The Low-Mass Stellar Content of Westerlund 1

The Low-Mass Stellar Content of Westerlund 1

The low-mass stellar content of Westerlund 1 Morten Andersen (Gemini South) Galactic young massive star clusters • Connection between local and global SF. • Can resolve the stellar populations to low masses • Star counts instead of integrated properties • Directly measure the IMF The IMF in resolved massive clusters Only scale-free part probed Westerlund 1 • Distance of ~4 Kpc, age 3-5 Myr • Total mass estimated to be 50000 Msun • High foreground extinction • Best opportunity for resolving the low mass content in a young massive cluster • HST J (F125W) and H (F160W) band imaging Westerlund 1 from ground 5pc 4.5’ SOfI JHK, Brandner et al. 2007, Gennaro et al. Early lessons • Probe down to ~3 Msun, normal (Salpeter) IMF • Total mass of ~50000 Msun assuming standard IMF • Mass segregated, at least for high masses • Elliptical cluster • Currently difficult to improve from the ground Westerlund 1 with HST 5pc 4.5’ WFC3 F125W, F160W. Andersen et al. 2016 Color-magnitude diagrams Andersen et al. 2016 Foreground population Andersen et al. 2016 Red Clump Andersen et al. 2016 Background contamination Andersen et al. 2016 Cluster main sequence MS/PMS turn-on Andersen et al. 2016 Field star subtraction Andersen et al. 2016 Mass Functions Log-normal fit below 1 Msun to the 50% completeness limit. Power-law fit above 1 Msun (Siess 4 Myr isochrone) Change of fit parameters as a function of radius M < 1 Msun, log-normal fits Comparable peak mass as the field. More narrow distribution Change of fit parameters as a function of radius M > 1 Msun Evidence for mass segregation out to 1.5-2 pc Andersen et al. 2016 The IMF of Westerlund 1: • Reach down to 0.2 Msun in outer parts • Log-normal fit provides results similar to the field • Evidence for M > 1 Msun mass segregated • Total mass of cluster (star counts) 50000 Msun Is Westerlund 1 bound? • Gas expulsion has already occurred • The most massive stars exploded. • Has this disrupted the cluster or will it survive? • Is it a light-weight globular cluster progenitor? • Radial vel. measurements provide vel. dispersion • Multi-epoch Magellan R~20000 spectra Radial velocity dispersion B supergiants Yellow hyper giants Yellow hyper giants Low velocity dispersion 2.1+3.4-0.9km/s Cottaar, Meyer, Andersen & Espinoza, A&A 2012 Consistent with cluster being bound Gemini GeMS/GSAOI K band: NGS configuration on the observed mosaic GSAOI (2.1 micron) vs HST (F125W) FOV 45”x60” Source detection: GSAOI (left), HST (right) Increased source counts mainly due to resolution.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    22 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us