13 the Rush to Scale: Lessons Being Learned in Indonesia

13 the Rush to Scale: Lessons Being Learned in Indonesia

PLA Notes CD-ROM 1988–2001 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 13 The rush to scale: lessons being learned in Indonesia Nilanjana Mukherjee · Introduction (particularly more women) in decision making and be based on better analysis of the causes of local problems. A training programme for UNICEF became involved in integrating village level ‘facilitators’ of the improved participatory approaches into the nation-wide planning process had already been prepared by a system for village development planning in foreign consultant using ZOPP methodology. Indonesia about 18 months ago. This paper is a However, its field testing during March-April chronology of the events to date. Readers may 1995 did not satisfy all the requirements. draw their own conclusions from the story. This is, perhaps, a good example of what can happen The Department of Home Affairs has a group of when participatory approaches are national trainers. They wished to gain wider institutionalised, what it takes to make a exposure to the participatory planning methods difference, how far one can expect to go and being used in other developing countries and things that can and cannot be controlled and adapt what was relevant to the conditions in why. Indonesia. In response, UNICEF arranged a one-day exposure seminar in April 1995 for Formulation of annual plans for village national government personnel, including development has been a feature of rural life in presentations from a range of international PRA Indonesia for more than a decade. Every practitioners and Indonesian NGOs. As a result January the Department of Home Affairs sets of the seminar, the Government Departments the process in motion. Sub-district and PKK (Women’s Family Welfare administrative chiefs notify village heads that Movement: a nation-wide women’s NGO that they should schedule community consultation includes the wives of all government personnel) meetings to come up with proposals for village requested longer and more in-depth learning improvement. The proposals usually include about PRA. resource sharing commitments between the villagers and different government departments. UNICEF supported a two-week study visit to These are examined and progressively India for key government officials and trainers consolidated at sub-district, district, provincial from the Departments of Home Affairs, PKK, and national levels. Information about approved Adult Education, Social Affairs and Health. The proposals passes down the same levels in 12-day study programme on ‘PRA applications reverse order and funds follow. What is for rural development’ was organised by requested is not necessarily the same as what is OUTREACH at Bangalore, India during received. The process takes 12-14 months. August-September 1995. During the planning of the 1995-2000 country programme of collaboration with the · Training targets Government of Indonesia, UNICEF was requested to help improve the quality of this The national trainers had been instructed to re- bottom-up planning process. Joint reviews of the write the training module developed and tested existing process were undertaken in six in April 1995. They did this by referring to provinces in early 1995. They revealed that the available manuals and books documenting PRA process needed to focus more on human and RRA experiences. The training manual was development, involve larger community groups completed before the study visit. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Source: PLA Notes (1996), Issue 27, pp.57–60, IIED London PLA Notes CD-ROM 1988–2001 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ A central government directive was sent out to The new elements in the module were the all 27 provinces of the country in early June. incorporation of three techniques from the PRA This instructed local government that, starting in repertoire: resource mapping, seasonal the 1995-96 cycle, bottom-up planning in calendars, Venn diagramming. Information from villages of Indonesia would follow a these methods was to be transferred into a series participatory process called the ‘P3MD’ of 11 tables for processing into a Village Perencanaan Partisipatif Pembangunan Development Plan. Masyarakat Desa, which means Participatory Village Development Planning. Everybody agreed that the product and the planned process left much to be desired. Training modules were scheduled to be However, it was felt to be sufficient for the produced centrally by October 1995 and current year in fulfilling the government’s despatched to provinces, districts and sub- commitment announced in June 1995. It was districts. Provincial trainers and village council also felt best to learn through experimentation heads would be trained in December 1995. and that improvements could be made the Following this training, village council heads following year, based on the experiences in the were to facilitate participatory planning in their current year. villages during February-March 1996. Government funds had been officially allocated There was no way to stem the tide of instant for this 4-day training in over 60,000 villages replication and mass scale training. The planned within the 1995-96 budget year ending in March schedule was implemented relentlessly in 27 1996. provinces and the budgets duly spent within the financial year. We were invited to observe the From the outset, the planned schedule, target process and provide feedback to central group for training, budget and the 4-day training decisionmakers. plan appeared to be beyond discussion and possibility of modification. The funds had to be The trainers observed were generally utilised before March 1996. Furthermore, the unprepared for their role. They agreed with the provincial government had been given explicit objective of empowering the community but instructions along with the June directive on were unaware of how to foster the process of how to use the funds based on the 4-day training empowerment. During the training of village plan. However, upon return from Bangalore the heads, the trainers: tended to rely on overhead national trainers’ team decided to re-write their transparencies reproducing text directly from the earlier training manual. This was achieved under training manual, provided too much direction close supervision of the Director and real for exercises to be completed by community pressure of meeting the printer’s deadline. groups, asked leading questions and provided lengthy ‘correct’ answers themselves. The The 11-volume training package was in press by fundamental principles of learning and November. This allowed very little opportunity discovering together with their trainees seemed for consultation with anyone outside the four incompatible with their own perception of their members of the writing team. Field testing was role as trainers. not feasible, given the time frame. Trainings were conducted for 60 to 70 people at Compromises had to be made to fit all the a time in order to meet the deadlines. Reports officially specified contents into the 4-day from observers of the village level planning that training module for trainers and the 3-day followed show that little has changed in terms of module for village heads. Field-based methods process and outputs this year as compared to inevitably became classroom-based and the time previous years. constraints allowed only “teaching” rather than le arning. Attitudes and behaviours received little A summary of observations and lessons learned attention in the module because departmental has been compiled at the Department of Home trainers at provincial and district levels had had Affairs, using all the feedback received from prior training in communication skills. departmental as well as external observers. To date there has been no review dialogue on the subject. However some basic premises have ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Source: PLA Notes (1996), Issue 27, pp.57–60, IIED London PLA Notes CD-ROM 1988–2001 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ been revised. For example, the village teams of people who supported our approach and analysts are to trained in the next phase rather building up a critical mass of opinion. We will than just the village heads. The five-person team continue to support dialogues, promote alliances will also have to have at least 2 women, and reflection, bringing more and varied people including the village PKK (women’s NGO) into the picture leader. The core national trainers’ group is working on revising the training modules again, An interactive learning environment is alien to within their small, select group. most bureaucracies, especially large government systems. Training programmes are easy to · What can we learn from our design. Fostering an interactive learning experience? environment is infinitely more difficult, particularly in top-down, hierarchical organisations where unquestioning respect for We began with a situation where there was, authority is integral to social and cultural life. allegedly, institutional support and interest in To achieve an interactive learning environment, participatory approaches. The political climate the change must come from within and it is was turning more favourable. Terms like important

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us