A New Actinopterygian Fish Species from the Late Permian Beaufort Group, South Africa

A New Actinopterygian Fish Species from the Late Permian Beaufort Group, South Africa

Palaeont. a.fr., 37, 25-40 (2001) A NEW ACTINOPTERYGIAN FISH SPECIES FROM THE LATE PERMIAN BEAUFORT GROUP, SOUTH AFRICA by Patrick Bender Council for Geoscience, Private Bag Xl12, Pretoria, South Africa. e-mail·bender@.?li:co.za ABSTRACT A new genus and species of actinopterygian (ray-finned) fish, Bethesdaichthys kitchingi, is described from the Tatarian, Late Permian, Lower Beaufort Group of South Africa. Bethesdaichthys is presently known from three localities, two in the New Bethesda and one in the Victoria West districts of the Karoo region respectively. The fossils were recovered from within the Abrahamskraal Formation Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone at the Victoria West locality, and from an uncertain Formation possibly closely equivalent to the Balfour Formation, within the Dicynodon Assemblage Zone at the New Bethesda sites. Bethesdaichthys kitchingi is a fusiform fish, up to approximately 300mm in total length, with the skull displaying a moderately oblique suspensorium, and a maxilla with a large sub-rectangular postorbital blade. Furthermore there is a complex offour suborbital bones adjacent to the orbit. The pectoral fin is large relative to body size and the tail is heterocercal with an elongate tapered dorsal body lobe. The anterior midflank scales in particular exhibit a distinctive dermal ornamentation consisting of numerous ganoineridges. The phylogenetics and interrelationships of Bethesdaichthys kitchingiare examined. It appears to exhibit a relatively conservative morphology similar to that found in possibly related Carboniferous taxa such as the South African taxa Australichthysand Willomorichthys. Bethesdaichthys kitchingiis derived relative to stem-actinopterans such as the Howqualepis and Mimia, and also derived relative to southern African Palaeozoic actinoptyerygians such as Mentzichthys jubbl; and Namaichthys schroeden; but basal to stem­ neopterygians such as Australosomus, Perleldus and Saurichthys. KEYWORDS: Bethesdaichthys, palaeonjscid, Late Permian, Tatarian, Beaufort Group, Actinopterygii. INTRODUCTION The sedimentary rocks of the Beaufort Group have A new genus and species of Late Permian yielded diverse and important fossils, including macro­ actinopterygian fish is described here from the Lower and micro-palaeobotanical remains, vertebrate and Beaufort Group of South Africa, based essentially on invertebrate body fossils and traces (Hancox & Rubidge well preserved and diagnostic skeletal elements. 1997). Analysis of the fossils provides information on the Taxonomically relevant actinopterygian fossil remains, evolution of life in the Permo-Triassic, and has proved in particular diagnostic skull remains, have up to now not significant in unravelling the geological development of been described from the Lower Beaufort Group, the Karoo Basin (Hancox & Rubidge 1997). On the although incompletely preserved skeletal remains and basis of its uniquely large and relatively complete isolated body scales of fossil fish have been recorded continental Permo-Triassic sedimentary sequence, the from much or most of the biostratigraphic range (see Beaufort Group is considered almost as a 'world Broom 1913a, 1913b;lubb & Gardiner 1975; Woodward stratotype' for continental Permo-Triassic age 1888,1889,1893). Recently, Bender (2000) documented