Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014

Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014

Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document JUNE 2014 INTERNAL DRAFT Information Document Reference Waikato Sports Facility Plan Authors Craig Jones, Gordon Cessford Sign off Version Internal Draft 4 Date 4th June 2014 Disclaimer: Information, data and general assumptions used in the compilation of this report have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Visitor Solutions Ltd has used this information in good faith and makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of this information. Interested parties should perform their own investigations, analysis and projections on all issues prior to acting in any way with regard to this project. Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014 Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 3 June 2014 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 Our challenges 8 3.0 Our Choices for Maintaining the network 9 4.0 Key Principles 10 5.0 Decision Criteria, Facility Evaluation & Funding 12 6.0 Indoor Court Facilities 16 7.0 Aquatic Facilities 28 8.0 Hockey – Artifical Turfs 38 9.0 Tennis Court Facilities 44 10.0 Netball – Outdoor Courts 55 11.0 Playing Fields 64 12.0 Athletics Tracks 83 13.0 Equestrian Facilities 90 14.0 Bike Facilities 97 15.0 Squash Court Facilities 104 16.0 Gymsport facilities 113 17.0 Rowing Facilities 120 18.0 Club Room Facilities 127 19.0 Bowling Green Facilities 145 20.0 Golf Club Facilities 155 21.0 Recommendations & Priority Actions 165 Appendix 1 - School Facility Survey 166 Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 4 June 2014 1.0 INTRODUCTION Plan Purpose The purpose of the Waikato Facility Plan is to provide a high level strategic framework for regional sports facilities planning. It is designed to provide direction on what should be done and crucially, what should not be done. The plan is designed to focus thinking at a network wide sports facilities level with emphasis on national, regional and sub-regional assets, while also capturing local level facility data. Using this Plan Like all high level plans, especially those as ambitious in scope, both geographically and in terms of content as this plan, additional more detailed planning will be required. The plan should not be seen as a replacement for this detailed focused research and analysis. As additional sports codes undertake or update their existing national and regional sports facility plans it is envisaged that this plan will require updating. However, given the plan is trying to examine issues based on available evidence at a network wide level, some specific code aspirations may not align. The plan is envisaged to be used as a tool to assist the coordination of sports facility provision and optimisation. Methodology The information summarised in this plan was collected using a mix of survey, consultation, and secondary data sources. This triangulated approach provided the best means to get the most comprehensive data coverage possible with available resources. The specific approaches used are briefly summarised below: Primary Facility Survey A general inventory survey was developed with Sport Waikato and Waikato Councils for distribution to sport facility owners and/or managers to identify what facilities were available, what their regional roles were, and what their associated needs or issues were. These surveys were distributed to local contacts by staff coordinators at each of the Region’s 10 Territorial Local Authorities. To maximise survey response a range of follow-up processes were implemented. Council staff also provided survey entries for facilities associated with council or council lands. This process generated over 358 individual survey responses, which in turn represented over 734 individual facility responses. School Facility Survey A supporting survey was developed to identify the complementary facility resources available in the primary and secondary education sector, and to identify issues affecting community sport use of school facilities. This was coordinated through Sport Waikato and circulated to all 310 schools in the Waikato Region. To maximise survey response a range of follow-up processes were implemented. This process generated 115 survey returns, representing a response rate of 37% overall. This in turn included 75% of Waikato Secondary Schools, which is important as secondary schools tend to have larger and higher level sport facilities. The gap in survey responses was addressed in part through use of Ministry of Education data on school pools and gymnasiums. RSO Survey A further supporting survey was developed to identify strategic regional facilities, issues and needs from a Regional Sports Organisations (RSOs) perspective. This was coordinated through Sport Waikato and Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 5 June 2014 circulated to their RSO contacts. To maximise survey response a range of follow-up processes were implemented. This process generated 19 survey returns. RSO input was also sought through the consultation process. Consultation Ongoing consultation was conducted with the Technical Working Group and Project Steering Group. This was undertaken to define the investigation scope, to review returns and identify gaps and priorities for follow up. In some cases specific approaches were made to some groups to provide additional information. Secondary data Secondary data review was undertaken within the scope of the project brief to identify available strategic documents. Secondary data was also sourced where gaps in the inventory database were identified. The main example of this was the Ministry of Education pools and gymnasiums data. In some cases specific approaches were made to sports groups for facility information, or internet and document sources were searched. Database All of this information is being compiled into a data base resource. The survey results provide the primary database, which is being refined and added to for follow up uses by Sport Waikato and Territorial Authorities as required. Additional or updated information is being incorporated when provided. Limitations The plan is based on available data at the time of writing. Given the reliance on secondary data and primary data from third parties it is likely that some data emissions exist (especially given the project’s significant scope). However, the plan represents the most comprehensive regional facility data source currently available. This plan does not replace the need for additional focused planning and analysis at a code and the specific facility level. As additional sports codes undertake or update their existing national and regional sports facility plans it is envisaged that this plan will require updating. However, given the plan is trying to examine issues based on available evidence at a network wide level for a diversity of sports some individual code aspirations may not align with the plan. Facility Hierarchy Definitions The following general facility hierarchy definitions have been used within the Plan: International: A facility with the ability to host international competitions / events (i.e. between nations) National: A facility with the ability to host regional representative competitions (including professional and semi professional franchise competitions involving teams from outside New Zealand) and / or to serve as a national high performance training hub for one or more sports codes. Regional: A facility with the ability to host inter-regional and internal regional competitions and /or serves as a regional high performance training hub for one or more sports codes. Sub Regional: A facility with the ability to draw significant numbers of teams/competitors from across adjacent territorial authority boundaries for either competition or training purposes. Local: A facility with the ability to serve a local catchment’s basic sporting needs. This catchment will predominantly be drawn from within a single territorial authority. Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 6 June 2014 It is important to understand that a facility at a higher hierarchy level may also meet the needs all the way down to a local level. For example, the Avantidrome is an international facility which also serves the very local level needs of the residents of Cambridge. Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 7 June 2014 2.0 OUR CHALLENGES The Waikato sports facility network faces a number of challenges. These challenges include: Population Distribution and Changing Demographics: The Waikato Region is a large area with an unevenly distributed population of around 418,500 (2013 estimate). Looking forward, approximately 90% of the regional population growth is projected to occur within the Hamilton, Waikato and Waipa districts, with other territorial authorities projected to be largely static or declining. The population will also be aging in all districts, with the highest growth age-group across the Waikato being among those aged over 65 years. The location and types of sport and recreation facilities and services offered will therefore need to adapt over time so they are not mismatched with community needs. Maintaining Assets, Facility Sustainability and Service Levels: Community sport and recreational assets are provided by a range of entities including, territorial authorities, charitable trusts, the Ministry of Education (via schools), and community groups and clubs. Maintaining aging assets, current service levels and facility sustainability is likely to become increasingly difficult in some geographic

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    166 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us