The Eye in the CHARGE Association Br J Ophthalmol: First Published As 10.1136/Bjo.74.7.421 on 1 July 1990

The Eye in the CHARGE Association Br J Ophthalmol: First Published As 10.1136/Bjo.74.7.421 on 1 July 1990

Britishlournal ofOphthalmology, 1990,74,421-426 421 The eye in the CHARGE association Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.74.7.421 on 1 July 1990. Downloaded from I M Russell-Eggitt, K D Blake, D S I Taylor, R K H Wyse Abstract association (vertebral malformation, atresia of CHARGE association includes patients with at the anus, cardiac malformation, trachael fistula, least four features prefixed by the letters of the oesophageal atresia, renal and radial dysplasia, mnemonic: Coloboma, Heart defects, Atresia and limb malformations) may be an expression of of the choanae, Retarded growth and develop- the same defect as the CHARGE association.7 ment, Genital hypoplasia, Ear anomalies and/ Pagon et all and subsequently several other or hearing loss. Many also have facial palsy. authors89 have included in the CHARGE We report a series identified by collaboration association cases of the Di-George syndrome. within one centre of all specialties concerned This is a disorder in development ofthe third and in the management of the CHARGE associa- fourth pharyngeal pouches, with parathyroid tion. Ocular abnormalities were found in 44 out and thymic hypoplasia, cleft palate, micro- of 50 patients with the CHARGE association. gnathia, low-set ears, and heart defects,° now Of these, 41 had 'typical' colobomata. The known sometimes to be due to a deletion in the majority had retinochoroidal colobomata with region 22q1 1 ofchromosome 22. optic nerve involvement, but only 13 patients Davenport et a"l' reported a series of 15 had an iris defect. Two patients had atypical patients with the CHARGE association, with a iris colobomata with normal fundi. Additional similar multidisciplinary ascertainment to our features were microphthalmos in 21 patients, study. In many other reports of the CHARGE optic nerve hypoplasia in four, nystagmus in association there is a bias towards certain abnor- 12, and a vertical disorder of eye movement in malities: the 17 cases described by Hall were four ofthe 22 cases with facial palsy. We report selected on the basis of choanal atresia and an incidence of coloboma in the CHARGE multiple abnormalities.'2 Pagon et all described association of 86% (43/50) compared with a 21 patients all of whom had choanal atresia and/ previous cumulative reported incidence of66% or colobomata. In the most recent review of the (112/170). We believe that there may have been CHARGE association Chestler and France'3 previous underdiagnosis of colobomata in added six further cases with a bias towards children with multiple congenital abnormali- colobomata. ties. In this paper we report the incidence and range ofocular features in the CHARGE associa- http://bjo.bmj.com/ tion. Our aim was to record the largest series to Among the myriad of congenital abnormalities date and to reduce bias of ascertainment by seen in paediatric practice the grouping of cases collaboration, within one centre, ofall specialties where certain features often occur in association concerned in the management of the CHARGE is useful and often precedes understanding ofthe association. aetiology. The CHARGE association includes patients on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. with at least four features prefixed by the letters Patients and methods of the mnemonic: Coloboma, Heart defects, This study describes the ophthalmic features of Atresia of the choanae, Retarded growth and 50 patients with the CHARGE association all of development, Genital hypoplasia. Ear anomalies whom have been seen at one centre. Ascertain- and/or hearing loss.' The diagnosis has become ment of patients, both retrospective and pros- more specific as patients with this phenotype but pective, was through a variety of specialists: a with a known aetiology, such as cat-eye syn- general paediatrician, geneticist, cardiologist, drome (partial tetrasomy 22), Di-George otorhinolaryngologist, and ophthalmologist. syndrome (deletion 22ql 1), and multiple Most cases presented as neonates requiring abnormalities due to teratogens such as retinoic major surgery for congenital heart disease, Department of are or Ophthalmology, acid, excluded. choanal atresia, tracheo-oesophageal fistula. Hospital for Sick Most cases of CHARGE seem to be sporadic. Patients with CHARGE features were screened Children, Great Ormond Environmental or genetic causes may act during this study, if not previously, by all the Street, London similarly. Autosomal dominant pedigrees of for further features. The minimum I M Russell-Eggitt specialists D S I Taylor CHARGE give support to a genetic basis in a criterion for inclusion in our study required that minority of patients.2" The similarities between patients should