EE269 Signal Processing for Machine Learning Lecture 17

EE269 Signal Processing for Machine Learning Lecture 17

EE269 Signal Processing for Machine Learning Lecture 17 Instructor : Mert Pilanci Stanford University March 13, 2019 I Continuous Wavelet Transform 1 W (s, ⌧)= f(t) ⇤ dt = f(t), s,⌧ h s,⌧ i Z1 I Transforms a continuous function of one variable into a continuous function of two variables : translation and scale I For a compact representation, we can choose a mother wavelet (t) that matches the signal shape I Inverse Wavelet Transform 1 1 f(t)= W (s, ⌧) s,⌧ d⌧ds Z1 Z1 Continuous Wavelet Transform I Define a function (t) I Create scaled and shifted versions of (t) 1 t ⌧ = ( − ) s,⌧ ps s I Inverse Wavelet Transform 1 1 f(t)= W (s, ⌧) s,⌧ d⌧ds Z1 Z1 Continuous Wavelet Transform I Define a function (t) I Create scaled and shifted versions of (t) 1 t ⌧ = ( − ) s,⌧ ps s I Continuous Wavelet Transform 1 W (s, ⌧)= f(t) ⇤ dt = f(t), s,⌧ h s,⌧ i Z1 I Transforms a continuous function of one variable into a continuous function of two variables : translation and scale I For a compact representation, we can choose a mother wavelet (t) that matches the signal shape Continuous Wavelet Transform I Define a function (t) I Create scaled and shifted versions of (t) 1 t ⌧ = ( − ) s,⌧ ps s I Continuous Wavelet Transform 1 W (s, ⌧)= f(t) ⇤ dt = f(t), s,⌧ h s,⌧ i Z1 I Transforms a continuous function of one variable into a continuous function of two variables : translation and scale I For a compact representation, we can choose a mother wavelet (t) that matches the signal shape I Inverse Wavelet Transform 1 1 f(t)= W (s, ⌧) s,⌧ d⌧ds Z1 Z1 Wavelets Continuous Wavelet Transform Continuous Wavelet Transform Continuous Haar Wavelets I Consider the function 1 if 0 x 1 φ(x)= (0 otherwise I translates φ(x k) − Continuous Haar Wavelets I Consider the function 1 if 0 x 1 φ(x)= (0 otherwise I linear combination of the translates φ(x k) − Continuous Haar Wavelets I Consider the function 1 if 0 x 1 φ(x)= (0 otherwise I Define V0 = all square integrable functions of the form g(x)= a φ(x k) k − Xk =all square integrable functions which are constant on integer intervals Continuous Haar Wavelets I Consider the function 1 if 0 x 1 φ(x)= (0 otherwise I Define V1 = all square integrable functions of the form g(x)= a φ(2x k) k − Xk =all square integrable functions which are constant on half integer intervals Continuous Haar Wavelets I Consider the function 1 if 0 x 1 φ(x)= (0 otherwise I Define Vj = all square integrable functions of the form g(x)= a φ(2jx k) k − Xk =all square integrable functions which are constant on j 2− length intervals I In general Wj = Vj+1 Vj Continuous Haar Wavelets I Nested spaces: ...V 2 V 1 V0 V1 V2... − ⇢ − ⇢ ⇢ ⇢ I There is a subspace W0 such that V0 W0 = V1,i.e. ⊕ W := V V 0 1 0 Continuous Haar Wavelets I Nested spaces: ...V 2 V 1 V0 V1 V2... − ⇢ − ⇢ ⇢ ⇢ I There is a subspace W0 such that V0 W0 = V1,i.e. ⊕ W0 := V1 V0 I In general Wj = Vj+1 Vj Continuous Haar Wavelets I Nested spaces: ...V 2 V 1 V0 V1 V2... − ⇢ − ⇢ ⇢ ⇢ I Wj = Vj+1 Vj I Theorem: Every square integrable function can be uniquely expressed as 1 w where w W j j 2 j j= X1 I Each function can be written as f = j wj I f = j j ajk jk(x) (multiresolutionP analysis) P P Continuous Haar Wavelets I Nested spaces: ...V 2 V 1 V0 V1 V2... − ⇢ − ⇢ ⇢ ⇢ I Wj = Vj+1 Vj I Theorem: Every square integrable function can be uniquely expressed as 1 w where w W j j 2 j j= X1 1 if 0 x 1 I Define (x)= 2 ( 11/2 x 1 − j/2 j 1 I 2 (2 x k) forms an orthonormal basis for Wj − k= n o 1 I f = j j ajk jk(x) (multiresolution analysis) P P Continuous Haar Wavelets I Nested spaces: ...V 2 V 1 V0 V1 V2... − ⇢ − ⇢ ⇢ ⇢ I Wj = Vj+1 Vj I Theorem: Every square integrable function can be uniquely expressed as 1 w where w W j j 2 j j= X1 1 if 0 x 1 I Define (x)= 2 ( 11/2 x 1 − j/2 j 1 I 2 (2 x k) forms an orthonormal basis for Wj − k= n o 1 I Each function can be written as f = j wj P Continuous Haar Wavelets I Nested spaces: ...V 2 V 1 V0 V1 V2... − ⇢ − ⇢ ⇢ ⇢ I Wj = Vj+1 Vj I Theorem: Every square integrable function can be uniquely expressed as 1 w where w W j j 2 j j= X1 1 if 0 x 1 I Define (x)= 2 ( 11/2 x 1 − j/2 j 1 I 2 (2 x k) forms an orthonormal basis for Wj − k= n o 1 I Each function can be written as f = j wj I f = j j ajk jk(x) (multiresolutionP analysis) P P I pairwise averages: x2k 1 + x2k x = − ,k=1,...,N/2 k 2 I example x =[6, 12, 15, 15, 14, 12, 120, 116] s =[9, 15, 13, 118] ! Discrete Wavelet Transform t ⌧ I Discrete shifts and scales ( −s ) I Suppose