Arthropods Associated with Above-Ground Portions of the Invasive Tree, Melaleuca Quinquenervia, in South Florida, Usa

Arthropods Associated with Above-Ground Portions of the Invasive Tree, Melaleuca Quinquenervia, in South Florida, Usa

300 Florida Entomologist 86(3) September 2003 ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED WITH ABOVE-GROUND PORTIONS OF THE INVASIVE TREE, MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA, IN SOUTH FLORIDA, USA SHERYL L. COSTELLO, PAUL D. PRATT, MIN B. RAYAMAJHI AND TED D. CENTER USDA-ARS, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3205 College Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314 ABSTRACT Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S. T. Blake, the broad-leaved paperbark tree, has invaded ca. 202,000 ha in Florida, including portions of the Everglades National Park. We performed prerelease surveys in south Florida to determine if native or accidentally introduced arthro- pods exploit this invasive plant species and assess the potential for higher trophic levels to interfere with the establishment and success of future biological control agents. Herein we quantify the abundance of arthropods present on the above-ground portions of saplings and small M. quinquenervia trees at four sites. Only eight of the 328 arthropods collected were observed feeding on M. quinquenervia. Among the arthropods collected in the plants adven- tive range, 19 species are agricultural or horticultural pests. The high percentage of rare species (72.0%), presumed to be transient or merely resting on the foliage, and the paucity of species observed feeding on the weed, suggests that future biological control agents will face little if any competition from pre-existing plant-feeding arthropods. Key Words: Paperbark tree, arthropod abundance, Oxyops vitiosa, weed biological control RESUMEN Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S. T. Blake ha invadido ca. 202,000 ha en la Florida, inclu- yendo unas porciones del Parque Nacional de los Everglades. Nosotros realizamos sondeos preliminares en el sur de la Florida para determinar si los artópodos nativos o accidental- mente introducidos explotan esta especie de planta invasora y evaluar el potencial de los ni- veles tróficos superiores para interferir con el establecimento y éxito de futuros agentes de control biológico. En cuatro sitios, nosotros cuantificamos la abundancia de artópodos presen- tes en las porciones sobre el terreno de los renuevos y pequeños arboles de M. quinquenervia. Solamente ocho de los 328 artópodos recolectados fueron observados alimentandose en la M. quinquenervia. Entre los artópodos colectados en las áreas no nativas de la planta, 19 especies son plagas agrícolas ó de hortalizas. El alto percentaje de especies raras (72.0%), presumidos de ser transeúntes o meramente descansando en el follaje, y la escasez de especies observadas alimentandose de la maleza, sujiere que los futuros agentes de control biológico enfrentarán poca o ninguna competencia de los artópodos herbivoras ya presentes en la planta. Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake, the Melaleuca infested areas can be restored broad-leaved paperbark tree, was introduced into through removal of existing trees, followed by south Florida during the late 1800s (Thayer & Bo- measures to preempt reinvasion and subsequent dle 1990). Although threatened in its native range recruitment. Conventional control tactics com- along the east coast of Australia and a few nearby bine mechanical and chemical means to eliminate South Pacific islands, life history characteristics seedlings, saplings, entire stands of mature trees, of M. quinquenervia (melaleuca) combine with fa- or isolated plants in sensitive areas (Stocker & vorable ecological characteristics of Everglades Sanders 1981; Bodle et al. 1994). However, biolog- habitats to make this tree an explosive weed in ical attributes of this weed necessitate repeated south Florida (Meskimen 1962; Myers 1983; Bal- mechanical and chemical treatments, which im- ciunas & Center 1991; Hofstetter 1991). Cur- pose an accumulation of negative impacts on non- rently, melaleuca occurs on about 202,000 ha of target organisms, including endangered plants. Florida wetlands (Bodle et al. 1994) and has his- These adverse impacts limit the frequent use of torically spread at a rate of about 2,850 ha/yr such methods. In contrast, classical weed biologi- (Center et al. 2000). The negative impacts of cal control has been described as the most ecolog- melaleuca on native flora and public health prob- ically benign tactic for controlling exotic pests lems have been documented (Di Stefano & Fisher (McEvoy & Coombs 1999) and has been consid- 1983; Myers 1983; Molnar et al. 1991; Bodle et al. ered a desirable addition to conventional methods 1994). Diamond et al. (1991), for instance, deter- (Browder & Schroeder 1981; Bodle et al. 1994). mined that if unchecked, potential losses to the Development of a weed biological control pro- Florida