Astrocyte Effects on Hippocampal Synaptogenesis in Culture and Near-Field Microscopy Robert Thomas Doyle Iowa State University

Astrocyte Effects on Hippocampal Synaptogenesis in Culture and Near-Field Microscopy Robert Thomas Doyle Iowa State University

Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2001 Astrocyte effects on hippocampal synaptogenesis in culture and near-field microscopy Robert Thomas Doyle Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons, and the Neurosciences Commons Recommended Citation Doyle, Robert Thomas, "Astrocyte effects on hippocampal synaptogenesis in culture and near-field microscopy " (2001). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 423. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/423 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 effects on hippocampal synaptogenesis in culture and near-field by Robert Thomas Doyle A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Co-majors: Zoology (Neuroscience); Neuroscience Major Professor: Philip G. Hay don Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2001 UMI Number: 3003237 UMI UMI Microform 3003237 Copyright 2001 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii Graduate College Iowa State University This is to certify that the Doctoral dissertation of Robert Thomas Doyle has met the dissertation requirements of Iowa State University Signature was redacted for privacy. Major Professor Signature was redacted for privacy. For the Co-Major Program Signature was redacted for privacy. G Uajor Pr gram Signature was redacted for privacy. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 The Neuron Doctrine 1 The subservience of glia 2 Dogma and change 3 Advances in science are tied to advances in technology 4 The synapse 6 Dissertation organization 8 CHAPTER 2. ASTROCYTES SELECTIVELY ENHANCE HIPPOCAMPAL 10 EXCITATORY SYNAPSE FORMATION AND AUGMENT THE MAGNITUDE OF THE N-TYPE CALCIUM CURRENT. Abstract 10 Introduction 11 Methods and Materials 13 Results 19 Discussion 30 References 33 CHAPTER 3. EXTRACTION OF NEAR-FIELD FLUORESCENCE FROM 44 COMPOSITE SIGNALS TO PROVIDE HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES OF GLIAL CELLS. Abstract 44 Introduction 45 Methods and Materials 46 Results 48 Discussion 53 References 55 CHAPTER 4. GENERAL SUMMARY 59 APPENDIX A. TARGET- DEPENDENT INDUCTION OF 61 SECRETORY CAPABILITIES IN AN IDENTIFIED MOTONEURON DURING SYNAPTOGENESIS APPENDIX B. TARGET CONTACT REGULATES THE CALCIUM 89 RESPONSIVENESSOF THE SECRETORY MACHINERY DURING SYNAPTOGENESIS APPENDIX C. CONTACT- DEPENDENT REGULATION OF N-TYPE 108 CALCIUM CHANNEL SUBUNITS DURING SYNAPTOGENESIS iv GENERAL REFERENCES 129 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 135 1 "What is the Junction of the neuroglia in the nervous system? At the present, no one knows, but even worse still is the fact the this problem has remained unsolvedfor a long time because the physiologists lack direct methods to study this phenomenon." (Santiago Ramon y Cajal, The Neuron and the Glial Cell). CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION The focus of this dissertation is twofold: first, the affect of astrocytes on synapse formation and second, the presentation of a new imaging technique for high-resolution fluorescence investigations at and just below the membrane of cells. The first paper addresses the concept that astrocytes play a part in forming the synaptic connections between neurons and adds to the emerging picture that glial cells are active participants in brain function. The second paper introduces a near-field imaging technique that has been designed for use in biological investigations The key to neural functioning is centered on communication among the cells that comprise the nervous system. It has been established that the key to this communication is the specialized contact that exists between nerve cells for information transfer, the synapse. The Neuron Doctrine Before the concept of the synapse was espoused by Sherrington (Shepard, 1988) in 1897, the Neuron Doctrine had displaced the reticular theory on how the nervous system functioned and placed neurons at the epicenter of brain function. The reticular theory was entrenched in the mid to late 1800's (Dierig, 1994; Edwards and Huntford, 1998; Katz- 2 Sidlow, 1998) and held that the nervous system was a continuous network of cellular material. Making use of an advance in microscopy, Nansen (Edwards and Huntford, 1998) examined the nervous tissue of invertebrates with oil immersion lenses and published the first paper calling the basic concept of the reticular theory into question, he had seen free nerve endings. Studies by others appeared almost at the same time (Edwards and Huntford, 1998) and set the stage for a change in thinking about the nervous system (Fodstad et al., 2000). The term 'neuron' was introduced in 1891 by Waldeyer (Dierig, 1994; Edwards and Huntford, 1998; Katz-Sidlow, 1998) in an article reviewing the work of six researchers, Nansen, His, Koelliker, Lenhossek, Ramon y Cajal, and Retzius, all of whom had contributed data disputing the reticular theory. Waldeyer wrote that their ideas could be summarized into a concept that the nervous system is composed of "innumerable units, not connected genetically or anatomically" (Edwards and Huntford, 1998). Waldeyer's summary provided the basis for new scientific dogma, the Neuron Doctrine. From that point on, the nervous system was only seen as the sum of the capabilities of neurons. The Subservience of Glia Glial cell research had reached a prolific point at the same time that the Neuron Doctrine emerged. Glia were also recognized as distinct entities and as part of the architecture of the brain but not as functional units of information processing. They were looked upon by their discoverer, Rudolph Virchow, as the 'glue' (nervenkitt) that holds the neurons together(Dierig, 1994; Finger, 2000). The view that these cells were nothing more than passive comrades of nerve cells remained the view of most neurobiologists. 3 The fact that glial cells existed to serve the needs of neurons was only strengthened as new data describing these types of functions were presented. Glia are responsible for maintenance of homeostasis of the neuronal environment, they serve as a nutritional conduit from endothelial cells to neurons (Poitry-Yamate et al., 1995) (Tsacopoulos and Magistretti, 1996) , and act as a supplier of metabolic precursors needed by the neurons to produce neurotransmitters (Laake et al., 1995; Lapidot and Gopher, 1994; Westergaard et al., 1995). Neurons were found to be electrically excitable and advances in the technology used to detect electrical signals propelled neurons to a place of prominence in brain function. By their electrical silence, glial cells were ignored when investigations of information processing in the CNS were considered. Dogma and Change Change in understanding how physiological processes work, once dogma has been accepted, can be extremely difficult. The brain itself was overlooked for hundreds of years and it took Hippocrates to change the view of the heart as the center of perception to the view that the brain was the seat of Joys, delights, laughter and sports, and sorrows, griefs, despondency and lamentations''' (Finger, 2000). The power of dogma is again exemplified in the existence of the "rete mirabile", a structure of blood supply at the base of the brain thought to be responsible for the generation of'animal spirits'. This structure 'existed' in human anatomy for over 1300 years because Galen said so. Galen used animals as models for his dissections and studies of anatomy and this structure is indeed found in the species that he actually dissected. Galen assigned this structure to the human body to explain the functioning of the brain and this fact was not questioned

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    144 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us