Eastern Alps)

Eastern Alps)

Swiss J Geosci (2015) 108:239–251 DOI 10.1007/s00015-015-0193-0 Ductile to brittle fault zone evolution in Austroalpine units to the southeast of the Tauern Window (Eastern Alps) 1 2 3 4 Andreas Wo¨lfler • Wolfgang Frisch • Harald Fritz • Martin Danisˇik • Anke Wo¨lfler5 Received: 7 August 2014 / Accepted: 4 July 2015 / Published online: 28 July 2015 Ó Swiss Geological Society 2015 Abstract This study combines structural and ther- Miocene times. We also demonstrate that low-temperature mochronological analysis with published geochronological thermochronology is a viable tool to resolve the timing of data to evaluate the tectonic evolution of the ductile Main brittle faulting and accompanied fluid activity. Mylonite Zone and the adjacent brittle Ragga–Teuchl fault to the southeast of the Tauern Window. The Main Mylonite Keywords Fault zones Á Ductile deformation Á Brittle Zone experienced ductile deformation with top-to-the-NW deformation Á Fission track dating Á Eastern Alps transport direction. From microstructural analysis and published K/Ar and Ar/Ar data the timing for this ductile deformation is proposed to be Late Cretaceous in age, 1 Introduction contemporaneous to a well documented extensional col- lapse that affected large parts of the Eastern Alps. Subse- Although the European Alps are investigated intensively by quent brittle faulting affected the Main Mylonite Zone and more than 200 years, there are still areas where modern data neighbouring units. Apatite fission track data suggest that or even detailed geological maps are rare. One of these areas brittle deformation along the Ragga–Teuchl fault and is situated in the Austroalpine units to the south-east of the adjacent units occurred in the middle- and late Miocene Tauern Window, the so-called Kreuzeck Mountains (*23 and *11 Ma), contemporaneous with the main (Figs. 1, 2a). In this area the WNW-trending, south-dipping phase of lateral extrusion. Our results show that a rather Main Mylonite Zone (Hoke 1990) forms the contact between small study area may comprise information about the two units that differ significantly in their structural and evolution of the Eastern Alps from Late Cretaceous to late metamorphic history (Figs. 2b, 3) (e.g. Schuster et al., 2004, 2013). Hoke (1990) already pointed out the importance of Editorial handling: A. G. Milnes. this shear zone that has been interpreted as a normal fault that was active from the Late Cretaceous to the Early Paleogene. & Andreas Wo¨lfler In places the Main Mylonite Zone is affected by brittle faults, woelfl[email protected] which rework the mylonites along their strike (Figs. 2b, 3). 1 The aim of this study is to shed more light into the Institut fu¨r Geologie, Leibniz Universita¨t Hannover, Callinstraße 30, 30167 Hannover, Germany kinematic and temporal evolution of the Main Mylonitic Zone and adjacent brittle faults. For this purpose we pro- 2 Institut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, Wilhelmstraße 56, 72074 Tu¨bingen, Germany vide microstructural analysis of quartz-rich rocks including quartz texture analyses. Since it is well documented that 3 Institut fu¨r Erdwissenschaften, Karl-Franzens Universita¨t Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria both intracrystalline- and recovery processes are strongly T-dependent and form diagnostic microstructures and tex- 4 Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Waikato, Hillcrest Road, tures (e.g. Hirth and Tullis 1992; Stipp et al. 2002a, b, Hamilton, New Zealand 2006) we will link our results with thermochronological 5 Department Angewandte Geowissenschaften und Geophysik, data to evaluate the timing of deformation. To unravel the Montanuniversita¨t Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria timing of brittle faulting we attempt to date thermal 240 A. Wo¨lfler et al. 17° 16° 15° 14° 10° 11° 12° 13° 48° Passau Donau Inn Wien München 48° 48° Molasse basin SEMP BF Tauern Window Graz 47° 47° KF DAV Pannonian MV basin Maribor Figure 2a PF Drava 46° 17° 16° Adamello 15° 46° 14° 10° 11° 12° 13° Adriatic plate Penninic nappes Neogene sedimentaryand magmatic rocks Piemontais Dinarides Upper Cretaceous to Paleogen sediments Southalpine unit Brianconnais of the Gosau Group Upper Austroalpine unit: Eoalpine upper plate Valais units derived from the Meliata-Vardar domain Eoalpine extrusion wedge Subpenninic nappes Eoalpine lower plate Helvetic and Ultrahelvetic nappes Lower Austroalpine unit European continent: undeformed foreland Fig. 1 Tectonic map of the Eastern Alps following the nomenclature Antholz-Vals fault, SEMP Salzach-Ennstal-Mariazell-Puchberg fault, of Schmid et al. (2004) (modified after Froitzheim et al. 2008). BF PF Pustertal fault, MV Mo¨ll valley fault Brenner normal fault, KF Katschberg normal fault, DAV Defereggen- anomalies within fault zones by comparison