage Act in Finland was amended such that same-sex marriage became legal. These are not arbitrarily picked examples, but are connected through a number of factors: battles over White/Red and liberal/conservative identities of people and the Nation; the fundamental intertwinedness of politics and religion; and reflections of all these factors in the 200-year history of the körtti movement and the dress preferences of its members. The politics of dress, particularly in times of turbulence, such as revolutions, wars and other social unrest, have been discussed by many. Dress can be used in attempts to build appealing and powerful hegemonies, such as in case of fascism (Paulicelli 2004). It can work as a visual- material resistance and rejection of racialised hegemonies (Cosgrove 1984). Revolutions evoke new forms of attire (Ribeiro 1988), religious reformations call for distinction from old styles of dress (Murdock 2000), wars bring with them material rationing and ideological dress alike (Summers 2015), and sexual and gender struggles are both expressed through dress, and evoke moral panics in terms of styles and garments (Paoletti 2015). In terms of resistant, or oppositional, dress, Barnard (2002: 129) speaks of two kinds of resistance: ‘Refusal is the attempt to step outside of the offending structures and reversal is the attempt to reverse the positions of power and privilege that operate within those structures’. But dress is used also by those who seek to defend their status and social position (Polhemus and Procter 1978). I here reflect upon two kinds of historical change: the changes in the character and image of the körtti movement itself, and changes in how garments associated with it are viewed, according to socio-political situation. I show how, as historical conditions change, social institutions and garments alike transform. Often, new garments expressing new identities emerge from such changes, too. My analysis will cover crucial periods before and after the independence: late 19th and early 20th century, when Russia sought to tighten its control over autonomous Finland, and the Finnish intelligentsia organised to resist such attempts, through the civil war of 1918, to the turbulent right/left-divided years of the 1920s and 1930s. On the other hand, I will discuss the liberalisation of the körtti movement from the 1960s and 1970s onwards, and how this reflected upon the debates and battles over the equal marriage law before and after the law came into effect. I have elsewhere argued that each of the six phases of the movement’s history – 1) the time of emergence and sectarianism; 2) the time of dispersion; 3) the time of integration and nationalism; 4) the time of organisation; 5) the time of liberalisation; and 6) the time of the Church in crisis – has influenced differently dress strategies within the movement (Almila 2019). I here focus more on certain turbulent moments in history, and their significance in light of national politics as well as political battles within Finland’s State Church. Methods I have used flexible qualitative methodological position in this research, combining different kinds of sources, both public and private, creatively. I draw upon archival and museum sources, namely written and image sources held by the Finnish Heritage Agency (https://www.museovirasto.fi/) and the University of Helsinki. I have also drawn upon written and image sources, as well as preserved garments and other objects, in the collections of the Körtti Museum in the town of Lapua (https://www.wanhakarhunmaki.fi/korttimuseo/) and the Lotta Svärd Museum in Tuusula (http://www.lottamuseo.fi/). An additional source has been my extended family’s family albums and diaries. I also gathered data through interviews and more informal conversations. My key informants were five people (three women, two men) who are actively participating in the movement, some of them working for the movement’s central association, Herättäjä-Yhdistys, or for the Church itself. A further source were online platforms, as the körtti movement and many of its members today operate in virtual environments. These involve Instagram and Facebook, where the hashtags #körtti and #körttipuku (körtti dress) gave some useful results. In addition, I conducted searches in the main online discussion forum of the movement, Körttifoorumi (foorumi.h-y.fi). I have also followed the media coverage of the debates surrounding the position of the Church in terms of equal marriage law and wider sexual equality, and watched a relevant documentary film from 1960s reflecting the liberalisation of the movement (Anttikoski et al). All translations from Finnish are mine. A short history of körtti and the körtti dress Körttiläisyys, or herännäisyys (awakening), is a revivalist movement within the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland, and a körtti (pl. körtit) is a member of said movement. The word körtti was initially a derogative term but was soon embraced by the ‘awakened’ themselves (Vilkuna 1928). Körttiläisyys derives from 18th century Pietism, which was characterised by Christocentricity, practice of piety in everyday life, centrality of emotions, and collectivity (Lindt-Gollin 1967). European Pietist sects often withdrew from mainstream society (Weber 2002), and the same can to a certain extent be said of the Finnish movement: until the 1890s, it was considered crucial for the members of the movement to part with the company they kept previously (Vilkuna 1928), and this was easier to achieve when a sectarian dress drew strict boundaries between the ‘awakened’ and others (Almila 2019). The time of emergence and sectarianism had its roots in the late 18th century and reached its height in 1820s-1850s. This was a time when a distinctive sectarian dress was typically spontaneously donned upon ‘awakening’. The time of dispersion, in 1860s-1880s, was marked by increasing withdrawal from mainstream religiosity. The körtti dress was used as a tool of control, and particularly imposed upon young children, in order to separate them from ‘worldly’ activities. The time of integration and nationalism, from the 1890s onwards, reached its peak during and after WWI. During this time, the körtti movement came to be more integrated within the Church, but also deeply embedded in nationalist politics. Wearing the körtti dress as everyday wear was fairly common in parts of the country where the movement was prominent. The time of organisation partly overlapped with this: the movement started to publish

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us