COSO STYLE PICTOGRAPHS 95 Kroeber, A. L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of Califomia. "Coso" Style Pictographs of Washington: Smithsonian Institution, the Southern Sierra Nevada Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. ALAN PHILIP GARFINKEL Reid, Hugo Two recently discovered pictograph sites 1968 The Indians of Los Angeles County. have similarities indicating common origin to Robert Heizer, ed. Southwest Museum the "Coso" style petroglyphs identified by Paper No. 21. Grant, Baird and Pringle (1968). These sites Rust, Horatio N. were located during field reconnaissance in the 1906 A Puberty Ceremony of the Mission Southern Sierra Nevada. The two sites appear Indians. American Anthropologist 8:28- unique for two reasons: (1) they date to the late 32. prehistoric and historic periods which pre­ Sparkman, Philip S. viously have not been noted as containing 1908 The Culture of the Luiseno Indians. "Coso" style rock art; and (2) "Coso" style University of Califomia Publications in pictographs are exceedingly rare and are un­ American Archaeology and Ethnology known for these periods. 8:187-234. Grant, Baird, and Pringle (1968) defined a Strong, WiUiam Duncan pecuhar petroglyph style found within the 1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern Cali­ Coso Range located in the westem Mojave fornia. University of Califomia PubUca­ Desert. Petroglyphs are found on patinated tions in American Archaeology and basaltic clhfs and boulders and display a Etbnology 26. (Reprinted 1972, Malki wealth of representational zoomorphic and Museum Press, Banning.) anthropomorphic forms. The most recurrent zoomorphic form and that which has come to Winterboume, John W. characterize this locality is the full front-facing 1935 Reports on Limestone Canyon Excava­ tions, Historical Research Project, 31 horned and boat-shaped bodied bighorn F2-96. State Relief Emergency Admin­ sheep. istration. Grant, Baird, and Pringle (1968:18) say of this pattern: Winterboume, John W. 1937 Santiago Canyon Site Daily Field Notes This method of drawing the homs (often and Accession List, Project 4465. Federal with ears added) is probably the most Works Progress Administration. characteristic feature of the Coso sheep. Both these features are extremely rare in other parts of the west. A few isolated examples in Texas may be laid to inde­ pendent invention, but a single example in Nevada east of the Sierra Nevada and numbers of hom-front sheep from the middle Columbia near Vantage suggest a northern extension of Coso ideas. Pictographs in the Coso style are rare and none seem to be attributable to the late period. Grant and his associates state that In the Coso Range, there are six sites where 96 THE JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA ANTHROPOLOGY some designs are painted, and the style indicates that they are late and done by another group of people [emphasis added]. Most if not all the late period pictograph sites in the Coso Range are abstract and bear no resemblance to the earlier period petro­ glyphs. Furthermore, the only "Coso" style pictograph with zoomorphic representations appears very old (Campbell Grant, personal communication). The two pictograph sites to be described here contain elements which appear similar to those found on petroglyphs in the Coso Range. Both sites appear to date to the historic period based on the representation of "Europeans" on horseback. The second site is located adjacent to a smaU open campsite containing pottery, which is suggested to further date the site to the late prehistoric or historic periods. The first site (CA-Ker-735) is located north of Walker Pass in Indian WeUs Canyon (Figs. Fig. 1. Locations of sites with Coso style petroglyphs in 1, 2). Above the drainage, on a large granite the Sierra Nevada. Fig. 2. Indian Wells Canyon in the Western Mojave Desert. coso STYLE PICTOGRAPHS 97 Fig. 3 "European" anthropomorph and horse at pictograph site in Indian Wells Canyon (CA-Ker-735). boulder rockshelter facing eastward, is a large passed the mouth of Indian Wells Canyon in polychrome panel consisting of approximately 1835. 50 different elements. Some of these elements The paintings appear so fresh that the are superimposed on earlier ones which are actual pigment looks as though it was smeared mostly painted in black and red pigment. The on and has not been absorbed into the rock. ceihng of the shelter is fire-blackened. No Many of the other pictograph sites in the artifactual remains were noted in the vicinity of region appear older, with no actual pigment the site, although a boulder containing seven evident but only the stained rock manifesting bedrock mortars or "cupules" is found in front the designs. The question immediately arose as of the shelter. to whether the site could be a forgery or The panel is approximately 2 m. in width manufactured even later in time than pre­ and 1 m. in height. Most significant is