Geographic Differences in Effects of Experimental Warming on Ant Species Diversity and Community Composition 1, 2,6 2 3,7 4 3,8 S

Geographic Differences in Effects of Experimental Warming on Ant Species Diversity and Community Composition 1, 2,6 2 3,7 4 3,8 S

Geographic differences in effects of experimental warming on ant species diversity and community composition 1, 2,6 2 3,7 4 3,8 S. L. PELINI, S. E. DIAMOND, L. M. NICHOLS, K. L. STUBLE, A. M. ELLISON, N. J. SANDERS, 2 5 R. R. DUNN, AND N. J. GOTELLI 1Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403 USA 2Department of Biological Sciences and Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695 USA 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USA 4Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366 USA 5Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405 USA Citation: Pelini, S. L., S. E. Diamond, L. M. Nichols, K. L. Stuble, A. M. Ellison, N. J. Sanders, R. R. Dunn, and N. J. Gotelli. 2014. Geographic differences in effects of experimental warming on ant species diversity and community composition. Ecosphere 5(10):125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00143.1 Abstract. Ecological communities are being reshaped by climatic change. Losses and gains of species will alter community composition and diversity but these effects are likely to vary geographically and may be hard to predict from uncontrolled ‘‘natural experiments’’. In this study, we used open-top warming chambers to simulate a range of warming scenarios for ground-nesting ant communities at a northern (Harvard Forest, MA) and southern (Duke Forest, NC) study site in the eastern US. After 2.5 years of experimental warming, we found no significant effects of accumulated growing degree days or soil moisture on ant diversity or community composition at the northern site, but a decrease in asymptotic species richness and changes in community composition at the southern site. However, fewer than 10% of the species at either site responded significantly to the warming treatments. Our results contrast with those of a comparable natural experiment conducted along a nearby elevational gradient, in which species richness and composition responded strongly to changes in temperature and other correlated variables. Together, our findings provide some support for the prediction that warming will have a larger negative effect on ecological communities in warmer locales at lower latitudes and suggest that predicted responses to warming may differ between controlled field experiments and unmanipulated thermal gradients. Key words: ants; climate change; community; elevational gradient; Formicidae; geographic range; warming experiment. Received 6 May 2014; revised 12 July 2014; accepted 15 July 2014; final version received 4 September 2014; published 21 October 2014. Corresponding Editor: D. P. C. Peters. Copyright: Ó 2014 Pelini et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ 6 Present address: Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 USA. 7 Present address: Oklahoma Biological Survey, Norman, Oklahoma 73019 USA. 8 Present address: Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100 Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION climatic change depend both on environmental conditions at specific geographic locations and The responses of ecological communities to on the composition of and interactions between v www.esajournals.org 1 October 2014 v Volume 5(10) v Article 125 PELINI ET AL. co-occurring species (Tylianakis et al. 2008, Gil- ments (Wolkovich et al. 2012). man et al. 2010, Singer and Parmesan 2010, Pelini In this study, we examined community-level et al. 2012). Populations and species occupying responses of forest ants to ongoing experimental different locations may vary in their tolerances warming in open-top chambers at a northern for abiotic changes (Deutsch et al. 2008, Tewks- (Harvard Forest, Massachusetts) and a southern bury et al. 2008, Huey et al. 2009, Andrew et al. (Duke Forest, North Carolina) site in the eastern 2013, Kingsolver et al. 2013). Additionally, the USA. These two sites represent the northern and indirect effects of climate change mediated by southern boundaries of eastern US forests: species interactions can strengthen or reverse the Harvard Forest lies at the northern end of the effects of abiotic change (Suttle et al. 2007, Eastern Temperate Forests (Mixed Wood Plains) Rouifed et al. 2010, Pelini et al. 2011a). As a and the southern edge of the Northern Forests consequence, it is difficult to predict how climatic (Atlantic Highlands), whereas Duke Forest, change will shape the composition and diversity within the Eastern Temperate Forests, is at the of local communities at small spatial scales. boundary between the Southeastern USA Plains However, at coarser grains of observation, and the Mississippi Alluvial and Southeast such as latitudinal and elevational gradients, Coastal Plains (CEC 1997). Previous work in this climatic differences may lead to predictable shifts system has demonstrated strong geographic in composition and diversity. In the simplest differences in the responses of individual species scenario, the poleward expansion of species to experimental warming: at the warmer south- geographic ranges may lead to an increase in ern site, ant species with higher thermal toler- diversity at higher latitudes, even though some ances had higher worker densities and greater species may disappear locally because they foraging activity in warmer chambers than did cannot tolerate warmer conditions. Net gains in ants species with lower thermal tolerances species richness may arise because warming is (Diamond et al. 2012a, Stuble et al. 2013). At unlikely to push many species above their the cooler northern site, however, worker density thermal limits (Addo-Bediako et al. 2000, of all species, regardless of their thermal toler- Deutsch et al. 2008, Tewksbury et al. 2008, ances, was highest in the warmer chambers. Kingsolver et al. 2013). Conversely, at lower Similar responses have been observed in the soil latitudes, sites should be more likely to lose microbial community, with larger shifts in both species with increases in temperature because structure and function observed at the southern some species will exceed their critical thermal site (Cregger et al. 2014). limits (Addo-Bediako et al. 2000, Deutsch et al. Based on these previous findings, we predicted 2008, Tewksbury et al. 2008, Kingsolver et al. that community composition and diversity 2013) or experience too few days and hours would respond differently to warming at the within their range of optimal foraging tempera- northern and southern sites. Specifically, because tures. most northern species rarely experience temper- Experiments that compare the effects of warm- atures near their upper thermal limits, their ing on communities near high- and low latitudi- performance and abundance should not be nal range boundaries can test predictions about depressed by warming (Diamond et al. 2012a). geographic patterns of warming effects on If other ant species from warmer microhabitats ecological communities. All other things being such as forest gaps are able to colonize the equal, ‘‘natural experiments’’ along elevational chambers, ant community composition would and latitudinal climate gradients can also predict change and diversity would increase in the which species can and will persist in particular warmer chambers at Harvard Forest. In contrast, climates (Ibanez et al. 2013). Differences in the at Duke Forest we predicted that ant diversity response of species to natural thermal gradients would decrease and community composition and to controlled warming experiments might would change because many resident species reflect dispersal limitation, historical effects, experience temperatures that exceed their ther- confounded gradients in natural experiments mal tolerances. Within sites, we expected closely (Gotelli and Ellison 2012), or small-scale artifacts related species to respond to warming in similar or design constraints in controlled field experi- ways due to shared evolutionary histories (Dia- v www.esajournals.org 2 October 2014 v Volume 5(10) v Article 125 PELINI ET AL. mond et al. 2012b). cm above the ground so that movement of ants Because both experiments and large-scale and other arthropods into and out of the geographic patterns of diversity and species chambers is not restricted. These chambers have composition are used to forecast future responses been operating continuously since January 2010. to climatic change (Parry and IPCC 2007), Four permanent pitfall traps (5 cm diameter) are assessing congruence between responses to ex- located in each chamber. Each month, pitfall perimental warming and natural warming is traps were opened and filled with 60–80 mL of important. We compared the patterns in diversity 95% EtOH or glycol and left uncovered for 48 and composition of ants under experimental hours during rain-free conditions. Ants were warming with those along an elevational gradi- then extracted and identified to species using ent in the Great Smoky Mountains. The eleva- regional keys (e.g., Ellison et al. 2012); identifica- tional gradient shares many species with and tions were confirmed at the Harvard University spans a gradient of temperature

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us