Glycoside Hydrolases Degrade Polymicrobial Bacterial Biofilms In

Glycoside Hydrolases Degrade Polymicrobial Bacterial Biofilms In

CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Texas A&M Repository EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS crossm Glycoside Hydrolases Degrade Polymicrobial Bacterial Biofilms in Wounds Downloaded from Derek Fleming,a,b Laura Chahin,a* Kendra Rumbaugha,b,c Departments of Surgerya and Immunology and Molecular Microbiologyb and TTUHSC Surgery Burn Center of Research Excellence,c Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA ABSTRACT The persistent nature of chronic wounds leaves them highly susceptible to invasion by a variety of pathogens that have the ability to construct an extracel- Received 15 September 2016 Returned for lular polymeric substance (EPS). This EPS makes the bacterial population, or biofilm, modification 15 October 2016 Accepted 15 November 2016 up to 1,000-fold more antibiotic tolerant than planktonic cells and makes wound Accepted manuscript posted online 21 healing extremely difficult. Thus, compounds which have the ability to degrade bio- November 2016 http://aac.asm.org/ films, but not host tissue components, are highly sought after for clinical applica- Citation Fleming D, Chahin L, Rumbaugh K. tions. In this study, we examined the efficacy of two glycoside hydrolases, ␣-amylase 2017. Glycoside hydrolases degrade polymicrobial bacterial biofilms in wounds. and cellulase, which break down complex polysaccharides, to effectively disrupt Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01998-16. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa monoculture and coculture bio- https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01998-16. films. We hypothesized that glycoside hydrolase therapy would significantly reduce Copyright © 2017 American Society for EPS biomass and convert bacteria to their planktonic state, leaving them more sus- Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Address correspondence to Kendra ceptible to conventional antimicrobials. Treatment of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa Rumbaugh, [email protected]. ␣ on September 11, 2018 by guest biofilms, grown in vitro and in vivo, with solutions of -amylase and cellulase re- * Present address: Laura Chahin, Texas A&M sulted in significant reductions in biomass, dissolution of the biofilm, and an in- Health Science Center College of Medicine, crease in the effectiveness of subsequent antibiotic treatments. These data suggest Bryan, Texas, USA. that glycoside hydrolase therapy represents a potential safe, effective, and new ave- nue of treatment for biofilm-related infections. KEYWORDS Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, biofilms, chronic wounds, dispersal, glycoside hydrolase hronic wound bacterial biofilm infections (CWIs), which include pressure, diabetic, Cvenous, and arterial ulcers, are a major clinical and economic burden worldwide. In fact, chronically infected diabetic foot ulcers are considered the most significant wound care problem in the world (1). Between 5 and 7 million Americans are treated for chronic wounds annually, at an estimated cost of 10 to 20 billion dollars per year, an expense which is expected to increase as the prevalence of risk factors, such as obesity and diabetes, grows (2). CWIs largely owe their chronicity to the inability of the host to clear a biofilm, with or without clinical intervention. Biofilms are communities of microorganisms protected by a self-synthesized layer of complex polymers represented mainly by polysaccharides, proteins, and extracellular DNA (eDNA), also called the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). Biofilms form when a primary, planktonic bacterium irreversibly attaches itself to a surface and commences rapid division and recruitment of other microorganisms by providing more diverse adhesion sites to the substrate (3). Under the protection of the EPS, such polymicrobial infections thrive, making wound healing difficult. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how biofilms can contribute to the chronicity of wounds, including acting as a mechanical barrier against both host-derived and exogenous antimicrobial agents, as well as impeding the reepitheli- alization process. This leads to a perpetual state of inflammation that delays wound healing (4, 5). It is estimated that more than 90% of all chronic wounds contain bacteria February 2017 Volume 61 Issue 2 e01998-16 Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy aac.asm.org 1 Fleming et al. