September 2003

September 2003

Aviation Strategy Issue No: 71 September 2003 Regional aid and CONTENTS airlines: the real issues Analysis ichael O'Leary, the Ryanair CEO, various French municipali- Regional aid and Mties and British second-home owners are among those out- airlines: the real issues 1-4 raged by the implications of the Strasbourg Court decision declar- ing the airport's payments to the low-cost carrier an illegal subsidy. The new wave What are the real issues uncovered by this? Acting on a complaint by Air France subsidiary Brit Air, the of long-haul Strasbourg Administrative Court on July 24 cancelled two con- all-business airlines 5-6 tracts, which bound the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Strasbourg and Lower Rhine to Ryanair. Brit Air had filed its com- Briefing plaint in December 2002, the Chamber of Commerce is the airport operator. Atlantic Coast Airlines: Having failing to obtain a stay on the judgement, Ryanair Goldilocks, a low-cost strategy stopped operating London-Strasbourg on August 24, terminating a for 50-seaters 7-10 service that was generating about 240,000 passengers a year, compared to about 30,000 a year with Brit Air, and immediately East Africa’s started up services to Baden Baden, 40km across the border in aviation resurgence: Germany. Ryanair has appealed the Strasbourg decision, says it is East African Airlines, Air confident that it will be reversed, at which point it will resume its Tanzania, Kenya Airways and Strasbourg services. Ethiopian Airlines 11-15 Ryanair is clearly determined to play hard, lambasting Air France's projectionist actions and threatening to withdraw services from any French airport where its agreements are challenged and Databases 16-19 to pull out of its Charleroi hub in Belgium where it is facing an EC investigation into possible illegal subsidies provided by the region- Airline traffic and financials Pax INTRA-EUROPEAN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ‘000s Aircraft available 40,000 Lufthansa Regional trends 35,000 30,000 Orders Air France 25,000 20,000 15,000 British Airways PUBLISHER 10,000 Ryanair 5,000 Aviation Economics easyJet James House, LG, 0 22/24 Corsham Street 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003E London N1 6DR Notes: 2003 figures based on current trends, easyJet figures include Go from May 2002, Ryanair figures include Buzz fromJan 2003. Passenger figures include domes- Tel: +44 (0) 20 7490 5215 tic and intra-Europe. Fax: +44 (0) 20 7490 5218 e-mail: [email protected] www.aviationeconomics.com Aviation Strategy Analysis al government of Wallonia, with a decision EC policy due in November. In fact, the Strasbourg Court decision The EC in general, has a pro-consumer came as a surprise to local observers since role and is supportive of low-cost carriers pro- the commissioner representing the French viding affordable travel at high load factors government on the Administrative Court had which are seen to represent an efficient trav- on June 28 recommended that the case el mode. It is against subsidies that distort against the Chamber be dropped. These markets, but cannot be seen to be attacking courts often follow the advice given to them commercial, private airlines like Ryanair when by the government commissioner. it in the past has authorised €20bn-plus of Aviation Strategy The government commissioner had state aid to ailing flag-carriers. is published 11 times a year argued that the funds made available to It has a fundamental role in promoting by Aviation Economics at the beginning of Ryanair by the Chamber of Commerce were regional development, even more critical now the month to promote the Strasbourg region, mostly on that most of the EU has adopted the single the Ryanair website. However, the Court currency, so restricting national governments' Editor: ruled that these funds were not used for that ability to influence economic activity through Keith McMullan purpose but were used mainly for the benefit monetary policy. [email protected] of Ryanair and that this constituted financial Ryanair in some cases has acted as an aid to the airline. catalyst for effective regional development. Associate Editor Heini Nuutinen In a somewhat complex arrangement, the The regional airports, forlorn and totally Chamber of Commerce had committed to pay underutilised pre-Ryanair, and the local Subscription enquiries: Ryanair a one-time sum of €150,000 for the French and Italian authorities, certainly recog- Julian Longin launch of each new daily service from nise Ryanair's role in boosting tourism. For [email protected] Strasbourg and €216,000 or €224,000 per example, the town of Pau in the French Tel: +44 (0)20 7490 5215 year for each daily service operating from Pyrenees raised local funds to persuade Strasbourg. In addition, the Chamber also Ryanair to continue Buzz's service there fol- Copyright: had guaranteed the payment to Ryanair, by a lowing the take-over of the former KLM sub- Aviation Economics combination