of zircon- and Southalpine and Austroalpine units represent the Adriatic apatite fission track data (ZFT, AFT) at the transition from microplate and are widely exposed in the Eastern Alps fault-related rocks to the undeformed host rock. For this we while the units derived from the Penninic oceanic realm choose the Ragga–Teuchl fault, a cataclastic fault zone that and the European margin are mainly exposed in tectonic borders the northern part of the Main Mylonite Zone in the windows like the Tauern Window (Fig. 1). east and strikes away from the mylonites in the western The study area is located to the southeast of the Tauern part of the study area (Fig. 2b, 3). Additionally we sampled Window (Figs. 1, 2) which consist of polyetamorphic rocks a well exposed brittle fault to the north of the Ragga Teuchl which were overprinted from the Devonian to the Cretaceous fault (sample KR 5 in Fig. 2b). Our results show that (e.g. Hoinkes et al. 1999; Neubauer et al. 1999). The WNW- multidisciplinary methods may provide information about trending, south-dipping Main Mylonite Zone is situated at the evolution of a rather small study area from the Late the contact of the Prijakt–Polinik and Strieden Complex to Cretaceous to Late Miocene times. the north and south, respectively (Fig. 2) (Schuster et al. 2004, 2013). The mylonitic foliation and stretching lineation generally strikes E–W and/or WNW–ESE (Fig. 3) and 2 Geological setting and geochronology kinematic indicators suggest that the Main Mylonite Zone of the study area acted as a normal fault where the Strieden Complex moved over the Prijakt–Polinik Complex (Hoke 1990). The Eastern Alps are composed of units derived from the The Prijakt–Polinik Complex experienced a metamor- European continent, the Penninic oceanic realm and units phic imprint under amphibolite to eclogite facies conditions derived from the Adriatic microplate (Figs. 1, 2a). The during the Eo-Alpine metamorphism (Schmid et al. 2004; Ductile to brittle fault zone evolution in Austroalpine units to the southeast of the Tauern… 241 13.1 13.2 13.3 a b Obervellach Prijakt-Polinik Tauern Window Complex Sample KR 5: Mölltal fault 46.9 Fig. 3 ZFT hr: 41.2±2.8 Ma dz: 40.5±2.7 Ma AFT: hr: 15.9±1.0 Ma dz: 16.4±0.7 Ma fc: 11.5±1.0 Ma Strieden Complex Mühldorf Fig. 2b Sample KR 6: ZFT hr: 55.6±3.3 Ma fc: 54.2±3.6 Ma Sample KR 9: AFT: hr: 30.4±1.1 Ma ZFT: 67.3±3.9 Ma ? dz: 28.6±2.7 Ma AFT: 32.8±2.9 Ma fc: 23.3±0.8 Ma Sample KR 8: ZFT: 60.4±4.3 Ma Greifenburg AFT: 33.2±1.9 Ma Quarternary Ragga-Teuchl fault Adria derived units: Penninic derived units: Polinik Block Upper Austroalpine: (brittle fault) Upper Penninic Kreuzeck Block possible trend of the Drauzug-Gurktal Nappes Ragga-Teuchl fault Nappe System Lower Penninic Main Mylonite Zone Nappes other investigated Koralpe-Wölz ? possible trend of the brittle fault (KR 5) Nappe System European derived Main Mylonite Zone units: other brittle faults Lower Austroalpine: Subpenninic (not investigated) Nappes Lower Austro- 25 km 5 km alpine Fig. 2 a Tectonic map of the Kreuzeck Mountains and neighbouring areas (modified after Schuster et al. 2013). b Digital elevation model of the study area with sample localities of fission track samples (coordinates are given in Tables 1 and 2) Schuster et al. 2001, 2004). Published geochronological Wo¨lfler et al. 2008, 2015) and 33 to 20 Ma (Staufenberg data from the Prijakt-Polinik Complex include Cretaceous 1987;Wo¨lfler et al. 2008, 2015), respectively. Since the K/Ar- and Ar/Ar ages on white mica and biotite (Oxburgh Main Mylonite Zone and the Ragga–Teuchl fault were et al. 1966; Lambert 1970; Waters 1976; Hoke 1990; active at different times we refer the terms Prijakt-Polinik Dekant 2009;Wo¨lfler et al. 2015). The Strieden Complex and Strieden Complex to the Cretaceous to Paleogene experienced only an anchizonal to lowermost greenschist activity of the Main Mylonite Zone and the terms Polinik facies Eo-Alpine imprint (Schuster et al. 2001, 2004). K/Ar and Kreuzeck Blocks to the Oligocene to Miocene activity and Ar/Ar ages on white mica and biotite reported from the of the Ragga-Teuchl fault. Strieden Complex are between 337 and 141 Ma (Brewer and Jenkins 1969; Brewer 1970; Waters 1976; Hoke 1990; Dekant 2009;Wo¨lfler et al. 2015). 3 Methods During the Miocene lateral extrusion the whole area was affected by steeply dipping brittle faults (Figs. 2b, 3). The study of microstructures and textures of quartz is According to the distribution of ZFT and AFT data, the aimed to document possible changes in deformation Ragga–Teuchl fault separates the study area into two mechanisms that are known to be sensitive to temperature, domains with different ages (Wo¨lfler et al. 2008). The strain rate, stress and water content (e.g. Hirth and Tullis Polinik Block to the north of the Ragga–Teuchl (Fig.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us