5779 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 1 sxc HALACHIC AND HASHKAFIC ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 110 - IS THERE A ‘PSAK’ IN HASHKAFA? OU ISRAEL CENTER - FALL 2018 There are many issues of hashkafa in our contemporary world on which there is a mainstream consensus approach and on which there are minority opinions. Consider the following issues: - Whether Religious Zionism is prohibited, legitimate or obligatory. - Whether secular studies, values or culture can or should be incorporated in the purview of our Torah worldview - Whether Chazal have any authority on issues of science that arise in the Talmud eg the age of the universe. A] WHAT IS ‘PSAK’? r¬Jt oI ºe Nvkt ,h ºk gu Tneu Wh·r gJ C ,ch r h"rcS gdºb k &gdb ih"c( ih )sk ihSih"C o + sk o Sih"C y ) PJNk r + c s &W N n .t"k Ph h/01 1. 2y3 PJNv rcS , "t ºWk (sh4vu & TJr3 su o·"v v ohn 5C v hv3h rJt y º"p7 vktu oº5uk3v &ohbv3/vk t ) ,t c(0y 2I 3C Wh vk8t 9v r:1ch r°Jêt v ¶rITv h•Pkgçth :W !rIh r"Jêt k#$f&F ,I )Gêg!k °T&rn!J&u v r°,&ch r$Jêt t )vv oIe.vi ° n )W&k sh°0h r°Jêt 1rc2v h3Pkg ,h 4Gg&u0h 2kt#!n&G ih"nh $W&k sh"0hr Jêt r5c2vi n r 4x, t°#k v6Gêg!T $W&k "r&nt#!hr Jêt y5P&J.vkg&u W 4rIh th8,:9h ohrcs The Torah here vests authority in the Rabbis of the Sanhedrin. • Which areas of Jewish life fall within this authority? Does this authority extend beyond the realm of halacha and if so how far? Issues of hashkafa? Totally non-religious matters? • Which Rabbinic bodies have this authority - just the Sanhedrin in the Mikdash? The Sanhedrin outside Y-m? Chazal? The Gedolei HaDor in each generation? 1 ohrcs s1tu ////// ktnau ihnh lk ushdh rat rcsv kfn rux, tk rntba vag, tkc rcug i,truvf vaug ubhta hn kf c 2. - luruh rat vru,v hp kg 2rnut tuv hrv //// /,udvbnvu ,ube,vu ,urAdv ivu vfhrm vgava vn hpku vru,k dhhx outaga okugv ie,ku ,sv eA1k hsf ohcrk ovc uruha ,udvbnvu ,urhAdvu ,ube,v ukt c vfkv t erp ohrnn ,ufkv o"cnr The authority of the Sanhedrin extended to ‘strengthening the religion’ and also ‘tikun olam’ rcs kfcu ruypu chh1u ruvyu tnyu r,unu ruxtc vru,v hfrsc ub,ut uumha vn kf ,uagku kusdv ihs ,hc kuec gunak 3. in aehvc uvuthmuha rcsv ut o,gsn ov uvutrha rcsv ihc vAc arpv ihtu //// Cub,sc iueh,u euAh1 tuva ovk vtrha kfv kg Cif rcsva ivk vtrha r1t ihbg kfc ut vru,v sux tuva uhkg unhfxha rcsv ut ivc ,arsb vru,va ohaehvv ivk gunak ihchh1 ubt vm, vumn lubh,v rpx Sefer Hachinuch seems to give the Sanhedrin very broad powers to rule in all areas that they find necessary. harsnu ,ugsvn vkcev sm kg ubk urnta vn kfk ubhuymb if Cvru,v hypanc o,nfxv r1t lkhk ubhuymba unfu 4. tuv C,umnv hruthcn ubhta vnc ukhpt ovhrcsn vyubv ktrah Cvhvh tk ut vuumn tuvv rntnv vhvh Coheuxpv tcv okugk ek1 uk ihtu xuruehpt r,t iubdxc hahn,v aursv i"rv ,uars The Ran insists that, just as we turn to the Rabbis in matters of psak, so too we must turn to them in matters of hashkafa or what one might classify as ‘metahalacha’. 