1st National Salinity Engineering Conference 9–12 November 2004 Perth, Western Australia Impacts of drainage disposal on biodiversity in wetlands of the Western Australian wheatbelt. S. A. Halse Department of Conservation and Land Management, PO Box 51, Wanneroo 6946 stuarth@calm.wa.gov.au Abstract: The Western Australian wheatbelt has rich wetland associated plant and animal communities. Most of them occur in or around freshwater wetlands but a significant proportion of species, especially plants, are found at naturally saline sites where the level of endemism is high. Some naturally, as well as many secondarily, saline wetlands are likely to be used as receiving bodies for saline drainage water from agricultural land. Principles of sustainable development and environmental responsibility require that there is assessment of the likely impacts on plants and animals at these wetlands. These impacts are not easily predicted but increased hydroperiod may be at least as important a cause of impact as increased salinity. The relationship between species occurrence and salinity is comparatively well documented; there is very limited information on the relationship with acidity, which may increase as a result of deep drainage, and the relationship between species occurrence and hydroperiod is poorly understood. Little is known about trophic cascades that may occur as a result of loss of species. In this paper, I summarise the biodiversity values of wetlands in the wheatbelt, as well as existing information on species responses to changes in salinity, acidity and hydroperiod to indicate the possible impacts of drainage. In association with this information, a scheme to evaluate the suitability of wetlands for receiving drainage is presented. Keywords: salinity, hydroperiod, invertebrates, waterbirds, plants 1. INTRODUCTION few pools. Wetlands varied from ephemeral to seasonal. The extensive stands of trees (or dead Rivers in the wheatbelt of south-west Western trees) across the beds of many wheatbelt lakes is Australia arise in an old landscape with low rainfall evidence of this seasonality [Froend et al., 1997; and very little topographic relief. As a result, Halse et al., 1993a]. natural drainage systems east of the Meckering Line are poorly defined and river valleys can be The result of agricultural clearing has been to tens of kilometres wide. Prior to clearing of natural increase run-off [George and Conacher, 1993] and vegetation for agriculture, there was stream flow to raise water-tables and water salinities via the only after major storm events in either summer or process of secondary salinisation [Clarke et al., winter and the flow was usually of short duration 2002]. There has been approximately a 10-fold [Hatton and Ruprecht, 2002]. Wetlands east of the increase in the spatial extent of salinity since Meckering Line were ephemeral. clearing [Hatton and Ruprecht, 2002] and the combination of more water in the landscape and West of the Meckering Line, rainfall is higher and greater water salinity has lead to a significant gradients increase slightly. Rivers are channelised amount of drainage on farmland to control both and, prior to clearing, many would have flowed ground and surface water [Ali and Coles, 2002]. seasonally but permanent water occurred in only a 1st National Salinity Engineering Conference 9–12 November 2004 Perth, Western Australia Broadscale drainage in dryland agricultural areas is invertebrates, 58 waterbird species and 21 frog unusual [Ali and Coles, 2002] but is occurring in species. The wheatbelt, along with the rest of the the wheatbelt because the region has an almost south-west, appears to be one of the most important unique level of secondary salinisation [NLWA, regions in Australia for radiation of invertebrates 2001]. Lack of comparable drainage elsewhere, with a drought-resistant life-stage [Halse et al., and a unique biota, mean studies from outside 2003]. Western Australia are of little help predicting the likely effect of drainage disposal water on aquatic biodiversity in the wheatbelt. Many of the aquatic 120 (a) systems, especially in the eastern wheatbelt, that are 100 s e t 80 a potential receiving bodies for drainage are naturally r eb 60 saline. While intuitively it may seem that drainage rt e v n 40 waters would have little adverse impact on saline I systems, evidence from studies of salinity tolerance 20 and habitat preference of many species suggest this 0 is not true [Halse et al., 2003]. 