Appendix B Construction Plans Appendix C Photographic Record Log Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 1 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: South of DS-110 project limits Direction: South Comment: Wide u-shaped feature with erosional rills on eastern side of channel. No scouring of vegetation along base of channel to indicate flows. Non-native grasses dominate. Photograph: 2 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-110 Direction: Southeast Comment: Feature is more swale-like in appearance, less defined, no evident OHWM or indication of regular flows. Feature narrows the terminal end is located on an upward slope. Photograph: 3 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-110 Direction: Northwest Comment: Hill slope topography evident. DS-110 is isolated from DS-64A at the base of the coastal sage scrub vegetated hill. 1 Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 4 Photo Date: June 16, 2009 Location: DS-64A Direction: Southeast Comment: Narrow roadside ditch appears to receive flows from the side of the road (right of frame in background). No connection to DS-110. Photograph: 5 Photo Date: June 16, 2009 Location: DS-64A Direction: Northwest Comment: Culvert of DS-64A passing below the IRWD access road. Recent vegetation mowing has occurred alongside the road. Photograph: 6 Photo Date: June 16, 2009 Location: DS-64A Direction: Northeast Comment: Sandbags placed in erosional runoff along steep IRWD access road. Flows connect with the outlet portion of DS-64A. 2 Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 7 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-11 Direction: West Comment: Culvert is 48” in diameter. Vegetation within channel near culvert is more sparse than the vegetation at the ends of the project area. Photograph: 8 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-11 Direction: East Comment: Riparian vegetation dense on banks. Photograph: 9 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-11 Direction: South Comment: Bank is asphalt paved at culvert location. CDFG jurisdiction extends well beyond stream banks. 3 Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 10 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-12 Direction: East Comment: DS-12 is more open with less of a riparian canopy, especially near the road. The drainage is shallower (low to no banks) and the species are mostly facultative plants. Photograph: 11 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-12 Direction: North Comment: Adjacent vegetation at this location (outside of drainage) is mostly upland. Photograph: 12 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-12 Direction: North Comment: Soil sample location located near culvert. 4 Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 13 Photo Date: June 22, 2009 Location: DS-12 Direction: East Comment: Shows terminal location of drainage with a dense riparian canopy but not a wetland indicative herbaceous layer. Photograph: 14 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-12 Direction: West Comment: From end of drainage looking “upstream.” Mostly unvegetated at base of channel through herbaceous layer. Photograph: 15 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-23 Direction: Southeast Comment: From end of the access road looking at drainage. Channel is more narrow and recessed 5-6 feet from the surface of the access road. Dense riparian vegetation (mostly mulefat shrubs) within channel. 5 Laguna Canyon Road Drainage Improvements Project Photo Log Photograph: 16 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-23 Direction: East Comment: Top of bank adjacent to site of soil pit. Photograph: 17 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: DS-23 Direction: East Comment: End of channel, east of soil pit. Vegetation is still somewhat sparse at the base of the channel. Photograph: 18 Photo Date: June 5, 2009 Location: Near DS-12 and DS-23 Direction: Northwest Comment: Abandoned facilities near channels. Currently, there does not appear to be a surface connection to this location as DS-23 curves and ends well before this area. Grading will not impact these buildings. 6 Appendix D Arid West Data Sheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region ProjecVSite: '-"j1tN)" CCw1a"(\ lX\hß~ City/County: 0C0J1lQ. Sampling Date: C:-5-0Cr ApplicanVOwner: de el, State: CA Sampling Point: I Investigator(s): StephM'¡ (? Rr~¡ ~ l;;U:Acøf Section, Township, Range: ~ I ~q i bS ( i2 gw Landform (hilslope, terrace, etc.): \¡tl(('~t 4 rocjcut: Local relief (concave, convex, none): ('(Jf1Cc.v- Slope (%): I. 2;", Subregion (LRR): c. I Lat: '33. bOJ Ö~ S N Long: I \l ,1 k: ') I (¿g I( Datum:6JA:() t3 Soil Map Unit Name: \'?f5 Úi 0~ b rJCtndi-ô Ló típo (1--1 · (b S\'(Yßt2") NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes +- No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstanæs" present? YesA- No_ Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes /ø No ~r Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No - within a Wetland? Yes No V Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No ~ -- Remarks: Sa""k PO'I(\'t " ~ /c('¿llttl (P 1)$ 1\ lh tire~ c;S M (Ye+ -t I\I- ptt rti V\ wcl-lfÁ~. Vf~.e1-utOV1 &AlrniMtlbh ,bktá on hay b I ~y- SIf\CL -th.'IS tAN:A hÆS () nA-r~ oUse n'PM\Oh C&lV\Dl~ t't bÆ~d OVl.+t dýl\ c\l +k dfl iN. VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size~;¡1 celt i) ~ % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. €M. lA!, ¡\r¡L;) (ç liC V ~fA 30''1 Y N: t;., hat Are OSL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 2j': :. kh o¡. ?to '¡. = Total Cover That Are OSL, FACW, or FAC: J (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 f (C.dí6 ) 1. ml'll-Ç,,+ C~s 5o.dWUo-) 30). ~ FAC.VJ Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OSL species x 1 = 4. FACW species (00 x2 = i-zo 5. FAC species lQ x3 = 3D 3D'!. = Total Cover FACU species x4 = UPL species x 5 = 1. y FACt. ieI'/. Column Totals: 70 (A) 150 (B) 2. ,:)'1 fAClÅ 2.1 Lf 3. l/ -fACLA Prevalenæ Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ~ominance Test is ;,50% "rji 6. .ì Prevalence Index is ~3.01 ~ 7. _ Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 1?:/1. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: llndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation /;¥;e % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? YesÝ- No_ ~m.ark(\ I) ."1 ÑÁ' c 0.1' r eiÑ'vi \~ f2 it¡ g'~ . ~o ~Y' co~~ìdere V~ \ì U Iy l,fl ~y\d) ~O Yr~y- 1J ,t dMi9ruW1 I?~ lAJDA Vlaf' b0~ tl (\ \ì'trd. lr1tlV"" . To ~(O~:Mki;\~ '" 7 °/,) ~(Yayil~ upland s~. ~ arel( vuowd ilA(' -fr " f) "t á (,1'(J2- ~ r b I v us Army orps of E~gineers r.ti (\ì ÐBL ('\4& i:vJ. -- is VD ~\A(~ ~ vzM~ ':ersion 2.0 -r 't\?t\vlC\1' C.~V\Dil'j C\PP.Ct(r it ~ bA:çed Of' Jeq:r _ ,.ÇOvtV-Cl of Q JJ.jAVÐ I ÒJJ ~ +l r(, sys-tl'.Ç Of -T4- Stip\\~~lÌ(vJ?S i.~ G(A f'¿(, . SOIL Sampling Point' / Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) ~ Color (moist) ~~ Loc2 Texture Remarks O-y d.SY;lS/( /of) ~-=- ~ cdYIQce"l - --- - --- lType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,- RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered --- or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (A 1) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ 2 cm Muck (A 10) (LRR B) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (M) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) ~ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) _ Depleted Dark Surfaæ (F7).p _ Thick Dark Surfaæ (A 12) _ R.edox Depressions (F8) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Vernal Pools (F9) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes NO-4 Remarks: H!Jliý ('~.kd ! HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (A 1) _ Salt Crust(B 11) _ Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Biotic Crust (B12) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) _ Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) _ Water Marks (B1) (Non riverine) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Drift Deposits (B3) (Non riverine) _ Presence of Reduæd Iron (C4) _ Crayfsh Burrows (C8) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ~ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) JShallow Aquitard (D3) .