1 O.A. NO. 051/973/2019 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIRCUIT BENCH AT RANCHI O.A. NO. 051/973/2019 CORAM HON’BLE SHRI JAYESH V. BHAIRAVIA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE SHRI DINESH SHARMA, MEMBER (ADMINISTRATIVE) DATE OF ORDER 17.10.2019. Rakesh Dutta, aged about 29 years, son of Madhusudan Dutta, Resident of Village Kumhri, P.O.- Pupunki Ashram P.S. Chas (M) District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. By Advocate : None Versus The Steel Authority of India Ltd. Bokaro Stell Ltd., Bokaro P.s. (Chas (M) District- Bokaro, Jharkhand and three others. By Advocate : Shri Prabhat Kumar ORDER (ORAL) Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Member (Judl.) :- This O.A. was listed yesterday but no one was present on behalf of applicant. Looking to interest of justice, this case was adjourned for today with direction to applicant to appear and plead his case today, failing which matter will be decided. Today, this is second round of call but no one is present on behalf of applicant. It is noticed that the applicant in this case is the grandson of late Sindhu Bala who was a permanent employee of SAIL, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro and she was posted as Hospital Attendant in Medical Department of SAIL. She died on 29.11.2006. The applicant has claimed for appointment on compassionate ground and for which he has submitted a representation on 12.07.2011 (Annexure A/8). It appears that after submission of representation, applicant approached the Hon’ble High Court through WPC No. 5661/2011 which was disposed of vide order dated 29.07.2019 with liberty to applicant to approach this Tribunal. In the present O.A., the applicant has contended that the deceased employee was his maternal grandmother and the applicant is son of one of the daughter of the deceased employee and on the death of death of deceased employee her all daughters were married and all the death benefits have been paid to the eldest daughter of the deceased employee and for employment on compassionate ground, 2 O.A. NO. 051/973/2019 he has been recommended by all the daughters of deceased employee. It is contended that without any reason his application has been kept pending. Since no one is appearing on behalf of applicant, it seems that applicant is not interested in pursing this O.A. In view of the above, the O.A. is dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs. (Dinesh Sharma) (Jayesh V. Bhairavia) Member (Admn.) Member (Judl.) mks .