Constitutional Court of Turkey

Constitutional Court of Turkey

Constitutional Court of Turkey Constitutional Court of Turkey www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr 3 THE PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE First of all, I would like to extend my heartfelt greetings to all readers of this booklet and express my thanks for their genuine interest in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey. This booklet pro- vides brief information on the general structure, the jurisdiction and proceedings as well as the physical properties of the Constitutional Court. The Turkish Constitutional Court, being one of the oldest constitu- tionality review organs established in Europe, has accumulated a sizeable amount of experience in its history of more than fifty years. You will find reflections of the development of constitutional justice in our country and the Court’s transformation process up to present in this booklet. Prof. Dr. Zühtü Arslan The basic function of the Constitutional Court of Turkey can be sum- President marized as safeguarding and promoting democracy, rule of law and the fundamental rights and freedoms. In performing this crucial function, the Court has learned a lot from its past experiences and continuously developed its jurisprudence to better address the needs of the time. I am more than happy to express that Turkish Constitutional Court has shown a significant progress to achieve a paradigm shift and adopted a “rights-based paradigm” in the recent years. Our Court strives to establish con- stitutional and individual justice through constitutionality review and individual application. Consequently, the Constitutional Court has become the bulwark of fundamental rights and freedoms to a considerable extent. This paradigm shift can be tracked down especially in our judgments concerning individual applications. In these judgments, the Constitutional Court adopted an approach which broadens the scope of protection and enhances the standards for fundamental rights and freedoms. These judgments also increase the prestige of the Court in international arena by providing us the opportunity to contribute to corpus of universal law. We are more than willing to share our knowledge and experience with our counterparts in other countries and improve the Court by learning from theirs. We firmly believe that a strong cooperation among the organs of con- stitutional justice all around the world will make significant contribution to realizing our common ideal of a fair and peaceful world. Therefore, we welcome all requests and proposals to establish means of communication and cooperation with other constitutional courts and equivalent institutions. If our guests would like to learn more about the Constitu- tional Court of Turkey, they may visit our website at www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr or request specific informa- tion from our relevant departments. Constitutional Court of Turkey 4 www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr CONTENTS 1. THE HISTORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN TURKEY 8 Before the 1961 Constitution The 1961 Constitution The 1982 Constitution 2. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE COURT 12 The Constitutional Court The President of the Constitutional Court Justices Rapporteur-Judges General Secretariat 3. THE ADJUDICATION PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT 18 4. THE DECISION MAKING BODIES OF THE COURT 19 Plenary of the Constitutional Court Sections of the Constitutional Court Commissions of the Constitutional Court Constitutional Court of Turkey www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr 5 5. THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 21 Constitutional Review of Norms Action for Annulment (Abstract Review of Norms) Contention of Unconstitutionality (Concrete Review of Norms) Individual Application (Constitutional Complaint) Dissolution of Political Parties Financial Audit of Political Parties Trial of Statesmen before the Supreme Criminal Court 6. NATURE & EFFECTS OF THE COURT’S JUDGMENTS 26 7. THE COURT BUILDING 28 8. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 36 Cooperation with International Organizations World Conference on Constitutional Justice The Conference of European Constitutional Courts Association of Asian Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Institutions Cooperation with National Constitutional Courts 9. CURRENT & FORMER JUSTICES 40 Constitutional Court of Turkey 6 www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr Constitutional Court of Turkey www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr 7 Constitutional Court of Turkey 8 www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr THE HISTORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL 1. REVIEW IN TURKEY “No provision of the Constitution can, under any pretext whatsoever, be suspended or neglected.” Kanun-u Esasi of 1876 (The First Constitution of Ottoman Empire), Article 115 Constitutional Court of Turkey