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy FIG 1 Examples of various glycosidic linkages found within the exopolysaccharides of biofilm EPS and the enzymes that hydrolyze them. that are biofilm associated (6), making them up to 1,000-fold more tolerant to antibi- Downloaded from otics and the host immune response (7). Thus, taking into account the alarming increase of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, the added ability of pathogens to reside within the protection of the biofilm matrix all too often makes effective treatment of these infections impossible. In the majority of biofilms, microorganisms make up less than 10% of the dry mass, while the EPS represents more than 90%, with polysaccharides often being a major constituent (8). These polysaccharides provide a variety of functions crucial to the formation and integrity of the biofilm, including, but not limited to, initial surface http://aac.asm.org/ adhesion, aggregation of bacterial cells, water retention, mechanical stability, sorption of nutrients and ions, nutrient storage, and binding of enzymes, and serve as a protective barrier against antimicrobial agents and environmental stressors (8). Thus, active degradation of polysaccharides may prove to be a promising, universally appli- cable approach to clinically addressing biofilm infections. Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are enzymes that act by hydrolyzing the glycosidic linkages between two or more carbohydrates (9). They can be individually characterized by the specific type of linkage that they cleave, such as ␣-1,4 bond hydrolysis by ␣-amylase, ␤-1,4 bond hydrolysis by on September 11, 2018 by guest cellulase, or ␤-1,3 bond hydrolysis by ␤-1,3 galactosidase (Fig. 1)(10, 11). Considering the important contribution of polysaccharides to the biofilm architecture, it has been hypothesized that hydrolyzing the glycosidic linkages that hold them together will lead to degradation of the EPS. Indeed, microorganisms themselves utilize specific glycoside hydrolases to initiate dispersal events. For example, dispersin B is a ␤-hexosaminidase produced by the Gram-negative bacterium Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in order to disperse adherent cells from a mature biofilm (12). It has been shown that exogenous addition of dispersin B is capable of preventing and disrupting biofilms in vitro and in vivo (13–17). The polysaccharide composition of multiple, biofilm-producing bacterial pathogens has been elucidated (18–20). One glycosidic linkage commonly seen within the exopo- lysaccharides secreted by a wide range of pathogens is the ␤-1,4 bond, such as that present in cellulose, an exopolysaccharide produced by many strains of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, and other bacteria (21). Cellulase is a commercially available enzyme that hydrolyzes these ␤-1,4 linkages (22) and thus could theoretically serve to break up a host of biofilm exopolysaccharides into simple sugars. It has been shown that cellulase inhibits biofilm growth by Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on various abiotic surfaces commonly used in medical devices (22, 23). Similarly, ␣-amylase, a GH that acts by cleaving the ␣-1,4 straight-chain linkage, has been previously shown to both inhibit biofilm formation and disrupt preformed biofilms of Vibrio cholerae, Staphylococcus aureus and P. aeruginosa in vitro (24–26). In this study, we aimed to hydrolyze the polysaccharides produced by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in dual-species polymicrobial biofilms by targeting a pair of highly conserved glycosidic linkages. We focused on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa because they are the two most commonly isolated bacterial species in CWIs and are often found together in polymicrobial infections (27, 28). We found that ␣-amylase and cellulase were able to disrupt S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms, leading to increased dispersal and antibiotic efficacy. February 2017 Volume 61 Issue 2 e01998-16 aac.asm.org 2 Enzymatic Degradation of Chronic Wound Biofilms Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Downloaded from FIG 2 GHs reduce the biomass of polymicrobial biofilms. Traditional crystal violet biofilm assays (29) were performed after 48 h of coculturing S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. Planktonic cells were removed, and biofilms were treated with 0.25% GH solutions (␣-amylase, cellulase, or ␣-amylase plus cellulase [AmϩCell]), vehicle, or heat-inactivated (HI) controls for 30 min before they were stained with 1% crystal violet. One-way analysis of variance and a Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparison test were used to test for differences between results. **, P Ͻ 0.01; ***, P Ͻ 0.001. http://aac.asm.org/ RESULTS Glycoside hydrolase treatment reduces biofilm biomass and increases bacterial dispersal. We first tested the ability of ␣-amylase and cellulase to disrupt S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms that were grown on plastic cell culture coverslips. After 48 of bacterial growth, the biofilm-coated coverslips were treated with a 0.25% GH solution for 30 min, and the biomass of the biofilms was estimated by the retention of crystal on September 11, 2018 by guest violet (CV) stain (Fig. 2). A significant reduction in biomass was observed after treatment with both GHs but not with a GH that had been heat inactivated.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us