1. This is a question which we will iy’H address in a later discussion of Da’at Torah. To download more source sheets and audio shiurim visit www.rabbimanning.com 5779 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 2 sxc /wudu lk ushdh rat rcsv hp kg ,hagu wudu ihsk ihs ihc osk os ihc ypank rcs lnn tkph hf cu,fv rnta vnn /// 5. ovc esesku oek1ku o,ut yurpk ohfhrma ohrcs otmn, Cihbhsv hbhbgn iuatrv euxpv kkufa vnc kf,an v,tafu Crnt tk hf Ckfav smn udauh rat Cohbhbgv in ihbg okkfc rhfAv tka Cvtr, tkv /kfav ,u,ut lrsc tk vkcev lrsc gbfvu uhkg 1uycu ouenv ,sucgf C,sv haran aracu uh,usncu trucv ,unac ut tuv lht Csu1hv ihbgc ep,x,af Cu,ut vcvtku Cubnn trhku C,urhcgv in vcua,v hbhbgu sxpvv hgdpn ohcuyv ohagnv rrcku Cunak vagnv s1hu Cuhbpk ovc ihnt,a Cvrfvvu kfav lrsc ostv uhkt ghdha vnn CvAk vnusvu una rucgc apbv og cua1ku Cuhbpn aauc,vku CvAk vnusa vnc lkfac ana,u l,gs kt cua,a rnt kct Csckc o,kce hrcs kg lunx,u Clnxvu vru,v hnf1 hsh kg kueau l,buc,u lkfac uhkg rue1,u Civherpu ivharau vru,v ,uumn kf ,kkuf thva Cvkcev smn uhkg sung,a r1t reav v1shu ,ntv lk rrc,ha sg Cl,gs (vnsev) ,ucckv ,ucu, The Chovot Halevavot appears to limit the Rabbinic authority of Lo Tasur to matters of pure halacha and mesora, not to matters which require some element of personal ‘sechel’. On issues of hashkafa, our mesorah is fundamental but must also be supplemented with personal thought and analysis. B] THE SANHEDRIN - HALACHA OR AGGADA? /vfkv uA - rcs ///// /rcsn cu,fv ihs ,hcca tkpunc - rcs lnn tkph hf 2ibcr ub, /trnd 6. :up ihrsvbx The Bavli analysis the pesukim dealing with the Sanhedrin. In defining the matters - ‘davar’ - that the passuk refers to, the Bavli says this means halacha. /vsdt uA - rcs //// /rcsn cu,fv ihs ,hcca tkpunca shdn - ypank rcs lnn tkph hf ch,f wnd 7. th erp ihrsvbx ,fxn (tbkhu) hnkaurh sunk, In the parallel passage in the Yerushalmi, ‘davar’ is defined as ‘agada’! vpeav lu,n ,rcxun thv vbcvvu Csunhkv rsxc vtucbv gpak oaur ah Cvtucbv ouen thva Cktrah .rtc if kg //// 8. ,nf1u Cuvk shryn tuv vtkcc tsunk,u /Fohf1n ktrah .rts trhutF ubhhvu Cohrurhc ,ufhrt lf kf lhrm ihtu ,hnhbp vbhta Ckcccn r,uh vcrv ktrah .rtc vkgp Cvru,v hara ka hnhbpv smv thva Cvsdtv ,nf1k suxh thva Cvtucbv ohgpaunv o,ut vbvu /Fuk vnrd kcca tkt Cvbhfa uhkg vra,a ubcr whv hutrF iye sgunc ibhrntsf Cvtucbk vhutr okmt vagb rcs lu,n rcs ,tmuvu ,ufkvv ka 1u,bvu Cokmt vkgn tuv rumhev - vtucbv ,nf1 ka oharavn ,ubvhk ohfuAv o,ut hcdka /hnkaurh ka sunhkv rsx suxh whv vAu Cypan yhk1vk ke Anr ovk hsu Cstn vc1r vrhexc Clf kf ovhkg ughpav tk vtucbv haraa Ckcc hbc hcdk kct /vfkvv rurhck ohrme oheuses hs whv vkgn ka vrutn /ohrcs ,ufhrt lhrm whvu rumhev