Columbia University GSAPP AAD Summer 2015 Critic: Jeffrey Johnson [email protected] TA: Jiteng Yang [email protected] Megablock Urbanism Rockefeller Center Reconsidered New York, NY USA Rockefeller Center - Original Design in 1931 Image: wirednewyork.com Intro: The world continues to urbanize, in many regions at an astonishing pace, and we as architects must find ways to intervene in its physical metamorphosis. We are for the first time in history more urban than rural. Existing cities are expanding and new ones are being formed without historic precedent. How we continue to urbanize is of huge consequence. And, how we understand this phenomenon is critical to our ability to participate in the future urbanization of the world. This means we must invent new ways of thinking about cities and be agile enough to continuously modify and/or discard even the most recently developed theories and strategies. What possible socially and ecologically sustainable solutions can be invented for accommodating future urban growth? What role does architecture play in these newly formed megacities? 1 AAD Studio Summer 2015 - Johnson Superblock / Megablock: For many cities around the world, large-scale superblock development provides the default solution for accommodating urban growth. Superblocks, in their contemporary form, are byproducts of modernism – from Le Corbusier; to Soviet microrayons; to Lúcio Costa and Oscar Niemeyer’s Brasilia; to Mao’s danwei (factory units); to Steven Holl’s Linked Hybrid in Beijing. Varying in size from 8 hectares to over 50 hectares, with populations from 1,000’s to over 100,000, superblocks are spatial instruments with social, cultural, environmental, and economic implications, operating between the scales of architecture and the city. Over the past 7 years, Asia Megacities Lab has been focusing much of its research on the ‘Megablock.’ What we hope to accomplish with our research is to redefine these superblocks--or ‘Megablocks’—as laboratories for the consequences, opportunities, and potential global proliferation of large-scale urban models. We hope to discover through our research unique and emerging urbanisms that can be deployed in a multiplicity of urban contexts. The studio provides the ‘speculative’ and ‘projective’ component to the research - the design of the ‘Megablock’ becomes the experiment. How can the ‘Megablock’ become a socially and ecologically sustainable prototype for future urbanization? Megablock Urbanism – Manhattan Rockefeller Center Lincoln Center Image: wirednewyork.com Image: Keithyorkcity.com The studio will focus on a Manhattan superblock. The ubiquitous Manhattan grid was established in 1811. The grid created oblong-shaped blocks, varying slightly in size (approx. 200’ x 1,000’), comprised of a repetition of parcels organized linearly and back-to-back (approx. 25’ x 100’). With the advance of technology and the ability to build bigger, the single parcel proved too constraining to accommodate the more ambitious projects. With the introduction of mega- projects in the 20th century, even whole blocks proved inadequate. As a result, multiple blocks were combined to accommodate a new ‘mega’ scale. Is the superblock still a relevant model for urban development? 2 AAD Studio Summer 2015 - Johnson Rockefeller Center – Bird’s Eye Rendering Image: wirednewyork.com Project: Rockefeller Center Reconsidered Birth of the Mega The challenge of the studio is to re-conceptualize Rockefeller Center in New York City. The studio will be divided into two main phases. Phase I: Urban The first phase will focus on the urban scale and massing. Collectively, or in 2 or 3 groups, the studio will re-plan Rockefeller Center at the urban scale. As a starting point, the project will return to the site configuration that existed at the conception of the original project planning. The new master plan(s) and massing studies will provide the urban context for architectural proposals. Phase II: Architecture The second phase will focus on the architectural scale. Each student, or small team, will design in more detail the architecture of the urban scale plans. This exercise will fulfill the urban ambitions through architecture. 