Legitimacy in the New Regulatory State

Legitimacy in the New Regulatory State

LEGITIMACY IN THE NEW REGULATORY STATE KAREN LEE A THESIS IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY FACULTY OF LAW MARCH 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... I PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ARISING FROM THE WRITING OF THE THESIS .. III GLOSSARY AND TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................. IV CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 I JUSTIFICATION FOR RESEARCH AND ITS APPROACH .......................................... 4 A THE NEED FOR EMPIRICAL STUDY OF INDUSTRY RULE-MAKING ....................... 4 B PART 6 RULE-MAKING ....................................................................................... 7 1 THE COMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE ................................................................ 8 2 CONSUMER CODES ....................................................................................... 10 C PROCEDURAL AND INSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY, RESPONSIVENESS AND THEIR CRITERIA ......................................................................................................... 11 II TERMINOLOGY ................................................................................................ 15 A CONSUMER AND PUBLIC INTERESTS................................................................. 15 1 CONSUMER INTEREST .................................................................................. 16 2 PUBLIC INTEREST ......................................................................................... 17 III STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS ............................................................................. 18 PART I ..................................................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER 2 THE ADOPTION OF PART 6 OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1997 (CTH) ..................................................................................................................... 23 I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 23 II BACKGROUND INFORMATION .......................................................................... 24 A MARKET LIBERALISATION ............................................................................... 25 1 CHRONOLOGY .............................................................................................. 25 2 RATIONALE .................................................................................................. 26 B THE HILMER REPORT ....................................................................................... 27 C THE CASUALTIES OF TELECOM ........................................................................ 28 III THE REGULATORY DESIGN OF PART 6 ............................................................. 32 A THE REGULATORY PROBLEM ........................................................................... 32 B THE POLICY GOALS ......................................................................................... 34 C THE POSSIBLE REGULATORY OPTIONS AND THEIR BENEFITS AND COSTS ....... 34 1 GENERAL CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PRIVACY LEGISLATION ................ 35 2 EX ANTE INDUSTRY SPECIFIC RULES ........................................................... 36 3 INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION ..................................................................... 36 4 THE PART 6 FRAMEWORK ............................................................................ 37 IV CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER 3 THE CHALLENGES OF INDUSTRY RULE-MAKING ...................................... 43 I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 43 II THE RULE-MAKING FRAMEWORK OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE ........ 45 III THE PROCEDURAL AND INSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY OF TRADITIONAL RULE- MAKING ........................................................................................................... 47 A THE MEANING OF REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY .......................................... 50 1 UNITARY, SELF-CORRECTING DEMOCRACY .................................................. 51 2 PLURALISM .................................................................................................. 52 3 REPUBLICANISM........................................................................................... 54 4 THE COMMON PRINCIPLES OF REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY .................... 55 5 OVERLAPS WITH LEGISPRUDENTIAL THEORIES ............................................ 56 B INSTITUTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL MANIFESTATIONS OF DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES IN LEGISLATIVE RULE-MAKING .................................................... 60 C INSTITUTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL MANIFESTATIONS OF DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES IN ADMINISTRATIVE RULE-MAKING ............................................. 62 1 IMPARTIALITY .............................................................................................. 63 2 TRANSPARENCY ........................................................................................... 63 3 DELIBERATION ............................................................................................. 65 4 ACCOUNTABILITY ........................................................................................ 66 D CONCLUSION .................................................................................................... 67 IV THE DIFFICULTIES AND THREATS POSED BY INDUSTRY RULE-MAKING .......... 68 A PARTIALITY ..................................................................................................... 69 B MINIMAL TRANSPARENCY ............................................................................... 69 C TAINTED DELIBERATION .................................................................................. 70 D ACCOUNTABILITY DEFICITS ............................................................................. 71 V CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 72 PART II ..................................................................................................................... 75 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................. 77 I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 77 II METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 78 A INITIAL IDEA .................................................................................................... 80 B SUPPORT FROM THE COMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE .......................................... 81 C NO ASSISTANCE FROM ACMA ........................................................................ 82 D POSSIBILITY OF AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY ..................................................... 83 E DETERMINING THE THREE CODES FOR IN-DEPTH STUDY ................................. 84 F CHARACTERISING THE RULE-MAKING PROCESS .............................................. 85 G CLARIFYING TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................ 87 H INTERVIEW QUESTIONS AND THE DELEGATES’ DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY ... 88 I IDENTIFYING AND LOCATING INTERVIEW PARTICIPANTS ................................. 89 J CONDUCT OF INTERVIEWS ............................................................................... 89 K THE LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH ............................................................... 90 L CONCLUSION .................................................................................................... 94 III BACKGROUND INFORMATION USEFUL TO UNDERSTANDING THE CASE STUDIES ........................................................................................................................ 95 A COMMON STRUCTURE OF THE CONSUMER CODE CASE STUDIES ..................... 95 B INDUSTRY INFORMATION ................................................................................. 95 1 TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................................. 95 2 STRUCTURE OF THE RELEVANT ‘SECTIONS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY’ .................................................................................................. 97 (A) THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INDUSTRY ................................. 97 (I) FIXED-LINE VOICE ............................................................................. 98 (II) MOBILE SERVICES .............................................................................. 98 (III) INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES .............................................................. 99 (IV) OTHER ................................................................................................ 99 (B) THE CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT (HANDSET) MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY ..... ............................................................................................................. 100 (C) MOBILE PREMIUM SERVICES INDUSTRY ............................................... 100 C REGULATORY BODIES .................................................................................... 101 1 ROLES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE ACMA, ACCC AND TIO ......................... 102 2 COMPOSITION OF AND DECISION-MAKING BY ACMA ..............................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    373 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us