<p>(Pro-) Étale Cohomology 3. Exercise Sheet </p><p>Department of Mathematics Prof. Dr. Torsten Wedhorn </p><p>Timo Henkel </p><p>Winter Semester 18/19 <br>2nd November 2018 </p><p>Homework </p><p><strong>Exercise H9 </strong>(Clopen subschemes) </p><p>(12 points) <br>Let <em>X </em>be a scheme. We define </p><p>Clopen(<em>X</em>) := {<em>Z </em>⊆ <em>X </em>| <em>Z </em>open and closed subscheme of <em>X</em>}. </p><p>Recall that Clopen(<em>X</em>) is in bijection to the set of idempotent elements of O<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>X </em></sub>(<em>X</em>). Let <em>X </em>→ <em>S </em>be a morphism of schemes. We consider the functor <em>F</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>X / S </em></sub>from the category of <em>S</em>-schemes to the category of sets, given by </p><p><em>F</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>X / S</em></sub>(<em>T </em>→ <em>S</em>) = Clopen(<em>X </em>×<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>S </em></sub><em>T</em>). </p><p>Now assume that <em>X </em>→ <em>S </em>is a finite locally free morphism of schemes. Show that <em>F</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>X / S </em></sub>is representable by an affine étale <em>S</em>-scheme which is of finite presentation over <em>S</em>. </p><p><strong>Exercise H10 </strong>(Lifting criteria) </p><p>(12 points) <br>Let <em>f </em>: <em>X </em>→ <em>S </em>be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite presentation. Consider the following diagram of </p><p><em>S</em>-schemes: </p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><em>T</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">0 </sub></li><li style="flex:1"><em>X</em></li></ul><p></p><p>(1) </p><p><em>f</em></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><em>T</em></li><li style="flex:1"><em>S</em></li></ul><p></p><p>Let C be a class of morphisms of <em>S</em>-schemes. We say that C satisfies the ∃<sub style="top: 0.1782em;">≤1</sub><em>-lifting property </em>(resp. ∃!<em>-lifting property</em>) with respect to <em>f </em>, if for all morphisms <em>T</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">0 </sub>→ <em>T </em>in C and for all diagrams of the form (1) there exists at most (resp. exactly) one morphism of <em>S</em>-schemes <em>T </em>→ <em>X </em>which makes the diagram commutative. Let </p><p>C<sub style="top: 0.1783em;">1 </sub>:= {<em>f </em>: <em>T</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">0 </sub>→ <em>T </em>closed immersion of <em>S</em>-schemes | <em>f </em>is given by a locally nilpotent ideal} <br>C<sub style="top: 0.1783em;">2 </sub>:= {<em>f </em>: <em>T</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">0 </sub>→ <em>T </em>closed immersion of <em>S</em>-schemes | <em>T </em>is affine and <em>T</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">0 </sub>is given by a nilpotent ideal} <br>C<sub style="top: 0.1783em;">3 </sub>:= {<em>f </em>: <em>T</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">0 </sub>→ <em>T </em>closed immersion of <em>S</em>-schemes | <em>T </em>is the spectrum of a local ring and <em>T</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">0 </sub>is given by an ideal <em>I </em>with <em>I</em><sup style="top: -0.3353em;">2 </sup>= 0} </p><p>Show that the following assertions are equivalent: <br>(i) C satisfies the ∃<sub style="top: 0.1783em;">≤1</sub>-lifting property (resp. ∃!-lifting property) with respect to <em>f </em>. <br>(ii) C<sup style="top: -1.1218em;">1 </sup>satisfies the ∃ -lifting property (resp. ∃!-lifting property) with respect to <em>f </em>. <br>(iii) C<sup style="top: -1.1219em;">2</sup><sub style="top: 0.1783em;">3 </sub>satisfies the ∃<sup style="top: -1.1219em;">≤1</sup>-lifting property (resp. ∃!-lifting property) with respect to <em>f </em>. </p><p>≤1 </p><p>You can use the following fact without a proof: For an <em>S </em>scheme <em>Y </em>→ <em>S </em>which is locally of finite presentation and a filtered system of affine <em>S</em>-schemes (Spec(<em>A</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>i</em></sub>) → <em>S</em>)<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>i</em>∈<em>I </em></sub>the canonical map </p><p>colim<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>i</em>∈<em>I </em></sub>(Hom<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>S</em></sub>(Spec(<em>A</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>i</em></sub>), <em>Y </em>)) → Hom<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>S</em></sub>(Spec(colim<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>i</em>∈<em>I </em></sub><em>A</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>i</em></sub>), <em>Y </em>) </p><p>is bijective. </p><p>1</p><p><strong>Exercise H11 </strong>(Vanishing differentials for weakly étale maps) </p><p>(4+8 points) <br>(a) Let <em>R </em>be a ring and <em>I </em>⊆ <em>R </em>be an ideal. Show that <em>R / I </em>is a flat <em>R</em>-module if and only if for all ideals <em>J </em>⊆ <em>R </em>we have </p><p><em>J </em>∩ <em>I </em>= <em>J </em>· <em>I</em>. </p><p>(b) Let <em>f </em>: <em>X </em>→ <em>S </em>be a weakly étale morphism of schemes. Show that <em>Ω</em><sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>f </em></sub>= 0. </p><p><strong>Exercise H12 </strong>(Properties of weakly étale) </p><p>(6+6 points) <br>(a) Let <em>f </em>: <em>X </em>→ <em>S </em>be a morphism of schemes. Show that the following assertions are equivalent: <br>(i) <em>f </em>is weakly étale. </p><p>(ii) The map O<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>S</em>,<em>f </em>(<em>x</em>) </sub>→ O<sub style="top: 0.1783em;"><em>X</em>,<em>x </em></sub>is weakly étale for every <em>x </em>∈ <em>X</em>. </p><p>(b) Let </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><em>X</em><sup style="top: -0.3148em;">0 </sup></li><li style="flex:1"><em>X</em></li></ul><p><em>S</em></p><p>0</p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><em>f</em></li><li style="flex:1"><em>f</em></li></ul><p></p><p><em>S</em><sup style="top: -0.3148em;">0 </sup></p><p><em>g</em></p><p>be a commutative and Cartesian diagram of schemes such that <em>g </em>is faithfully flat. Show that <em>f </em><sup style="top: -0.3148em;">0 </sup>is weakly étale if and only if <em>f </em>is weakly étale. </p><p>2</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages2 Page
-
File Size-