2018 Educator Preparation Report Card

2018 Educator Preparation Report Card

2018 EDUCATOR PREPARATION REPORT CARD ABOUT THIS REPORT PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES The Educator Preparation Report Card presents data on the State Board’s key priority areas for preparing educators for Tennessee: recruiting strong, diverse candidates to teach in the areas of greatest need; employment in Tennessee public schools; strong teaching 100% - 80.1% performance; and effectively supporting our students’ learning. 80.0% - 60.1% In 2007, the Tennessee General Assembly passed legislation requiring the publication of a report on key metrics of educator preparation providers throughout the state. Several aspects of the report card are required by that legislation, including indicators on: placement 60.0% - 40.1% and retention rates, scores on licensure exams, and teacher effect data based on Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) scores. The report card also includes other key 40.0% - 0.0% priority areas for the State Board. This information can help providers make program improvements and provide the public with information on important aspects of educator preparation in the state. A summary of results is provided in this state level report, and individual provider reports can be found here: http://teacherprepreportcard.tn.gov/. DOMAIN SUMMARY Candidate Profile The Candidate Profile domain evaluates the provider’s ability to recruit a strong, diverse cohort of 3 SCORED METRICS 20 POINTS AVAILABLE candidates and prepare them to teach in the content areas of greatest need. Employment The Employment domain evaluates a provider’s performance in preparing educators to begin and 2 SCORED METRICS 15 POINTS AVAILABLE remain teaching in Tennessee public schools. Provider Impact The Provider Impact domain reports on the effectiveness of a provider’s completers in 4 SCORED METRICS 40 POINTS AVAILABLE Tennessee public school classrooms. STATE COMPLETER CHARACTERISTICS Teachers in Three-Year Cohort Enrollment by Ethnicity 1 6,000 American Indian 3,674 0.2% 3,340 3,312 or Alaskan Native 2 3,000 Asian 1.4% 9 Black 9.3% 0 70+ 3 2015 2016 2017 Hispanic/Latino 2.6% 1 Native Hawaiian or State of Residency for Cohort Members 0.1% Other Pacific Islander 85 Tennessee White 85.0% 2 86.3% Two more 1.5% Out-of-State More Races 10086+14 13.7% Initial License Type for Cohort Members Clinical Practice Type for Cohort Members Baccalaureate Student Teaching 52.3% 62.6% Post-Baccalaureate Internship 47.7% 10.2% Job Embedded 10052+48 10063+10+27 27.2% Percent of Admissions Based on*: 2 SAT 2.1% 22 ACT 22.1% 11 Praxis/CORE 10.8% 1 GRE 0.1% 1 Miller Analogies 0.1% * Providers often consider multiple assessments in the admission process; some candidates were admitted using a former version of the Praxis assessment. 2018 EDUCATOR PREPARATION REPORT CARD PAGE 2 LARGEST PRODUCERS OF COMPLETERS WITH HIGH DEMAND ENDORSEMENTS ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE Number of Endorsements SECONDARY MATH Number of Endorsements Lipscomb University 174 University of Tennessee - Knoxville 42 Teach for America - Memphis 46 Lipscomb University 35 Teach for America - Nashville 46 Tennessee Technological University 33 Vanderbilt University 37 Union University 31 TNTP Nashville Teaching Fellows 36 Teach for America - Memphis 29 SECONDARY SCIENCE SPANISH Middle Tennessee State University 46 Teach for America - Memphis 23 Lipscomb University 44 Lipscomb University 20 Teach for America - Memphis 42 Union University 20 Tennessee Technological University 40 Middle Tennessee State University 19 Union University 38 University of Tennessee - Knoxville 17 SPECIAL EDUCATION University of Memphis 181 Middle Tennessee State University 82 Lipscomb University 80 Vanderbilt University 65 University of Tennessee - Knoxville 64 2018 EDUCATOR PREPARATION REPORT