WANDA: a Measurement Tool for Forensic Document Examiners Measurement Science and Standards in Forensic Handwri�Ng Analysis, NIST Campus, Conference & Webcast 4./5

WANDA: a Measurement Tool for Forensic Document Examiners Measurement Science and Standards in Forensic Handwri�Ng Analysis, NIST Campus, Conference & Webcast 4./5

A FISH called WANDA, 2013 A FISH called WANDA! WANDA: A Measurement Tool for Forensic Document Examiners Measurement Science and Standards in Forensic HandwriCng Analysis, NIST Campus, Conference & Webcast 4./5. June 2013 Katrin Franke, Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Gjøvik University College hp://www.nislab.no Forensics Lab 1 A FISH called WANDA, 2013 Katrin Franke, PhD, Professor § Professor of Computer Science, 2010 PhD in ArCficial Intelligence, 2005 MSc in Electrical Engineering, 1994 § Industrial Research and Development (19+ years) Financial Services and Law Enforcement Agencies § Courses, Tutorials and post-graduate Training: Law Enforcement, BSc, MSc, PhD § Chair IAPR/TC6 – Computaonal Forensics, 2008-2012 § IAPR Young InvesCgator Award, 2009 Internaonal Associaon of Paern RecogniCon Forensics Lab 2 kyfranke.com A FISH called WANDA, 2013 Current Affilia7on § Norwegian Information Security Laboratory (NISlab) Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Gjøvik University College, P.O. Box 191, N-2802 Gjøvik, Norway. § http://www.nislab.no Forensics Lab 3 KyFranke - ICDAR 2007 - Tutorial - Computational Forensics 3 A FISH called WANDA, 2013 Disclaimer § The following slides have been published previously, i.e. § Franke, K., Schomaker, L., Vuurpijl, L., Giesler, S. (2003). FISH-New: A common ground for computer-based forensic writer identification (Abstract). Forensic Science International, Volume 136(S1-S432) p. 84, Proc. 3rd European Academy of Forensic Science Triennial Meeting, Istanbul, Turkey. § Franke, K. (2004). Digital image processing and pattern recognition in the forensic analysis of handwriting (Abstract). In Proc. 6th International Congress of the Gesellschaft für Forensischen Schriftenuntersuchung (GFS), Heidelberg, Germany. § Franke, K., Rose, S. (2004). Ink-deposition model: The relation of writing and ink deposition processes. In Proc. 9th International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (IWFHR), Tokyo, Japan, pp. 173-178. Forensics Lab 4 EAFS 2003-09-23 FISH-new: A Common Ground for Writer Identification Katrin Franke, Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin, Germany Lambert Schomaker, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands Louis Vuurpijl, Nijmegen University, The Netherlands Stefan Giesler, Freiburg, Germany Slide 1 EAFS 2003-09-23 Demands in Forensic Science • Objective measurement and classification, • Robustness and Reproducibility of the results, • Secure against Falsifications. Initiation, Extension and Adaptation of Computer-based investigation methods 00000001000 01100001000 Method: Combining specific Knowledge from • Forensic handwriting examination, • Computer vision, and • Pattern recognition. Slide 3 EAFS 2003-09-23 Computer-based Forensic handwriting examination 00000001000 Systems operating in forensic labs: 01100001000 • SCRIPT (NIFO/TNO, Netherlands) and • FISH (Bundeskriminalamt, Germany) Forensic InformationSystem Handwriting Since 1988 FISH is operating in forensic labs, handwriting is: FISH Database*: • Classified by shape characteristics, 77.000 Investigation cases, • Compared with database, 17.500 Handwritten products, • Presented according recognized similarities, 32.000 Persons, • Digitally stored, and 78.000 Identifications of persons, • Managed. 86.000 Documents. Slide 4 * (31th December 1997) EAFS 2003-09-23 Strategic Meeting: * November 28th-29th, 2001 Status quo in November 2001 Initiator: Bundeskriminalamt, Germany, • Common Standards are lacking Guests: Netherlands • Systems become outdated Forensic Institute, • Improvements can be expected, The Netherlands, If state-of-the-art methods in US Secret Service, US, pattern recognition are used FBI, US. Fraunhofer IPK, GfaI, Germany * Project: Vergelijk - Nijmegen University, Comparison of the Script and the FISH system Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Contracting Entity: Netherlands Forensic Institute - (2000) The Netherlands, Performed at: NICI - Nijmegen University, L. Schomaker and L. Vuurpijl Slide 5 EAFS 2003-09-23 1997 Timeline: Fraunhofer IPK project by BKA/BMI - “ESD” Modular system for the elimination of noisy signals in documents A FISH called 2000 WANDA NICI, Nijmegen University project by NFI - “Vergelijk” Comparison of the Script and the FISH system 2001 August - Initial discussions with BKA for new FISH developments November, 28th-29th - Strategic meeting at BKA 2002 October, 1st - Official project start 2003 May, 19th – Project –result presentation at BKA Until 2006 Continuous advancement and extension of WANDA modules Slide 6 EAFS 2003-09-23 WANDA Team 2003 Artificial Intelligence Institute, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen international Unipen