30 (b) This paper reviews what is known of the tolerance 25 ies ec 20 of wheatbelt wetland animals and plants to p s d 15 increased salinity and altered flood regimes, uses ir b r e this information to infer some ways in which both t 10 a W surface and deep drainage may be detrimental to 5 receiving bodies, and describes a possible system 0 for assessing biodiversity impacts of drainage. For the purposes of the paper, it is assumed drainage 80 (c) 70 will be directed into natural waterbodies, although s t 60 n a it may also be sent to evaporating basins, dams l 50 constructed for aquaculture or other disposal 40 nd p a l 30 options [George and Coleman, 2002]. The t e 20 potential, although poorly defined, indirect benefits W 10 of drainage to terrestrial and wetland biodiversity as 0 a result of reducing effects of salinisation in the 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 catchment as a whole [Ali and Coles, 2002; Hatton Conductivity uS cm-1 and Ruprecht, 2003] are not considered. Figure 1. Relationship between salinity and species In common with many biological studies, the term richness for (a) aquatic invertebrates, (b) waterbirds, fresh is used herein for water with salinity < 3 g L-1 and (c) wetland-associated plants [Cale et al., 2004; Total Dissolved Solids, subsaline for 3–10 g L-1 and Lyons et al., 2004; Pinder et al., 2004]. -1 saline for water > 10 g L . Occasionally salinity is Most invertebrate species occur in freshwater expressed in terms of electrical conductivity (1000 wetlands but about 15%, including Parartemia µS cm-1 ≈ 0.6 g L-1 until above 50 g L-1 when the -1 brine shrimps, many smaller species of crustaceans conversion factor begins to approximate 1 g L ). and many species of dipteran larvae, are more-or- Wetlands are defined in the Western Australian less restricted to naturally saline wetlands [Pinder et Wetlands Conservation Policy to include bodies of al., 2002]. Most of these naturally saline wetlands both still and flowing water, i.e. lakes, swamps, are playas, often associated with extensive braided pans, creeks and rivers. drainage lines covered in plants tolerant of salt and water-logging. About 60% of the wetland- 2 WETLAND VALUES associated flora of the wheatbelt occurs in, or Wheatbelt wetlands have considerable biological around, these naturally saline systems, which are value. In a global context, south-west Western particularly important for chenopods Australia has a rich and highly endemic flora (Salicornioideae), daisies (Asteraceae) and [Hopper et al., 1996] and a recent survey of strapweeds (Juncaginaceae) [Lyons et al., 2004]. wheatbelt wetlands recorded 986 wetland- The wheatbelt is a highly fragmented landscape and associated plant species [Halse et al., 2004]. The relatively few wetlands, even in nature reserves, are same survey recorded 957 species of aquatic in natural condition, free of significant weed 1st National Salinity Engineering Conference 9–12 November 2004 Perth, Western Australia invasion and hydrological change. As a result, all Prior to land clearing, few wheatbelt wetlands held undisturbed wetlands have important nature water for long periods and their aquatic conservation values. This applies as much to large invertebrates and plants have evolved with seasonal naturally saline playas as to small freshwater or episodic flood regimes. The distributions of wetlands, although faunal species richness is higher trees in, and around, wheatbelt wetlands show that at fresh wetlands. Melaleuca, Eucalyptus and Casuarina do not tolerate permanent inundation. Emergent sedges 3. SALINITY TOLERANCE exhibit similar a similar response [Halse et al., 2004]. Invertebrate species richness in wheatbelt wetlands starts declining at salinities > 4.1 g L-1 Many invertebrate groups with drought-resistant (6800 µS cm-1; Fig. 1). To some extent, loss of life-stages have higher species richness in seasonal freshwater species is offset by an increase in waterbodies than permanent ones. Halse [2002] number of halophilic ones and, in fact, richness of found all wetlands with high numbers of ostracod predominantly freshwater species begins declining species (9–12) were seasonal. More recently, Halse at salinities > 2.6 g L-1 [Pinder et al., 2004]. Most and McRae [2004] showed that five of the six waterbirds are more tolerant of salinity, which acts species of the giant ostracod Australocypris in as a constraint on species richness rather than a Western Australia appear to be restricted to determinant of it. Nevertheless, all but two seasonal, naturally saline wetlands experiencing wheatbelt wetlands surveyed in recent years with relatively little hydrological disturbance. ≥ 15 waterbird species had salinities ≤ 10 g L-1 (Fig. 1; see also [Halse et al., 1993b]). As with The information above, based on biological survey, invertebrates, some waterbirds are salt-lake suggests it is likely that changing the hydroperiod specialists: Banded Stilts Cladorhynchus of a wetland will alter its aquatic invertebrate fauna leucocephalus and Hooded Plovers Charadrius and its flora. Likely causes of change include rubicollis are obvious examples. altered cues for hatching and germination of spores and seeds, and altered time periods available for Most submerged or emergent aquatic plants (i.e. grazing animals and predators to establish those growing in the waterbody) are salt-sensitive, populations. In the case of naturally hypersaline although Ruppia persists until about 50 g L-1. playas, changes to the seasonal pattern of salinity as Riparian plant richness is independent of wetland a result of altered hydroperiod (Figure 2) may affect salinity in hydrologically undisturbed situations key triggers in plant and animal life-cycles.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages6 Page
-
File Size-