Social Media and Repressive Regimes: The Case of Cuba and Venezuela Michaelanne Dye Eric Gilbert say via social media. While much work has been conducted in other parts of the world, we know little Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology about the mechanisms and effects of state-sponsored 85 5th St. 85 5th St. social media control in Latin America. In this work, we Atlanta, GA 30332 USA Atlanta, GA 30332 USA seek to address the technical, conceptual, and [email protected] [email protected] operational challenges that social media presents by conducting a mixed-methods study of social media in Annie Antón Amy Bruckman two countries governed by repressive regimes: Cuba Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology and Venezuela. th 85 5 St. 85 5th St. Author Keywords Atlanta, GA 30332 USA Atlanta, GA 30332 USA Social media; censorship; Latin America; Cuba; [email protected] [email protected] Venezuela. Abstract Social media played a significant role in shaping the ACM Classification Keywords recent revolutionary wave of demonstrations and riots H5.3. Group and Organization Interfaces; that ultimately led to rulers being forced out of power in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and Yemen. However, in other Asynchronous Interaction; Web-based interaction. parts of the world, repressive regimes use technical and non-technical methods to suppress what their citizens Introduction Traditional narratives paint a picture of the Paste the appropriate copyright/license statement here. ACM now democratizing nature of social media, however, in supports three different publication options: certain parts of the world, repressive regimes use • ACM copyright: ACM holds the copyright on the work. This is the historical approach. technical and non-technical methods to suppress what • License: The author(s) retain copyright, but ACM receives an their citizens say via social media. By examining social exclusive publication license. media activity in Cuba and Venezuela, we seek to • Open Access: The author(s) wish to pay for the work to be open understand what persuasive power social media has in access. The additional fee must be paid to ACM. This text field is large enough to hold the appropriate release statement these countries, and what power the state has to assuming it is single-spaced in Verdana 7 point font. Please do not control it. change the size of this text box. Every submission will be assigned their own unique DOI string to be included here. dramatic change appears to be possible, making this Research Questions research timely. Specifically, we are seeking to determine whether: (a) machine learning techniques can predict which Venezuela individuals sharing content online are likely simply The situation in Venezuela has interesting similarities recycling government positions, and which are and differences to Cuba (see Table 1). Recent political individual citizens acting independently; and (b) and economic changes in Venezuela have put the whether it is possible to infer patterns of influence and country in a state of unrest causing an outcry of changes in public opinion within a stream of content citizens, particularly via social media. The Venezuelan from independent citizens. To answer these questions, government has increased its surveillance and we are using a combination of machine learning censorship online in response to the growing usage of algorithms, geographic inference, paraphrase detection social media by the Venezuelan people especially those and social network analysis—all informed and validated that seek to oppose the current ruling party [5]. The by qualitative interviews with citizens on the ground. In government has been known to use various tactics to addition to illuminating the complex nature of censor opposing information, including site blocking information propagation in repressive regimes, this and service disruptions especially during times of research has broader implications for the role of online heightened political sensitivity (e.g. elections). Further, social networks as tools of persuasion and intelligence the government has begun to persecute individuals gathering in a global setting. (particularly bloggers) who utilize social media to speak out against the government. In addition to silencing those who try to speak out against the government, the Background ruling party is also utilizing social media outlets as tools Cuba to control popular opinion through cyber attacks on Cuba has been called the second most isolated country media outlets, hijackings of Twitter profiles of political in the world, particularly due to its tightly controlled activists, and an increased use of anonymous Twitter Internet [8]. Reasons for this Internet stagnation accounts that support the government [6]. include lack of resources, the US embargo against Cuba, and the Cuban government’s fear of the implications of the freedom of information [3, 4]. Cuba Venezuela However, changes during the last five years have placed Cuba in the midst of a technological upheaval, 15% Internet penetration 44% Internet penetration pitting government control against the desire for economic success [4]. More Cubans are accessing the Obstacles to Internet Higher levels of access Internet due to some key developments such as a high- access: lack of resources & than Cuba. Still limited speed ALBA-1 fiber optic cable to Venezuela [1] and government control. due to lack of resources & new policy allowing fully owned foreign business in government control. Cuba [2]. In June 2014, Google’s Executive Chairman The government actively Social media and ICT apps Eric Schmidt visited Cuba along with other Google blocks certain social media are not blocked. employees in an effort to learn more about the state of sites & ICT apps. technology on the Island, promote Internet access, and meet with open Internet advocates [7]. In sum, access to the Internet has increased recently in Cuba, and to chat online and share details about their lives. The government is The government is Authors 1 and 3 are bilingual Americans of Cuban assumed to actively assumed to actively descent and are familiar with the culture and customs monitor Internet activity. monitor Internet activity. of this population. Activity online is picking More activism online; Phase 1 asks questions such as: up. Much less dissident people continue to speak • What online sites do Cuban and Venezuelan behavior as in Venezuela. out against government. citizens use? • What do they post there? The government controls Media penetration from • Do they self censor what they post? all media forms & works outside countries is much • How do they receive information about their diligently to silence more prominent in respective countries and the rest of the world? opposing voices online. It’s Venezuela, allowing for • What issues concern them, and do they post difficult for Cubans to find more diverse opinions. about those issues on social media? alternate sources of news. We are using purposeful, snowball sampling, recruiting Bloggers & online activists Bloggers & online activists initial participants through personal contacts and by persecuted & arrested. persecuted & arrested. approaching individuals who post online. Interviews are conducted primarily by text chat and email; however, Government uses social Government uses social audio and video is used when possible. In addition to media sites to spread media sites to spread interviewing participants, we are also examining their propaganda. activity online to determine their frequency of use, the propaganda. type of information they post, and the types of interactions they have. Table 1. Similarities and Differences Between Social Media in Cuba and Venezuela [3, 4, 5] Phase 2: Algorithmic categorization of organic and manicured accounts. Methods Based on the ground truth obtained in Phase 1, we We are using a combination of qualitative and propose to train algorithms to differentiate organic quantitative methods. These complementary methods social media accounts (ones that reflect ordinary will work in tandem through two phases: the qualitative citizens’ viewpoints) from manicured accounts (ones work proposed in Phase 1 lays the groundwork for the that recycle known government positions). We will use machine learning and social network analysis proposed a mixed-methods quantitative approach that leverages in Phase 2. social network, temporal and linguistic signals simultaneously in a single algorithmic framework. Phase 1: Interviews with Cuban and Venezuelan social Data. media users. The outcomes of Phase 1 will drive the sources and the In Phase 1, we are conducting qualitative interviews types of data we collect. We will leverage custom with citizens living in Cuba and Venezuela about their software previously built by our labs to collect data use of social media. In our preliminary fieldwork, we from Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Imgur, etc. In addition, observed that citizens are surprisingly willing and eager we will collect documents, news reports and blog posts known to contain or echo official government positions. thereby guiding the technical feature development and These sources will be derived initially from interview model construction. informant responses; afterward, we will snowball sample from this initial set via recursively crawling References hyperlinks to a broader set of documents representing 1. Biddle, E. R. Rationing the Digital: The Politics and official government positions. Policy of Internet