we have a signal of length N x =[x1,x2,...xN ] I Consider a length N/2 approximation of x, e.g., for transmission I example x =[6, 12, 15, 15, 14, 12, 120, 116] s =[9, 15, 13, 118] ! Discrete Wavelet Transform t ⌧ I Discrete shifts and scales ( −s ) I Suppose we have a signal of length N x =[x1,x2,...xN ] I Consider a length N/2 approximation of x, e.g., for transmission I pairwise averages: x2k 1 + x2k x = − ,k=1,...,N/2 k 2 Discrete Wavelet Transform t ⌧ I Discrete shifts and scales ( −s ) I Suppose we have a signal of length N x =[x1,x2,...xN ] I Consider a length N/2 approximation of x, e.g., for transmission I pairwise averages: x2k 1 + x2k x = − ,k=1,...,N/2 k 2 I example x =[6, 12, 15, 15, 14, 12, 120, 116] s =[9, 15, 13, 118] ! I One step Haar Transformation x [s d] ! | I suppose that we are allowed to send N/2 more numbers I di↵erences x2k 1 x2k d = − − ,k=1,...,N/2 k 2 I we can recover x x =[6, 12, 15, 15, 14, 12, 120, 116] ! [s d]=[9, 15, 13, 118 3, 0, 1, 2] | | − − I suppose that we are allowed to send N/2 more numbers I di↵erences x2k 1 x2k d = − − ,k=1,...,N/2 k 2 I we can recover x x =[6, 12, 15, 15, 14, 12, 120, 116] ! [s d]=[9, 15, 13, 118 3, 0, 1, 2] | | − − I One step Haar Transformation x [s d] ! | One Step Haar Transformation Discrete Haar Transform Matrix I repeat the computation on the means I keep di↵erences in each step Discrete Haar Transform Filter Bank Discrete Haar Wavelet Transform Discrete Haar Wavelet Transform Discrete Haar Wavelet Transform Discrete Haar Wavelet Transform Wavelet Transform Features I mean, median I variance I zero crossing rate, mean crossing rate I entropy slide credit: A. Taspinar Results: training set: 7724 signals, test set: 2575 signals 3-Nearest Neighbors, `2-norm distance on x[n]. Accuracy : 0.77 3-Nearest Neighbors, ` -norm distance on X[k] . Accuracy : 0.85 2 | | Human Activity Recognition dataset I 3-Nearest Neighbors, `2-norm distance on x[n]. accuracy : 77% I 3-Nearest Neighbors, `2-norm distance on X[k] . | | accuracy : 85% I 1D Convolutional Net (4 layers) accuracy : 91% I Wavelet Transform Features (entropy, zero crossing, simple statistics) + linear classifier accuracy : 95% Other Wavelets Other Wavelets I In MATLAB [c,l] = wavedec(x,n,wname) returns the wavelet decomposition of the signal x at level n using the wavelet wname Other Discrete Wavelets What makes a good wavelet Application specific I Compact time support vs frequency support I Smoothness I Orthogonality 2D Discrete Haar Transform 2D Discrete Haar Transform I Continuous Frequency STFT L 1 − jλm X[n, λ]= x[n + m]w[m]e− , m=0 X Short-time Fourier Transform I window signal 0 m<0,m L e.g. w[m]= ≥ 10 m L 1 ⇢ − I Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) L 1 − j(2⇡/N)km X[n, k]= x[n + m]w[m]e− , 0 k N 1 . − m=0 X Short-time Fourier Transform I window signal 0 m<0,m L e.g. w[m]= ≥ 10 m L 1 ⇢ − I Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) L 1 − j(2⇡/N)km X[n, k]= x[n + m]w[m]e− , 0 k N 1 . − m=0 X I Continuous Frequency STFT L 1 − jλm X[n, λ]= x[n + m]w[m]e− , m=0 X I or, windowing the basis Short-time Fourier Transform L 1 − jλm X[n, λ]= x[n + m]w[m]e− , m=0 X I windowing basis signal Short-time Fourier Transform L 1 − jλm X[n, λ]= x[n + m]w[m]e− , m=0 X I windowing basis signal I or, windowing the basis Short-time Fourier Transform vs Wavelet Transform I wavelets have adaptive windows: I short windows for higher frequencies (small scale) I long windows for lower frequencies (large scale) Wavelet Transform vs STFT I Wavelet transform analyzes a signal at di↵erent frequencies with di↵erent resolutions: good time resolution and relatively poor frequency resolution at high frequencies good frequency resolution and relatively poor time resolution at low frequencies I Wavelet transform is better for signals with non-periodic and fast transient features (i.e., high frequency content for short duration) Wavelet Transform Wavelet Transform Wavelet Transform vs STFT Wavelet Transform vs STFT : Locality Wavelet Transform vs STFT : Locality Fourier vs Wavelet Transforms I Fourier Transform has convolution theorem and mathematical relationships I No closed form relations exist for wavelet transforms I Fourier transform has uniform spectral resolution I Wavelet transform has adaptive resolution Application: Audio Fingerprinting I Spectrogram is reduced to prominent time-frequency locations I Constellations are robust against noise and outliers.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    52 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us