Foundation Slide 7 Project start: 16th September 2002 EAFS 2003-09-23 WANDA Team 2003 • Off-line and on-line handwriting analysis • Forensic signature analysis • Motor-control theory • Pattern recognition and Image processing Artificial Intelligence Institute, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen • System engineering • Fundamental and Applied Research international Unipen Foundation • Industrial Development Slide 8 Project start: 16th September 2002 EAFS 2003-09-23 Fraunhofer IPK Altug Metin Christian Taubenheim Christian Veenhuis Project Participants Katrin Franke Bundeskriminalamt Mario Köppen Werner Kuckuck Martin Peng Axel Kerhoff Nino Palavandishvili Manfred Philipp Ottmar Bünnemeyer Hartmut Gieschen Steffen Rose Tomas Kühn LKA Berlin Wolfgang Penk Gerhard Grube Xiufen Liu Reinhard Zschach iUF / RUG Geertie Zwarts Isabelle Guyon Johan Everts Lambert Schomaker Maarten Jacobs Katrin Franke Lambert Schomaker NICI Louis Vuurpijl Hubert Voogd Stefan Giesler Louis Vuurpijl Maartijn Beenders Slide 9 Merijn van Erp SWE Stefan Giesler EAFS 2003-09-23 Overall idea Standardization of the data-format, Modularization and Extensibility in system concept, Objectification in measurements and Replicability of results. Usage of stable standards: Programming language Java on clients and general server Data interchange language XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML everywhere: • System configuration and plug-in specification, • Data transfer protocol, • Data modeling and annotation, and • Journaling of data processing. Slide 10 EAFS 2003-09-23 Framework concept • User interacts via Java client • Client is the front-end for accessing & processing information • Information is distributed over and hosted by trusted servers • Via their clients, users request services provided by the servers Slide 11 EAFS 2003-09-23 Slide 12 WANDA System EAFS 2003-09-23 Plug-In Concept I Slide 13 EAFS 2003-09-23 Plug-In Concept II Costumer tailored system Investigation Bureaus and/or Forensic Laboratories Signature Analysis and/or Writer Identification System Local Network and/or Remote Access Integration / Connection to systems at work System updates and Extension to latest developments without Framework adaptation - plug-and-play Standardization of Investigation Methods Research Platform Slide 14 EAFS 2003-09-23 Client desktop with Plug-In modules Case Browser Central Document View Slide 15 EAFS 2003-09-23 WANDA Scan and WANDA Tablet Plug-In Slide 16 EAFS 2003-09-23 Combined processing of on- and offline data “Simple” reconstruction of the writing sequence Direct tracing of the handwritten stroke, e.g. for measurements of loop sizes, stroke width or ink deposit Assignment of on-line and off-line handwriting characteristics Off-line specimens synthesis K. Franke, L. Schomaker, W. Penk 2003. Slide 17 EAFS 2003-09-23 WANDA Clean Plug-In K. Franke & M. Köppen 1999. Slide 18 EAFS 2003-09-23 WANDA Annotation Plug-Ins Concept for the Description of Handwriting Characteristics. Script Writer Content Material Slide 19 EAFS 2003-09-23 Script Usage of established categories Usage of unambiguous level - low - medium - high Slide 20 EAFS 2003-09-23 Content - Verbatim Amount of Handwriting Bridges to Linguistic Plain text for further usage Slide 21 TOM BROKAW NBC TV 30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA NEW YORK NY.10112 EAFS 2003-09-23 Writer Consideration of Characteristics that may provide Clues on handwritings individuality. Others -> Cases Management Slide 22 EAFS 2003-09-23 Material Writing instrument Pen tip Ink Paper Writing pad Currently only verbal description ! Slide 23 EAFS 2003-09-23 XML-based data storage?! http://www.fosterfreeman.co.uk ESDA Spectral Slide 25 EAFS 2003-09-23 WANDA Measurement Plug-In WMP van Erp, Vuurpijl, Franke, Schomaker 2003 Slide 26 EAFS 2003-09-23 Concepts of the WMP Measurement Fish Script WMP Ascender/Descender heights √ √ √ Corpus heights √ √ √ Letter widths √ √ √ Slant √ √ √ Upper/lower loops √ √ Line distance √ √ The WMP measures Word width √ all interactive FISH features and Isolate characters √ √ (implicit) employs the WAM Follow characters √ √ (implicit) Allograph matching √ Slide 27 EAFS 2003-09-23 How to use WMP Interactive selection Automatic measurement Online help for novice Hotkeys for experts Slide 28 EAFS 2003-09-23 Diversity in letter shapes…. Within and between writer variation: Exemplars of the character ‘t’ Slide 29 EAFS 2003-09-23 …… and structure through allographs Finding structure in diversity by use of “n-ary” hierarchical clustering Vuurpijl & Schomaker 1997 Considered handwritings of 6600 writers from Europe and the US Slide 30 EAFS 2003-09-23 WAM: Wanda Allograph Matcher The document examiner copy-draws the trajectory of a specific character Use pattern recognition to match this to the database of prototypical allographs Index (annotate) the document as containing an example of this particular allograph Allowing for automated

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    72 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us