CARD PAGE 3 OVERALL PERCENTAGE OF PROVIDERS PER PERFORMANCE CATEGORY In 2018, 38 providers received a scored report card. Eight providers achieved a score that placed them in Category 4, the top performance category. Eighteen providers placed in Category 3, while eight providers achieved scores that corresponded to Category 2 performance. Four providers placed in Category 1. PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 CATEGORY 3 CATEGORY 4 2018 47.3% 50% 21.1% 21.1% 25% 10.5% PERCENT OF INSTITUTIONS PERCENT 0% 2017 50% 39.4% 33.3% 21.2% 25% 6.1% PERCENT OF INSTITUTIONS PERCENT 0% 2016 50% 36.7% 26.7% 23.3% 25% 13.3% PERCENT OF INSTITUTIONS PERCENT 0% OVERALL COUNT OF PROVIDERS BY PERCENT OF POINTS EARNED 2018 11 10 7 6 5 3 3 5 2 1 COUNT OF INSTITUTIONS COUNT 0 020170 10 7 7 6 6 4 5 1 1 1 COUNT OF INSTITUTIONS COUNT 0 020160 10 7 6 5 5 5 3 3 1 COUNT OF INSTITUTIONS COUNT 0 00% 010% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 090% 100% PERCENT OF POINTS EARNED 2018 EDUCATOR PREPARATION REPORT CARD PAGE 4 STATE SUMMARY RESULTS OVERALL CANDIDATE TN PROVIDER NAME PROVIDER IMPACT PERFORMANCE PROFILE EMPLOYMENT CATEGORY Aquinas College Teachers in three-year cohort: 53 Austin Peay State University Teachers in three-year cohort: 515 Belmont University Teachers in three-year cohort: 144 Bryan College Teachers in three-year cohort: 66 Carson-Newman University Teachers in three-year cohort: 249 Christian Brothers University Teachers in three-year cohort: 88 Cumberland University Teachers in three-year cohort: 119 East Tennessee State University Teachers in three-year cohort: 530 Freed-Hardeman University Teachers in three-year cohort: 258 Johnson University Teachers in three-year cohort: 92 King University Teachers in three-year cohort: 90 Lee University Teachers in three-year cohort: 421 LeMoyne-Owen College Teachers in three-year cohort: 32 2018 EDUCATOR PREPARATION REPORT CARD PAGE 5 OVERALL CANDIDATE TN PROVIDER NAME PROVIDER IMPACT PERFORMANCE PROFILE EMPLOYMENT CATEGORY Lincoln Memorial University Teachers in three-year cohort: 175 Lipscomb University Teachers in three-year cohort: 672 Martin Methodist College Teachers in three-year cohort: 37 Maryville College Teachers in three-year cohort: 66 Memphis College of Art Teachers in three-year cohort: 34 Memphis Teacher Residency Teachers in three-year cohort: 161 Middle Tennessee State University Teachers in three-year cohort: 955 Milligan College Teachers in three-year cohort: 94 Nashville Teacher Residency Teachers in three-year cohort: 11 South College Teachers in three-year cohort: 43 Southern Adventist University Teachers in three-year cohort: 90 Teach for America - Memphis Teachers in three-year cohort: 401 Teach for America - Nashville Teachers in three-year cohort: 239 Tennessee State University Teachers in three-year cohort: 144 2018 EDUCATOR PREPARATION REPORT CARD PAGE 6 OVERALL CANDIDATE TN PROVIDER NAME PROVIDER IMPACT PERFORMANCE PROFILE EMPLOYMENT CATEGORY Tennessee Technological University Teachers in three-year cohort: 930 Tennessee Wesleyan University Teachers in three-year cohort: 57 TNTP Nashville Teaching Fellows Teachers in three-year cohort: 129 Trevecca Nazarene University Teachers in three-year cohort: 134 Tusculum University Teachers in three-year cohort: 253 Union University Teachers in three-year cohort: 495 University of Memphis Teachers in three-year cohort: 472 University of Tennessee - Chattanooga Teachers in three-year cohort: 484 University of Tennessee - Knoxville Teachers in three-year cohort: 581 University of Tennessee - Martin Teachers in three-year cohort: 555 Vanderbilt University Teachers in three-year cohort: 298 Welch College Teachers in three-year cohort: 26 Western Governors University Teachers in three-year cohort: 130 2018 EDUCATOR PREPARATION REPORT CARD PAGE 7 .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us