www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr 9 BEFORE THE 1961 CONSTITUTION panied by its observations, to the Chamber of Deputies, demanding that it should be amended or modified in the Considering the fact that the European model of con- sense of those observations.” stitutional adjudication developed after the World War II, it is not surprising that the earliest versions of The 1921 Constitution contained no provision relating Turkish Constitutions such as Kanun-u Esasi (Ottoman to the constitutional adjudication. Later on, the 1924 Basic Law), the first written Constitution of Turkish Constitution adopted the supremacy of the constitu- history dated 1876, and 1921 and 1924 Constitutions tion and explicitly prescribed that laws cannot be con- did not have provisions establishing a constitutional trary to the Constitution by stating in Article 103 “None review mechanism. of the provisions of this Constitution may be arbitrarily However, there are some provisions which bear hints modified on any pretext; neither may the enforcement of constitutionality review as early as in Kanun-u Es- of any provision be suspended. No law shall be in con- asi of 1876. For instance, Article 115 of Kanun-u Esasi tradiction to the Constitution.” However, the 1924 Con- adopts the principle of the supremacy of constitution stitution introduced no mechanism carrying out the by stating “No provision of the Constitution can, under constitutionality review of the norms. any pretext whatsoever, be suspended or neglected.” Similarly, Article 64 prescribes not a legal but a po- THE 1961 CONSTITUTION litical review of constitutionality by stating “The Sen- The Turkish Constitutional Court was first established ate examines the Bills or Budget transmitted to it by the by the 1961 Constitution. In that period, only a few Chamber of Deputies. If in the course of the examination countries in Europe (Austria, Germany and Italy) had of a Bill the Senate finds a provision contrary to the sov- a constitutional adjudication mechanism. Therefore, ereign rights of the Sultan, to liberty, the Constitution, Turkish Constitutional Court is one of the oldest con- the territorial integrity of the Empire, the internal se- stitutional courts established in Europe. curity of the country, to the interests of the defence of the country, or to morality, it rejects it definitely by a Article 8 of the 1961 Constitution adopted the suprem- vote, assigning its reasons; or it sends it back, accom- acy and the binding force of the Constitution by stating Constitutional Court of Turkey 10 www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr “Laws shall not be in conflict with the Constitution. The No. 44 on Establishment and Rules of Procedures of provisions of the Constitution shall be fundamental legal the Constitutional Court (dated 22.4.1962) principles binding the legislative, executive and judicial organs, administrative authorities and individuals” The THE 1982 CONSTITUTION Constitution also established a Constitutional Court to The system of constitutional review established by carry out the constitutional review of laws under Ar- the 1961 Constitution was preserved in the 1982 Con- ticle 145 and subsequent articles of the Constitution. stitution with a few changes. Articles 146-153 of the As stated above, Turkey is one of the first countries Constitution lay down in detail the composition, duties, to adopt the constitutional adjudication, which is con- working methods of the Constitutional Court and other sidered to be the most important and ultimate level in issues concerning constitutional review. The Consti- the development of the rule of law. The Court started tutional Court carried out its duties until 2011 accord- operating in 1962 following the enactment of the Law ing to the Law No. 2949 (dated 10.11.1983). Constitutional Court of Turkey www.constitutionalcourt.gov.tr 11 The First Justices of the Constitutional Court Since the composition, powers and structure of the procedure of the Constitutional Court are established Court were changed considerably by the constitutional by the Rules of Procedure of the Court. amendments in 2010, a new law was enacted in 2011. The introduction of individual application mechanism The new Law on Establishment and Rules of Proce- through the constitutional amendments in 2010 pro- dures of the Constitutional Court (No. 6216, 30.3.2011), vided for an effective means to ensure better protec- spelling out the provisions of the Constitution, stip- tion of the fundamental rights and freedoms of indi- ulates its organization, independence, proceedings, viduals. With the amendments made to that end, the disciplinary infractions and disciplinary proceedings. citizens are entitled the right to individual application, The Law No. 6216 vested in the Plenary of the Court and Constitutional Court is assigned the duty to exam- the authority to regulate its rules of procedure. There- ine and rule on such applications for the protection of fore,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    44 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us