COP18 Zimbabwe PEPFAR Funding – COP18 Period: 1 October 2018 to 30 September 2019

COP18 Zimbabwe PEPFAR Funding – COP18 Period: 1 October 2018 to 30 September 2019

COP18 Zimbabwe PEPFAR Funding – COP18 Period: 1 October 2018 to 30 September 2019 Total Funding: $145,541,203 • testing, treatment (including drugs), DREAMS, prevention, laboratory, strategic information, HIV/TB, systems strengthening • VMMC: $32,384,807 • OVC: $17,838,563 COP17 to COP18 – Reach 90% ART Coverage in all sub-populations 3 How the picture has changed in 10 years 2008 2018 4 A population level perspective of the HIV epidemic 5 2 years post-ZIMPHIA data collection: ZIMPHIA Where we stand NOW with progress towards epidemic control Males 100% 78% 76% 73% 75% 62% 66% 53% 65% 57% 50% 25% 0% <15 15-24 25-49 50+ Total PLHIV Known Status On ART VLS Females 94% 100% 85% 85% 80% 72% 75% 75% 58% 65% 50% 25% 0% <15 15-24 25-49 50+ Total PLHIV Known Status On ART VLS 6 Geographic ART coverage by end FY18, with absolute number of PLHIV left to find 7 2017 ART Coverage & Absolute Treatment Number Gap Total Gap Total Abs District PLHIV All Ages F 15-19 M 15-19 F 20-24 M 20-24 F-25-29 M 25-29 F 30-49 M 30-49 F 50+ M 50+ (All Ages Number & Sexes) (All Ages & Sexes) 01 National 1,315,900 92% 86% 98% 71% 89% 88% 84% 70% 75% 66% 85% 201,302 Harare 222,000 76% 98% 83% 66% 101% 98% 82% 66% 57% 50% 79% 46,224 Bulawayo 80,600 148% 112% 122% 94% 113% 103% 86% 74% 70% 67% 91% 7,412 Zvimba District 34,730 69% 48% 93% 48% 176% 252% 53% 52% 51% 42% 73% 9,299 Hurungwe District 34,300 97% 85% 133% 96% 115% 134% 87% 81% 75% 63% 96% 1,426 Mutare District 33,290 75% 69% 98% 76% 143% 128% 82% 72% 88% 71% 90% 3,437 Kwekwe District 32,610 84% 112% 125% 89% 77% 98% 81% 75% 85% 76% 88% 3,940 Gweru District 32,080 78% 80% 84% 61% 94% 99% 98% 77% 86% 75% 92% 2,454 Masvingo District 30,150 105% 87% 100% 71% 91% 92% 79% 61% 87% 70% 82% 5,353 Chegutu District 28,160 173% 123% 184% 88% 135% 145% 104% 88% 58% 51% 105% -1,433 Goromonzi District 27,310 84% 57% 69% 36% 92% 51% 82% 68% 53% 65% 75% 6,861 Gokwe South District 26,100 95% 79% 107% 71% 76% 82% 79% 64% 71% 70% 81% 4,899 Mazowe District 25,390 68% 71% 74% 61% 142% 177% 78% 73% 65% 50% 87% 3,423 Murewa District 24,330 119% 86% 76% 43% 73% 61% 64% 55% 66% 61% 68% 7,715 Makoni District 23,130 91% 72% 118% 91% 223% 262% 67% 63% 86% 83% 95% 1,054 Mberengwa District 23,100 93% 70% 75% 52% 67% 61% 68% 49% 102% 77% 72% 6,437 Chipinge District 22,800 74% 52% 100% 86% 143% 150% 68% 49% 65% 47% 75% 5,736 Marondera District 22,640 174% 177% 117% 107% 98% 99% 81% 56% 60% 69% 83% 3,756 Chiredzi District 22,620 78% 71% 93% 105% 150% 145% 87% 81% 95% 72% 98% 441 Gwanda District 20,390 116% 99% 100% 97% 96% 141% 95% 69% 95% 83% 96% 744 Mount Darwin District 19,630 95% 77% 100% 78% 163% 165% 45% 38% 60% 43% 71% 5,682 Gutu District 18,980 81% 133% 83% 44% 87% 79% 75% 52% 97% 67% 79% 3,936 Tsholotsho District 18,330 118% 93% 78% 32% 170% 139% 68% 44% 131% 105% 91% 1,732 Buhera District 18,080 143% 164% 117% 124% 241% 241% 86% 79% 128% 146% 122% -4,027 Makonde District 18,030 135% 112% 202% 186% 142% 154% 106% 94% 97% 79% 120% -3,565 Beitbridge District 18,000 61% 63% 90% 60% 103% 85% 98% 70% 96% 63% 89% 1,931 Chivi District 16,150 97% 112% 160% 78% 193% 141% 68% 