TERNARY LIQUID-LIQUID EQUILIBRIA for the SYSTEMS of AQUEOUS METHANOL SOLUTIONS and PROPANE OR N-BUTANE

TERNARY LIQUID-LIQUID EQUILIBRIA for the SYSTEMS of AQUEOUS METHANOL SOLUTIONS and PROPANE OR N-BUTANE

w = mass of solid per unit area measured from 3) Carslaw, H. S. and J. C. Jaeger: "Conduction of Heat in medium [g/cm2] Solids", 2nd ed , p. 285, Oxford Univ. Press (1959). Wi, w* = value of w at cake surface and total mass 4) Crank, J. : "The Mathematics of Diffusion", Oxford Univ. of solid per unit area [g/cm2] Press (1956). x = distance from medium [cm] 5) Fujita, H.: /. Chem. Phys., 21, 700 (1953). x% = thickness of cake [cm] 6) Hamill, T. D. and S. G. Bankoff: Ind. Eng. Chem. Funda- mentals, 3, 177 (1964). a = defined by Eq. (30) [-] 7) Lee,E. S. andL. T. Fan: Can. J. Chem. Eng.,46, 200(1968). /3 = 0\b\ [-] 8) Okamura, S. and M. Shirato: Kagaku Kogaku, 19, 104, 111 s = porosity [-] (1955). r] - defined by Eq. (14) [-] 9) Satoh, T. and K. Atsumi: J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 3, 92 (1970). 0 = non-dimensional time, defined by Eq. (14) [-] 10) Shirato, M. and T. Aragaki: Advanced Chemical Engineer- x = b/VT [-] ing (Japan), 8, 121 (1974). li = viscosity of filtrate [g/cm-sec] ll) Shirato, M. and T. Murase: ibid, 8, 153 (1974). P, ps = density of filtrate and of solid [g/cm3] 12) Shirato, M., M. Sambuichi, T. Aragaki and H. Kato: Kagaku Kogaku, 31, 359 (1967). 13) idem: AlChEJ., 15, 405 (1969). Literature Cited 14) Shirato, M. and M. Sambuichi: Kagaku Kogaku, 27, 470 1) Atsumi, K., T. Akiyama and M. Miyagawa: /. Chem. Eng. (1963). Japan, 6, 236 (1973). 15) Smiles, D. E.: Chem. Eng. ScL, 25, 985 (1970). 2) Bankoff, S. G.: Adv. Chem. Eng., 5, 15 (1964). 16) Tiller, F. M. and H. R. Cooper: AIChEJ., 6, 595 (1960). Short Communications TERNARY LIQUID-LIQUID EQUILIBRIA FOR THE SYSTEMS OF AQUEOUS METHANOL SOLUTIONS AND PROPANE OR n-BUTANE Katsuji NODA*, Kuraji SATO1, Koichi NAGATSUKA2 AND KlYOHARU ISHIDA Department of Chemical Engineering, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, 432 data for the methanol-n-butane system and the Introduction liquid-liquid equilibrium data for the ternary meth- Liquid-liquid equilibrium data are essential for anol-water-propane and methanol-water-n-butane the selection of solvent and for the design of separa- systems at 0°C and 20°C. liquid-liquidtion processes.equilibriaManyinvestigatorsincluding ternaryhave reportedaqueouson 1. Experimental methanol solutions and /z-paraffin systems. Stephen Mutual solubilities for the methanol-/z-butane and Stephen7) have compiled comprehensive tables system were determined by the cloud point method. of liquid-liquid equilibrium data. Mutual solubili- Ternary liquid-liquid equilibrium data for the meth- ties for methanol-ft-paraffin systems including n- anol-water-propane and methanol-water-^-butane pentane to w-decane have been reported by Kiser3). systems were determined by the samemethodreported As the mutual solubilities for systems of //-paraffin and in the previous paper1} except for the determination water are small and measurementsof the solubilities of compositions by using gas chromatographic analy- for these systems are very difficult, only a few data sis. A column of3 mmdiameter and 3 meter length is have been reported. Kobayashi4) and Mannheimer5) filled with Porapak R as a packing material for gas have reported the mutual solubilities for the propane- chromatograph and hydrogen is used as a carrier gas. water system and Reamer6} for the //-butane-water The sample was injected several times into a gas system. This paper presents the mutual solubility chromatograph and was analyzed by the total amounts Received December 2, 1974. of the sample. The composition of each component 1 Niigata Tekkosho Co., Ltd. was determined by the total areas of the gas chro- 2 Dainichiseika Co., Ltd. matogram. As the amount of water in the hydro- 492 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN Table 1 Solubility data for the methanol-w-butane system, METHANOL weight fraction M e t h a n o l C l o u d p o i n t M e th a n o l C l o u d p o i n t [- C ] [- C ] 0 . 