3 AAD Studio Summer 2015 - Johnson Rockefeller Center In the late 1920’s, the ambitions of two entities aligned in Midtown Manhattan. Columbia University, a major landowner of properties throughout Manhattan, was planning a new campus in Morningside Heights. It was looking for revenue opportunities to help fund the project. At the same time, John D. Rockefeller was looking for an available site he could develop and provide a new space for the Metropolitan Opera. Thus, Rockefeller Center was born. Rockefeller initiated the development project in part to provide a new space for the Metropolitan Opera. However, with the stock market crash of 1929, the Metropolitan Opera could not commit to a lease, and Rockefeller decided to move forward with the project despite their absence. The project was the largest private building project of modern times.1 The Midtown site, bounded by Fifth and Sixth avenues, and from 48th Street to 51st Street, equaled 22 acres (89,000 m2). The total proposed building area was 8,000,000 square feet (743,000 m2) and comprised of multiple building, uses and functions. Rockefeller Center marked the birth of the ‘mega’ scale. Associated Architects Associated Architects Image: supercrits.com Numerous design schemes on a variety of possible sites were devised during the initial planning of the project. All of the early schemes assumed the opera house would be the centerpiece of the development. Some of the schemes were quite radical and inventive. However, once Rockefeller was committed to the development, and the Metropolitan Opera was detached from it, a new design team was formed - less to produce an innovative scheme then one to exploit the real estate value of the site. In 1929, the firm Todd, Robertson & Todd were hired to lead the project with architects Reinhard & Hofmeister and Benjamin Morris, Harvey Wiley Corbett (with a young Wallace Harrison) and Raymond Hood as consultants, from then on known as the Associated Architects. 1 Roussel, Christine (May 17, 2006). The Art of Rockefeller Center. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 4 AAD Studio Summer 2015 - Johnson Form follows Finance With the loss of the Metropolitan Opera as the centerpiece of the project, the Rockefeller team scrambled to find a substantial tenant that would prove to be, as Todd described, “an important concern of national and international standing.”2 To lure possible tenants, a design proposal was devised that could offer a substantial office building to a major company. Radio Company of America (RCA) was offered a fifty-story building at the center of the project, which shaped the final design of the entire development. (The tower was later heightened to seventy stories.) The initial sketch for the proposal was generated by Todd’s request by his architects Reinhard & Hofmeister.3 It became the pragmatic blueprint for the development. Clearly, the priority of the planning shifted entirely to maximizing leasable real estate. The midtown area of Manhattan was quickly transforming into a vibrant commercial center. Being replaced were residential brownstones and privately owned mansions of the wealthy. The once residential streets were being conceived as continuous walls of shops and commercial functions. The now famous promenade and sunken plaza were less conceived as public civic spaces then opportunities to funnel more customers into the development, whether from Fifth Avenue to the east or the subway trains below. For many involved, the loss of the Metropolitan Opera was far from unfortunate. In fact, it was seen as a great opportunity to fully exploit the site’s real value. From the beginning of the planning process, even with the Metropolitan Opera, the project was conceived as a speculative development. The project was only feasible if it could generate significant income. Producing income for a project of this scale required the ability to accommodate and attract a multitude of functions. Already the largest private development project of its time, its mixed- use programming was also one of its most diverse and ambitious. Planning for a variety of specific architectural needs and requirements was paramount. As Rem Koolhaas stated in his book, Delirious New York, “Rockefeller Center is the most mature demonstration of Manhattanism’s unspoken theory of the simultaneous existence of different programs on a single site, connected only by the common data of elevators, service cores, columns and external envelope.”4 Even though the Metropolitan Opera was no longer included in the planning, entertainment was still considered a critical component to the development. Four theaters were planned together to create Radio City. A wide variety of popular entertainment could be shown in Radio City, including multiple forms of performance, cinema and theater. In addition to the theaters, the program mix for Rockefeller Center included prime retail spaces throughout the street level and lower levels that connected to the subway. Two hundred thousand square feet of new office spaces – equivalent to the Empire State and the Bank of 2 Stern, Robert A.M., Gregory Gilmartin and Thomas Mellins. New York 1930: Architecture and Urbanism Between the Two World Wars (New York: Rizzoli, 2009.), P. 638. 3 Koolhaas, Rem. Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan (The Monacelli Press, December 1,