49% 90% 100% 93% 1,084 Bulilima District 14,850 86% 63% 96% 41% 108% 91% 65% 46% 77% 59% 74% 3,915 Zaka District 14,150 111% 121% 94% 45% 113% 101% 98% 65% 147% 95% 102% -229 Mwenezi District 14,050 128% 113% 112% 71% 109% 108% 94% 71% 122% 84% 101% -141 Lupane District 13,540 103% 111% 74% 46% 65% 63% 86% 94% 140% 139% 99% 108 Umguza District 13,380 51% 38% 53% 36% 60% 70% 50% 53% 87% 81% 60% 5,312 Insiza District 13,090 86% 62% 98% 56% 105% 86% 83% 71% 90% 66% 87% 1,696 Kadoma District 12,870 169% 124% 237% 185% 213% 235% 111% 105% 129% 73% 139% -4,978 Mutasa District 12,540 110% 71% 129% 102% 196% 220% 78% 72% 93% 70% 99% 145 Nkayi District 12,490 94% 89% 92% 42% 115% 117% 65% 58% 109% 120% 86% 1,739 Matobo District 12,230 85% 81% 98% 38% 121% 85% 81% 57% 99% 82% 88% 1,525 Mangwe District 11,970 67% 97% 82% 45% 127% 133% 96% 87% 116% 122% 105% -599 Umzingwane District 11,160 118% 73% 112% 43% 85% 53% 58% 55% 122% 72% 74% 2,871 Guruve District 10,830 77% 87% 109% 86% 90% 117% 85% 68% 64% 47% 86% 1,566 Bubi District 9,900 58% 40% 62% 21% 81% 74% 59% 54% 81% 78% 67% 3,277 Proportion of National ART patients supported by PEPFAR 1,200,000 83% 90% 80% 1,000,000 73% 70% 800,000 60% 50% 600,000 38% increase in patients 40% supported in 400,000 12mos 30% 20% 200,000 10% - 0% 2016 2017 PEPFAR MOHCC Trajectory towards 95-95-95 1,600,000 1,437,629 1,400,000 1,338,826 1,200,000 1,136,503 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 - PLHIV Current on ART National Target PEPFAR Target 10 Traditionally siloed HTC models vs. an Integrated HTS model An integrated HIV testing model: Self-testing leveraged 1. PITC & CITC across all steps 2. Index Testing & Contact Tracing 3. Targeted outreach for those not coming to facilities All together: High yield in Index Testing—High volumes with PITC FY18Q1 Modality: contribution to positives (yield) % Yield by Modality Facility Index: 0.11% (33%) Comm. Index: 7% (40%) Targeted Mobile: 3% (15%) PITC: 89% (5%) Facility VCT: 0.6% (14%) Comm. VCT: 0.6% (12%) We need all of the modalities in the: % HIV_POS by Modality • Right place • Right time • Right sub-population 12 We are not letting up: Still Finding HTS_POS in High ART Coverage Districts 1200 120% 115% 1000 115% 111% 800 110% 600 105% Number HTS_POS 400 99% 99% 100% 200 95% 0 90% Buhera Chegutu Makonde Mangwe Districts FY17 Q2 FY17 Q3 FY17 Q4 FY18Q1 ART coverage 13 And where we are not performing we are intensifying efforts in facilities Improvement in 7 Harare Sites with intensified PITC • HIV tests average weekly increase from 399 to 2207 • HTS_POS average weekly increase from 28 to 128 • 80% of positives were linked to ART 14 And maximizing community platforms: finding positives through Sexual Network Testing • 8 HIV+ identified • 7 initiated on ART • Ages 22-55 yrs • 4 weeks • 128km covered 15 Where are men being diagnosed? 