the viously suggested. In an attempt to resolve this depiction of men wearing hats and riding on question a scraping of the white pigment was horses (Figs. 3 and 4), thus dating the site to collected and analyzed using quantitative the period of European contact in the area. X-ray fluorescence. These elements would appear to date to a time Through conversations with paint special­ around the 1860's when gold and silver mining ists, it was discerned that white pigment would interests attracted Whites to the region; but be amenable to analysis in this way and that it they could also document earlier events, such would be possible to tell, first, whether the as the Bonneville trapping expedition which paint is of commercial or native origin, and 98 THE JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA ANTHROPOLOGY Fig. 4. Pictograph panel at CA-Ker-735. Flower-like form measures 52 centimeters in diameter. second, if the paint was commercial, whether it authentic, analysis of the stylistic elements was was purchased prior to the 1930's. White paint undertaken. Fifty different elements are dis­ manufactured in the late 1800's and early tinguishable in the pictograph panel. Seven of 1900's was lead-based. Lead was replaced in the 1930's by titanium as the base for the white Table 1 pigment, and this latter substance is stiU in use today. ELEMENTAL CONSTITUENTS OF WHITE The analysis revealed the elements enumer­ PIGMENT FROM INDIAN WELLS CAN­ ated in Table 1. Error factors for major YON PICTOGRAPH (CA-Ker-735)* constituent elements through this type of anal­ Element Total Percent ysis run as high as 15% per element, so care was Tl 0.6 taken to obtain a more precise measure of lead K. 11.0 Ca 0.8 and titanium. No lead was revealed in the Fe 0.8 sample but a trace (0.62%) of titanium was present. This percentage is much too smaU to Maior Constituents Percentage Estimates H2K.Al3(SiO^)3 ~96 have come from commerical paint where tita­ (muscovite mica) nium is a major constituent, amounting to 10% CaS04 2.7 or more by weight. TiO, 1.0 Since the pigment used apparently was not •Analysis conducted by Trace Analysis Laboratory, Hayward, commercial paint, and the she apparently is California. coso STYLE PICTOGRAPHS 99 Fig. 5. Close-up of Coso style bighorn sheep at pictograph site CA-Ker-735. \:l'^ r?r. Fig. 6. Qose-up of Mountain lion (?) or dog form at pictograph site CA-Ker-735. 100 THE JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA ANTHROPOLOGY these are definitely bighorn sheep. Six are ular basalt transported from the desert floor to shown with full front-facing horns and one has the east. side-facing horns. They are all rendered in The pictograph panel is badly faded but white pigment. These sheep bear striking re­ contains two clearly distinguishable bighorn semblances to elements found in the Coso sheep in red pigment with full front-facing Range (compare Figs. 4 and 5 with Grant, horns and boat-shaped body. Also depicted is Baird, and Pringle 1968:27, 61, 75, and Heizer a man on horseback. This site would seem to and Clewlow 1973: Pis. 11 and 18). date to the historic period, based on the Another large zoomorph (Fig. 6) may be presence of the horse and rider motif and its interpreted as a dog, coyote, or mountain hon. assumed contemporaneity with the adjacent The resemblance to Coso style elements is archaeological locus. This would be the first again quite noticeable. Grant and his asso­ documented occurrence of a Coso style picto­ ciates have suggested that this zoomorph is a graph outside of the desert area of the western dog, as it is sometimes shown attacking moun­ Mojave. tain sheep in petroglyph panels found in the Both these sites appear intriguing and Coso Range. Almost identical petroglyphs are suggest a late reappearance of interest in hlustrated in the report on the Coso rock art ceremonialism in the form of paintings, per­ (Grant, Baird, and Pringle 1968:22). Heizer haps "copying" earlier petroglyph forms found and Clewlow (1973:Figs. 60/ and 61c) depict in the Coso Range. The Coso Range was the other Coso glyphs illustrating this same territory of the ethnographicahy described element. Lhtle Lake Shoshoni (Steward 1938:80-84). Other elements in the panel include at least Since the Shoshoni and neighboring groups three recognizable horse and rider motifs all denied any knowledge of the purpose or the painted in white pigment. Other elements production of rock art, it is ihuminating to include anthropomorphs, sunbursts, chains, learn that the actual practice continued to "shields," other abstract elements, and a very some extent into historic times. During his­ notable "flower form." This large flower form toric times, the Little Lake Shoshoni moved (Fig. 4) is painted in orange and white. The far south of their original territorial bound­ only other large element in orange pigment is a aries and most Ukely utiUzed the productive fading shield-like pattern.