Reverbnation Crowd Review

Reverbnation Crowd Review

ReverbNation Crowd Review The Timekeeper • Color Theory • 200 reviewers • March 31, 2017 Standard Insight Track Rating Summary Generally, listener reaction to this song was mixed. When asked to rate this song on a scale from 1 to 10, reviewers reported a 6.7 on average, which ranks this song in the 68th percentile of all songs analyzed by Crowd Review. Most listeners rated your song a 7, and did want to hear your song again after listening to it once. When reviewing your song, the most commonly selected words were vocals, lyrics, good, music, beat. According to a sentiment analysis of those written reviews, listener comments 6.7 were generally neutral. Based on the results of this study, this song probably needs a little more work before it’s ready for promotion to a wider audience. 6.7/10 - 68th percentile Song Rating Position Reviewer Rating Distribution Your Song 60 s r e n 40 e t s i L f o r e b m 20 u N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rating 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 All songs Songs in this genre Rating 1 Comment Sentiment Analysis Would you want to hear this song again? 100 90 80 70 60 % 50 No: 42% 40 30 Yes: 59% 20 10 0 Positive Neutral Negative This Song Av erage Would you want to hear this song again? tone love melody 100 artist thought 90 bad softtimehear instruments 80 singer quality 70 electronic beat goodgreat 60 enjoyed % track feel 50 weird vocals voice 40 pretty nice listen 30 music lyrics pianosongs 20 reminds unique 10 work mix soundedinteresting 0 kind Yes No instrumentation This Song Av erage 2 Songwriting Analysis Song Component Rating Average Summary Your song reminded people of Depeche Mode, and made people feel Mellow, Thoughtful and Interested. Listeners were asked to rate their enjoyment of specific components of your song. The most liked component was Artist Name with a rating of 7.39, and the least liked component was Vocal Performance with a rating of 6.42. On average, they rated your song components a 7 7. 7/10 - 100th percentile Song Component Average Position Which well-known artist does this song remind you of most? Your Song Depeche Mode Daft Punk Owl City Justin Biber Postal Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rating All songs Songs in this genre 3 Number of Reviewers who Selected Each Artist Rachel Platten Depche Mode Rick AstleyWeen faded paper figures Nine Inch Nails david bowie noone Brandon Heath Barry Manilow n/aDon't know early depeche mode Depeche Mode Radiohead Swedish House Mafia Awolnation Coldplay Daft Punk Prince Andrew Pink Floyd Bird Owl Ow l City Justin Biber Depeche Mode city Clean Bandit Justin Biber unsure airsupply MgMT nobody Postal Service George Michael Owl City Goytee NA Can't think of one none AV! Seal cars Coldplay Galantis Postal Service willy nelson don't know N/A tears for fears Daft Punk depeche mode Devo no one justin bieber na dj khalad David Bow ie bass hunter None John Mayer The Postal Service DJ Tiesto Zedd Prince FLEETWOOD MAC Moby No idea David McKean Mika Moby Neon Indian Justin Beiber Hot Chip Infected Mushroom 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Count How did this song make you feel? Most Commonly Reported Feelings Mellow Intrigued Chill Relaxed Contemplative Curious Indifferent Existential Thoughtful Calm Bored Happy Hypnotized Interested Peaceful Joyful 20 30 40 50 Mellow 4 Least Commonly Reported Feelings Regardless of how this song was classified, select the genre(s) you find most appropriate for this song. Melancholy Hopeful Irritated Electronica Inspired Alternative Indie Energetic Excited Inquisitive Sad Experimental Pop Nostalgic Intense Confident Sensual Loving EDM Sassy Depressed Angry Ambient Other 0 5 10 15 20 0 25 50 75 100 Count Do you feel the lyrics fit with the music? Ratings of Individual Song Components 100 Vocal Performance 90 Artist Instrumental 80 Name Performance 70 5 60 % 50 Song Lyrics 40 Name 30 20 10 Production Beat Quality 0 Yes No Song Structure This Song Av erage This Song Ov erall Genre 5 Instrumental Vocal 7.10 6.42 6.34 g g n n i 6.89 i t t a a R R 6.72 5.86 This Song Overall Genre This Song Overall Genre Beat Song Structure 6.84 7.04 g g n n i i 6.36 t t a a R R 6.62 5.96 6.51 This Song Overall Genre This Song Overall Genre 6 Sound Quality Lyrics 7.31 6.46 6.09 g g n n i i t t a a R 6.93 R 6.75 5.33 This Song Overall Genre This Song Overall Genre Song Name Artist Name 7.39 7.34 g g n n i i t t a a R R 6.63 6.42 6.57 6.34 This Song Overall Genre This Song Overall Genre 7 Audience Identication Listener Outlet With Highest Affinity Primary Listening Outlet Rhapsody Pandora iHeartRadio App Apple Music