economy as a result of this invasive tree gram typically proceeds in a stepwise fashion, could reach $169 million annually. including: selection of a natural enemy, risk Costello et al.: Arthropods of Melaleuca quinquenervia 301 analysis, release, monitoring establishment, and To suppress melaleuca growth, land managers finally assessing the effectiveness and ecological mowed trees at ca. 6-month intervals, resulting in impact of the introduced biological control agent coppices 0.5-2 m in height. These coppicing (Harris 1975; McEvoy & Coombs 1999). An often clumps formed a dense, nearly continuous canopy recommended initial phase in a classical weed bio- of leaves with 4,406 clumps/ha. In contrast to the logical control program includes surveys of herbi- previous sites, the soil type was primarily sand, vores associated with the invasive weed in the new consistent with an invaded pine flatwoods habitat (adventive) geographic range (Harris 1975; Olck- type (Anonymous 1990). Other than melaleuca, ers & Hulley 1995). Such surveys are intended to the subdominant vegetation included Ludwigia identify herbivores already exploiting the weed sp., Centella asiatica (L.) Urb., Rhynchospora and to ascertain whether niche competition could globularis (Chapm.) Small, Rhynchospora eximia influence agent establishment and impact (Harris (Nees) Boeck., and Rhynchospora filifolia Gray. 1971). Although surveys for natural enemies were Site 4 consisted of a 1 ha area within histori- performed in Australia during 1987 to 1991 (Balci- cally mesic flatwoods in the Picayune Forest, unas et al. 1995), surveys of arthropods associated Collier Co., FL (N26.10478 and W81.63392) with melaleuca in its adventive range had never (Anonymous 1990). A fire burned much of the been done. Failure to perform such surveys could melaleuca dominated areas during June 1998, re- increase costs due to wasted effort associated with sulting in recruitment of 129,393 trees/ha com- selecting, screening and releasing herbivores that posed of primarily small 1-2 m tall saplings, may already be present, having accompanied the interspersed with an occasional large, mature invasive weed upon introduction or thereafter. tree. Pinus elliottii Engelm. and a parasitic (dod- Therefore, specific objectives of this study were: 1) der-like) species growing on the melaleuca were assess the current abundance of arthropods asso- the only other common vegetation. ciated with melaleuca in south Florida, 2) deter- Surveys were conducted monthly at each site mine if native herbivores are exploiting the from November 2000 through June 2001. Sites invasive plant, 3) determine if co-evolved natural were surveyed between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on enemies from the native range inadvertently ac- days without precipitation. To survey arthropods companied melaleuca into south Florida, and 4) associated with melaleuca canopies, we swept fo- inventory those higher trophic levels associated liage, and occasionally trunks, with a 90-cm-di- with the plant that could potentially interfere with ameter sweep net. One sample consisted of 100 the establishment or impact of introduced biologi- sweeps in a 180° sweeping motion spaced ca. 1.0 m cal control agents. apart along a randomly selected 100 m transect. Four samples along separate transects were col- MATERIALS AND METHODS lected each month. The contents of the net after 100 sweeps were emptied into a 3.78 liter sealable Arthropod surveys were performed at four loca- plastic bag and frozen at -19 (±1) °C until pro- tions in south Florida. Site 1 was located near cessed. Arthropods were then separated from Ft. Lauderdale, Broward Co., FL (N26.05606 and plant material, sorted by morphological types, W80.25168). The site was a 0.5 ha field consisting and stored in 70% ethanol. of 2 to 5 m tall trees occurring at a plant density of One limitation of our sweep sampling method ca. 21,560 trees/ha. In general, melaleuca trees included collecting arthropods that were not were growing in high organic soils typical of re- closely associated with melaleuca, but were tran- claimed ‘glades’ systems. Although melaleuca was sients, merely resting on the plant foliage or dis- the dominant species, other plants commonly oc- turbed from understory vegetation while curring in the site included Blechnum serrulatum sampling. Additionally, this method was biased to- Rich., Ampelopsis arborea (L.) Koehne, Vitis aesti- wards those species that are poor fliers or slow to valis Michx., and Ludwigia peruviana (L.) H. Hara. disperse from a disturbance and, unlike previous Site 2 was located under a power line right-of- Australian surveys, endophages were not in- way near Weston, Broward Co., FL (N26.035483 cluded. Therefore, caution should be used when and W80.43495). Prior to 1997 land managers cut drawing inferences from these data due to the un- melaleuca trees near their bases, resulting in multi- known relationships between

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us