5 5 4 - 1 9 . 2 0 . 2 1 5 - 7 . S 0 . 5 1 6 - 1 5 . 0 0 . 1 6 7 - 9 . 1 0 . 4 4 7 - 1 0 . 8 0 . 1 4 9 - 9 . 5 0 . 3 4 2 - 8 . 1 0 . 0 8 4 - 1 8 . 6 0 . 3 3 1 - 7 . 9 0 . 0 7 4 - 2 3 . 4 Table 2 Equilibrium data for the methanol-water-propane T esystem,m p . weightH y d rfractiono ca r b o n la y er W a te r la y e r [ - C ] P r o p a n e W a t e r M e t h a n o l P r o p a n e W a t e r M e t h a n o l WATER PROPANE 0 0 . 9 9 7 0 . 0 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 9 0 . 4 5 4 0 . 5 3 7 Fig. 1 Liquid-liquid equilibria for the methanol-water- 0 . 9 9 5 0 . 0 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 1 7 0 . 3 4 0 0 . 6 4 3 0 . 9 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 8 0 . 0 14 0 . 0 3 6 0 . 1 9 2 0 . 7 7 2 propane system at 0°C (O) and 20°C ((à")), weight fraction 0 . 9 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 2 8 0 . 0 5 4 0 . 1 2 8 0 . 8 1 8 0 . 8 8 6 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 1 1 2 0 . 1 3 4 0 . 0 2 8 0 . 8 3 8 METHANOL 2 0 0 . 9 94 0 . 0 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 5 9 1 0 . 4 0 2 0 . 9 8 8 0 . 0 0 0 8 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 3 8 8 0 . 5 9 4 0 . 9 8 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 14 0 . 0 2 5 0 . 3 5 1 0 . 6 2 4 0 . 9 7 2 0 . 0 0 15 0 . 0 2 6 0 . 0 6 4 0 . 2 0 6 0 . 7 3 0 0 . 9 4 9 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 4 9 0 . 1 6 3 0 . 0 9 7 0 . 7 4 0 Table 3 Equilibrium data for the methanol-water-«-butane system,T e m p . weightH y d r ofractionc a r b o n l a y e r W a t e r l a y e r [ - C ] ^ - B u t a n e W a t e r M e t h a n o l # - B u t a n e W a t e r M e t h a n o l 0 0 . 9 9 4 0 . 0 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 2 7 8 0 . 7 0 7 0 . 9 8 9 0 . 0 0 0 4 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 3 9 0 . 1 5 6 0 . 8 0 5 WATER n-BUTANE 0 . 9 7 8 0 . 0 0 0 6 0 . 0 2 1 0 . 0 8 2 0 . 0 8 4 0. 8 3 4 0 . 9 6 3 0 . 0 0 0 7 0 . 0 3 6 0 . 1 3 0 0 . 0 4 6 0 . 8 2 4 Fig. 2 Liquid-liquid equilibria for the methanol-water-/*- 0 . 9 4 1 0 . 0 0 0 8 0 . 0 5 8 0 . 2 0 6 0 . 0 2 2 0 . 7 7 2 butane system at 0°C (O) and 20°C ((à")), weight fraction 0 . 9 3 8 0 . 0 0 0 8 0 . 0 6 1 0 . 2 18 0 . 0 18 0 . 7 6 4 2 0 0 . 9 9 6 0 . 0 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 6 0 1 0 . 3 9 6 0 . 9 9 1 0 .0 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 8 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 3 4 5 0 . 6 4 4 anol-water-propane and methanol-water-^-butane 0 . 9 8 8 0 . 0 0 0 7 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 2 2 0 . 2 4 1 0 . 7 3 7 systems at 0°C and 20°C are given in Tables 2 and 3 0 . 9 8 6 0 . 0 0 0 8 0 . 0 13 0 . 0 2 7 0. 2 2 0 0 . 7 5 3 and are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Tieline data for 0 . 9 7 6 0 .0 0 1 0. 0 2 3 0 . 0 4 6 0 . 1 5 7 0 . 7 9 7 0 . 9 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 34 0 . 10 5 0 . 1 0 8 0 . 7 8 7 these systems are fairly well correlated by Ishida2) 0 . 9 5 1 0 . 0 0 1 5 0 . 0 4 7 0 . 16 3 0 . 0 69 0. 7 6 8 coordinates. 0. 9 2 7 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 7 1 0 . 2 8 9 0 . 0 3 6 0. 6 7 5 Conclusion carbon-rich phase is very small, care was taken in Mutual solubility data for the w-butane-methanol analyzing the sample to avoid contamination by the system and ternary liquid-liquid equilibrium data for surroundings, especially water vapor. the methanol-water-propane and methanol-water- Standard reagent propane and ^-butane purchased rc-butane systems at 0°C and 20°C have been presented.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us