YouTube Sirius XM Radio SoundCloud Spotify Pandora YouTube Google Play Music iTunes Spotify Traditional AM/FM R… iTunes Physical Media (CDs… Amazon Prime Music Deezer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Average Rating Would you want to hear this song again? Live Concert Attendance with Highest Affinity Primary Listening Outlet YouTube Spotify Traditional AM/FM R… iTunes Pandora iHeartRadio App SoundCloud Sirius XM Radio 4-10 Amazon Prime Music live performances Physical Media (CDs… Google Play Music attended per year Apple Music Rhapsody Deezer 0 10 20 30 40 50 Count Yes No 8 Number of Live Performances Attended Per Year Would you want to hear this song again? Live Performances Attended Per Year 10 9 0-3 8 7 g 4-10 n i t 6 a R e 5 g 11-20 a r e 4 v A 3 21-30 2 31+ 1 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 21-30 31+ 4-10 11-20 0-3 Count Performances Attended Yes No Ethnicity with Highest Affinity Ethnicity 10 9 8 g n 7 i t a 6 R e 5 g Not Provided a r 4 e v 3 A 2 1 0 d r e … r… … … … … e id r a n A is a th v o C r r H p O o n - e o - is r a o t n H P i r s n o t s f a ia N r o A A E s ( o , e A e o N th k l t it n u c d s h ti o la id a a S B M E W L Ethnicity 9 Would you want to hear this song again? Subgenre Preference with Highest Affinity Ethnicity Christian Metal White (Non-Hispanic) Black, Afro-Caribbe… Christian Rock Latino or Hispanic Christian Rap East Asian or Asian South Asian or Indian Christian Country Not Provided Other Adult Contemporary Middle Eastern or A… 0 50 100 150 200 Count Yes No Preferred Subgenres Would you want to hear this song again? Preferred Subgenre 10 9 Alternative 8 Hard Rock g n 7 i Underground Rap t a 6 Adult Contemporary R e 5 Blues g a r 4 Pop Punk e v 3 Gangsta Rap A 2 Americana 1 World 0 Rockabilly l y o s l o p y e l p k a Boy Band ta tr s u a ill g ta a n k e n m a o m b n e R u a S E R u S Screamo M u e B t a r M a P n o r & s k G y t p a C c a c v s o Christian Country ti n S m o o a g P s a u C R e n ri ti r t H a h s D s G ri a 0 50 100 150 C h E C Count Preferred Subgenre Yes No 10 Age & Gender with Highest Affinity Age & Gender 10 9 8 g 7 n i t a 6 R Female e 5 g a r 4 e v 25-34 A 3 2 1 0 55-64 25-34 35-44 18-24 45-54 65+ Age & Gender Male Female Would you want to hear this song again? Age & Gender 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 0 20 40 60 80 100 Count Female,Yes Female,No Male,Yes Male,No 11 Production Quality Production Quality Rating Summary Listeners rated the production quality of your song a 7.3 out of 10 on average, which ranks in the 86th percentile of all songs analyzed by Crowd Review. The sound quality most listeners associated with the song was Clear. Your song did not make listeners want to dance, and listeners who heard your song on Speakers (High Quality) rated the song quality of your song highly. Based on questions related to radio, the production on 7.3 this song is . 7.3/10 - 86th percentile Production Quality Average Position Radio Readiness Your Song 48% Not Ready for Radio Ready for Radio 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rating 12 Reviewer Engagement Does this song make you want to dance? 100% s r e w e 50% i v e R Yes: 44% No: 56% 0% % % % % % % % % % % % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 Duration Your Song Av erage Most Commonly Selected Sound Quality Most Commonly Reported Qualities Clear Soft Clear Light Thin Light Thin Soft Tinny Tinny Deep 0 25 50 75 100 13 Least Commonly Reported Qualities Listening Method with Highest Sound Quality Rating Speakers (High Quality) Punchy Distorted Loud Headphones (High Quality) Headphones (Low Quality) Speakers (Low Quality) Bass-heavy Noisy Muffled Heavy Laptop Speakers 5 10 15 20 25 Production Quality Ratings by Listening Method Listening Methods 10 9 Laptop Speakers g n i 8 t a R 7 Headphones (High y t i l 6 Quality) a u Q 5 n Speakers (High o i 4 t Quality) c u 3 d o r 2 Headphones (Low P Quality) 1 0 Speakers (Low ) ) ) ) ty ty ty ty rs li li li li e a a a a k Quality) u u u u a e Q Q Q Q p h h w w S ig ig o o H H (L (L p ( ( to s s s s p r e e r a e n n e L k o o k 0 25 50 75 100 a h h a e p p e p d d p S a a S e e H H Percent 14 Compared to songs you hear on the radio, how does the sound Compared to songs you hear on the radio, how loud is this song? quality of this song compare in general? Low er: 17% Low er: 22% Higher: 14% Higher: 17% Same: 62% Same: 69% 15 Commercial Potential Summary Very Likely to Purchase Song After Hearing Based on the results of this report, your song is not likely to be commercially successful.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    31 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us