of the Strasbourg Urban sidiary. (The competing airport of Tarbes All rights reserved Community, the Alsace Region and the which has lost traffic to Pau takes a very dif- Department of Lower Rhine, of an annual ferent view of Ryanair.) Aviation Economics Registered No: 2967706 sum of €492,000 for each daily service oper- Another example: City of Derry airport (England) ated from Strasbourg. Based on two daily ser- located in the north west of Northern Ireland vices between Strasbourg and London now has twice-daily 737 connections to Registered Office: James Stansted, the Chamber's commitment to the London, a service that was inconceivable House, LG 22/24 Corsham St airline amounted to €1.4m a year. before Ryanair struck a deal with the airport’s London N1 6DR VAT No: 701780947 In its decision, the Court made a reference local authority owners. As well as promoting to EC Market Access Regulation 2408/92 (in tourism to Donegal and the Causeway Coast, ISSN 1463-9254 effect the European air transport liberalisation the air link is credited with facilitating new The opinions expressed in this publica- tion do not necessarily reflect the opin- legislation). The Court also quoted Articles 87 business activity in the region, making the mil- ions of the editors, publisher or contribu- and 88 of the Treaty of Rome, relating to com- lions of euros of regional aid that the EU and tors. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in this publica- petition issues, which inter alia require that the UK aid have pumped in work more effec- tion is accurate, but no legal reponsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions. the European Commission is notified of sub- tively. (The counter-argument, which sounds sidies before their execution. It was then up to parsimonious, is that the local authority is The contents of this publication, either in whole or in part, may not be copied, the EC to approve the contracts or otherwise, financing Ryanair to export local consumer stored or reproduced in any format, print- ed or electronic, without the written con- said the Court, noting that the Chamber had spending from Londonderry to London.) sent of the publisher. failed to notify the EC. Ryanair argues that the Strasbourg deci- The EC finds itself it a very awkward situ- sion undermines the ability of publicly owned ation here (the EC being in this case repre- airports to act like, and compete with, private- sented not just by the Transport and ly owned airports. The so-called subsidy, it Competition Directorates but also by the implies, is just the public sector equivalent of Regional Policy, Enterprise and Environment the incentives that private airports offer to new Directorates). entrant airlines - in terms of deep discounts September 2003 2 Aviation Strategy Analysis from rack rates, advertising sup- port, yield-related charges, etc. EUROPEAN PSO ROUTES* Also, Ryanair can point out No of PSO Frequency Timetable that it guarantees exceptional routes Min aircraft size requirement requirement Fares requirement levels of traffic to the regional France 28* Usually 19 seat Yes Yes Usually no max airport as its side of the trans- Germany 5 18-30 seat Yes Yes Max action. Ireland 5 30-seat Yes Yes Min & max, special fares The question of openness Italy 6** 140-seat Yes Yes Max arises here. The use of tax- Norway 13*** 30-seat Yes Yes Max Portugal 10**** Jet specified Yes Usually yes Max, special fares payers' money in whatever Scotland 4***** 8-18-seat Yes No Max form surely has to be revealed Spain 13***** None Yes Usually yes Max and made public knowledge, Notes: * = Of which 18 to/from Corsica, ** = All to/from Sardinia, *** = 13 tender units comprising 61 individual and is in some circumstances routes, **** = Of which 6 to the Azores and 3 to Madeira, ***** = 4 groups comprising 12 individual routes, notifiable to the EC, as pointed ****** = All within Canary islands Source: Air Transport Group, Cranfield University out by the Strasbourg Court. Yet Ryanair PSO subsidies makes non-disclosure a key clause of its airport agreements - Michael O'Leary com- pares the confidentiality of his airline's rela- The challenge for the EC is not to rule on tionship with an airport to that of the con- legal technicalities but to assess where airport fessional box. In reality, however, it is diffi- or route subsidies or quasi-subsidies fit into cult to keep a major public agreement the deregulated intra-European aviation mar- secret - see, for instance,Aviation Strategy, ket. It also has to recognise that aviation like July/August 2001 on Ryanair and Charleroi. all other industries benefits from aid intended So how important are the airport "subsi- to foster regional development. dies" to Ryanair's business model? In a In this regard, the EC might consider the recent teleconference with analysts Ryanair situation in the wider context of Michael O'Leary seemed to imply that the European route subsidies.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us