ehpxn whv tk Cvarpc runtv FrcsF aurhpc Cihrsvbxc trnn ieAs thduxc hnkaurhu hkcc ihca eukh1c huk, rcsv suxhs CsFgk vtrbu vsdtv hbhbg iv iv ,ntca) ,ugsv hbhbgs Cc,f kFvu1k vnsevcs /Fvsdt uAF arpn hnkaurhu Fvfkv uAF arpn hkccvs /kfav hp kg rrck rapt ot hf ,ruxnvu lnxv hnf1k lhha vA ihts whtr vAu CFtkph hfsF trenc urfAb tk (ohhrehgv de vAhtrv ,urdt Rav Kook understands that the difference of approach between the Bavli and Yerushalmi represents a fundamental difference in perspective as to whether the world of nevuah and hashkafa falls within the purview of the Sanhedrin. The position of the Yerushalmi, which flows from of the prophetic connection of Eretz Yisrael, is that the world of aggada is central to the role of the Sanhedrin. The Bavli reflects a position deriving from the more detached and technical world of chutz l’Aretz - where the purview of the Rabbis is more limited to the world of halacha. vsdt kgc /vsdt u9 8 rcs 9. th erp ihrsvbx ,fxn van hbp However, Rav Kook’s reading is not the only one. The classic commentaries on the Yerushalmi see this as a qualification for the head of the Sanhedrin - that he must be proficient in aggada - rather than a definition of the role of the Sanhedrin per se. To download more source sheets and audio shiurim visit www.rabbimanning.com 5779 - dbhbn ovrct [email protected] 3 sxc C] IS THERE HASHKAFIC PSAK IN THE TALMUD? C1] IS IT BETTER TO EXIST OR NOT? ukkvu Ctrcban r,uh trcb tka ostk uk 1ub 2ohrnut ukkv /kkv ,hcu htna ,hc uek1b vm1nu ohba h,a 2ibcr ub, 10. apaph - trcba uhafg /trcban r,uh trcb tka ostk uk 1ub 2urndu ubnb /trcb tkan r,uh trcba ostk uk 1ub 2ohrnut uhagnc ananh 2vk hrntu /uhagnc :dh ihcurhg Beit Shamai and Beit Hillel argued for years on the issue of whether it would have been easier for man to have been created or not - apparently an idea which relates to pure hashkafa. At the end of that argument, the Gemara states - ‘nimnu v’gamru’ - they counted and decided. This is apparently a reference 2 to a process of psak in the Sanhedrin! hbag tka ,frcc ifu ?wktrah hbagaw ubhhvs cuhj lrs tku wkhka lrs uz vfrc ube, vnk whaen ohcr /hud hbag tka (d"np) (s) 11. tka ubk cuys ostv vagba vhagv kg lrck ube, tk f"g /trcb tka ostk cuy v"cu a"c urndu ubnba hpk ohmr,nu /vat o"ufg vagb tka kg ,ujpv kfk tkt 'vagb un inhx ohh, ,rut 9"y The Taz picks up on this point and uses it to explain why we make negative berachot in the morning - ‘shelo asani ...’. Since it would have been ‘better’ not to have been created at all, we cannot thank God for creating us! So we express our thanks in the negative - ‘at least it wasn’t ...’. ostv trcb tka rnuk urndu unhfxv f"gu /ohhagvn r,uh ov ihutkva ',umnv ihbnk vzc utca k"r - urndu ubnbs vzc rntu 12.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages6 Page
-
File Size-