have at least four of the major Department of Paediatric patients are striking, and there is considerable features in the acronym." There were 28 males Cardiology, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford concordance within dominant pedigrees. In 1981 and 22 females. There were 13 deaths, most Street, London WC1 Pagon et al' described this non-random series of during the first year oflife; those who died had all K D Blake features comprising CHARGE association in undergone at least three non-ophthalmic surgical R K H Wyse order that later splitting by aetiology might be procedures. Correspondence to: D S I Taylor, FRCP, FRCS, possible. Since then it has become clear that The six major systemic features of CHARGE Hospital for Sick Children, facial palsy, renal abnormalities, orofacial clefts, are presented in Table I. Facial palsy was also Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH. and tracheo-oesophageal fistulae also frequently included as a major feature, as it has been Accepted for publication accompany the main features.6 previously reported in at least 40 cases and is an 26 January 1990 Warburg has suggested that the VACTERL otherwise uncommon finding in infancy. 14 422 Russell-Eggitt, Blake, Taylor, Wyse TABLE I The initial letters ofthe acronym CHARGE are TABLE II Thefrequency ofoccurrence ofmajor ocular used to denotefeatures present in each case reported features is tabulated Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.74.7.421 on 1 July 1990. Downloaded from Coloboma Number ofpatients Heart defect Atresia of choanae Right Left Bilateral Total Retardation of growth or development Genital hypoplasia Colobomata Ear abnormalities or deafness Iris 5 2 6 13 palsy of facial nerve Retinochoroidal 7 3 30 40 Optic disc 4 6 27 37 1 CHARGEp 26 H RGEp Eyelid 1 2 CHARGE 27* CHAR E Microphthalmos 7 6 8 21 3* C AR Ep 28 CHARGEp Squint 17 4* CHAR E 29 CH RGE Nystagmus 12 5 CHARGEp 30 CH RGE 6 C RGE 31* CHAR Ep 7 CH R Ep 32* CH R Ep 8 CH RGE 33* C AR E 9 CH RGEp 34 CH RGE Colobomata affected the posterior segment in 10 CHA GEp 35 CH RGEp 11 HARGE 36* CHAR Ep 38/50 cases (bilateral in 32). Two additional cases 12* CHA E 37* CHAR Ep had gross microphthalmos of the fellow eye, and 13 CHA GEp 38* CHAR E 14 C RGEp 39 CH RGEp in all but seven eyes the optic disc was involved. 15 CHARGE 40* CH R E In some cases the coloboma was very subtle, 16* CHAR E 41 H RGEp 17 CHARGEp 42* CH R E but nonetheless of diagnostic importance: three 18 C ARGE 43 CH RGE patients had iris colobomata which involved 19* CHAR Ep 44* CH R E 20* CHAR Ep 45* HAR E only part of the stroma, and two patients with 21 CH RGEp 46* HAR E posterior colobomata had only a small defect in 22 CHARGE 47* CH R E 23* HAR E 48 CH RGE the retinal pigment epithelium just below and 24* CHAR Ep 49 CH RGE nasal to the optic disc. The optic disc in these 25 CHARGE 50* C AR E patients had a hyperpigmented border, especi- *Denotes female. ally temporally, and in one eye this was the only abnormality, but the fellow eye had a disc Genital abnormalities were apparent only in the coloboma with inferonasal chorioretinal thin- males. ning with scleral ectasia (Figs IA, IB). Microphthalmos was bilateral in eight patients, right sided in seven, and left in six, but Results was mild in the majority. Only one eye of three patients had no useful vision. KARYOTYPES Optic nerve hypoplasia was noted in patients Chromosome analysis was performed in 48/50 19, 30, 41, and 50. In all these cases the eye with of the patients and an abnormality in blood the hypoplastic disc was the better seeing eye, chromosomes was confirmed only in case 36, with an acuity range of 6/6-6/18. Only patient 50 http://bjo.bmj.com/ which had an apparently balanced translocation had a pigmented optic disc border, and none had ofchromosomes 6 and 8. the double pigmented ring sign of optic nerve hypoplasia. Two patients (17 and 41) had unilateral per- OCULAR FINDINGS sistent hyperplastic primary vitreous (without a The ocular features of the individual patients are fundal view), case 17 had a 'typical' coloboma summarised in Table II. Ocular abnormalities (that is, occurring along the embryonic fissure), on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. were found in 44/50 patients (88%); 41 (82%) while case 41 had hypoplasia of the fellow optic of these had a 'typical' coloboma of varying disc. Patient 47 had partial upper lid colobomata, severity. Two patients had atypical iris colobo- and two cases (9 and 47) had blockage of the mata with normal fundi: case 8 had a unilateral nasolacrimal duct. upper nasal defect and case 48 had bilateral nasal One patient (18) had cataract in association defects. with retinal detachment, and case 17 had spon- Figure 1: The right optic disc ofcase 50 has a hyperpigmented border, the visual acuity is 6/6 with a -3-00 dioptre sphere.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us