16 What have we learned? → So what are we doing? Interagency learning & collaboration allows us to more rapidly apply successful approaches • Leveraging the facility platform → scaling up iPITC model • Index testing works → expanding index testing model • Targeted Mobile Testing finds people who won’t come to facilities → using this strategically • Self testing could be a game changer → scaling it up 17 PEPFAR Zimbabwe integrated HIV Testing Model (iHTS) Maximizing successful strategies to find sub-populations MoHCC Health Facilities • Verbal screening and routine testing • HRH & technical assistance Facilities Support Client Initiated Testing (VCT) • Client options: (1) Self-testing; (2) Conventional provider delivered HTC • Key population friendly Index Testing Facility Community • Written invitation sent home • F/u with phone call & home visit • Test return clients • Test sexual partners & at-risk HIV Self-Testing • F/u non-return in Community children • Used strategically in all modalities • PEPFAR procured kits & leverage UNITAID Kits Targeted Community Outreach Contact Tracing • Based on sub-population need • Trace sexual partners in community • Prioritize geographic areas & off hours • Test sexual partners & at-risk children National 46,224 PLHIV Gap 3,000-10,000 PLHIV Gap Adjust the intensity of PEPFAR support & Harare 17 Districts testing modalities to reach 95-95-95 by district & by sub-population High ART Gap High ART Gap 1,500—3,000 PLHIV Gap <1,500 PLHIV Gap 8 Districts 7 Districts 0 PLHIV Gap 7 Districts Maintenance Medium ART Gap Low ART Gap Transition of HTS program inputs from High ART Gap districts to no-ART gap districts 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Case-based 0% surveillance High Medium Low No Gap (>9,500) (3,000-9,499) (1-2,999) Facility-based Testing w/HRH TA only Facility-based Testing Facility Index Community-based testing Comm Index Community-based testing Outreach Transition of HTS program inputs from High ART Gap districts to no-ART gap districts 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Case-based 0% surveillance High Medium Low No Gap (>9,500) (3,000-9,499) (1-2,999) Facility-based Testing w/HRH TA only Facility-based Testing Facility Index Community-based testing Comm Index Community-based testing Outreach Linking all HIV+ to treatment and care Zimbabwe adopted Treat All in 2016 Expanding differentiated models of care OVC partner and health facility linkages 23 As we reach 95-95-95: linkage is improving & yield is declining FY16 Q1: 54% Linkage & 8% yield FY18 Q1:74% Linkage & 6% yield 24 Community ART Initiation Increases Linkage 1200 100% 89% ART initiation rate: 89% Introduction of community ART 90% 1000 80% 70% 800 60% 600 50% 40% 400 Number of individuals 30% Proportion initiated on ART on initiatedProportion 20% 200 10% 0 0% Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Tested HIV Positive Initiated on ART ART Initiation Rate 25 New on ART and Adhering to Treatment Differentiated Models of Care Multi-month Scripting & Dispensing Community & Family Refill Groups 26 Leveraging Community Presence: Defaulter Tracking October 2016—September 2017 October 2017—December 2017 • Total defaulters identified: 9,707 • Total defaulters identified: 1,357 • Total in care: 8,348 (86%) • Total in care: 1,263 (93%) • Returned to care: 5,630 (58%) • Returned to care: 1,099 (81%) • Still in care: 2,718 (28%) • Still in care: 164 (12%) 1% 3% 3% 6% 3% 4% 7% 6% 10% 28% 58% Improved 81% 18% collaboration & documentation 2828 Differentiated Models of Care to Keep People on Treatment

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    53 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us