geological and palaeontological research (Smith 1990). for the first time well preserved and relatively complete The Beaufort Group is particularly renowned for its actinopterygian remains from the Lower Beaufort diversity and range of therapsid fossils, which elucidate Group, tentatively describing several new species, the evolutionary transition to mammals (Broom 1932; including Bethesdaichthys kitchingi. SACS 1980). The therapsids have been utilized as a Bethesdaichthys kitchingi is an actinopterygian fish basis for an eightfold biostratigraphic subdivision of the which belongs to a group of early actinopterygian taxa Group (Rubidge 1995), with the Lower Beaufort Group collectively referred to as "palaeoniscids" (Traquair comprising six of the eight biozones (Figure 1). 1877-1914; Gardiner 1967) or "Palaeoniscomorpha" (Lund et al 1995). It is generally accepted that the MATERIALS AND METHODS palaeoniscids constitute a paraphyletic group of mostly Three laterally compressed Bethesdaichthys Palaeozoic actinopterygians (Coates 1993), with a global specimens were recovered from a Tapinocephalus distribution. These palaeoniscids or lower Assemblage Zone locality on the farm Blourug, Victoria actinopterygians represent the "primitive" or basal West district, Abrahamskraal Formation, Adelaide members of the Subclass Actinopterygii (Gardiner Subgroup, Lower Beaufort Group. These specimens 1973). were contained within a single, thin, buff-coloured, fine 26 STRATIGRAPHY ASSEMBLAGE WEST 0 F 24°E EAST OF 24°E NORTHERN OFS ZONE 7:Z 7777:?<:::: E ..•..•.. ~~~~~~~ .. ~ .•...•.••..........•.. CYllogllathus ~ - ;:J U 0 .... ~ DRIEKOPPEN F . 00 BURGERSDORP F. '-'CQ ~ ;:J (/J ~ ~< ~ E-< (/J > .. :.:.:: .. :.... ::::: .. :.:::. )< ... ....... .......... 1\<) .: :: : U... ·:.:.C·. 8GG 07 ~ Lystrosaurus ~ I••• ••• ••••••••••••• :·:· ? < Iii ~G~. 1·<% ~R~ f. E-< ~dt(tn ~B~ ..... .. :: .. :.::::::::;::.::::::: - I••••• •·•· •••••••• · ?? ••••• :••• ·:.:U •• ··:.·:·.:.< >? I> ::.:: <. ::::::: Palingkloof M. Harrismith M. f--- ::::.:. < ;~:;:;:,: .;; ~ j%i~ ; ~ Elandsberg M. It : W;rJ 0 ~ ~ ••••••••••••• c.!i :z E-- ~ ~ ~ ... 0 ~ •••••• •••• ·2 •• ••••· , .·. ,112111 0111 Q DicYIIOdoll ~ ~ jSjtj"J u z ~ 0 .· ........... ·.·.·.?i· .. I· ,Sill;;;1 ~]mi ~ -< ....:l ~ ~ ~ I) ):.: ••• U): ••• )C)C)) .. •••••••• •• 1=0 H 1=0-< 0 ~ ;:J :z 0 Steenkalllpsv lakte M. Daggaboersnek M. ~ I'C:UU'}:tt>: '-' CQ ::::::::,,:;:;:>:::>:: ;:J ::·:.:·:::·:·:·::: ...•• :.... ·•. :.i.·:· •.••. \ •. ....(/J ~ :;;: J~bi~ .· ...... 1•••••••••• ••••• ••• •••• g~Ji#igj) •• c••••• Cistecephalus ...l 'Z .... ~ I;!);;:I~! ~ <.... < ~ ~ Hoed emak•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••er M. E-- ~ :::::. :::::: MIDDLETON F. Tropidostoma ~ ~ 'ii::,II: 1~ ·1· ••••••••• •••••• Pristerognathus VOLKSRUST F. ABRAHAM SKRAAL KOONAPF. Tapillocephalus F. Eodicynodoll ~ ~ 0 ~ KOEDOES BERG F./ WATERFORD F./ c.!i -< WATERF ORDF. FORT BROWN F. U U ~ Sandstone-rich Unit Figure 1. Lithostratigraphic units and Vertebrate Assemblage Zones of the Beaufort Group (after Rubidge et af 1995). 27 to medium grained sandstone unit, which outcrops over SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY a lateral distance of approximately 70m, and contains Class Actinopterygii Woodward 1891 numerous specimens of other early actinopterygian Infraclass Actinopteri Cope 1871 species. Until now the exact biostratigraphic zone of the Genus Bethesdaichthys gen. nov. site has been uncertain, but as skull elements of a dinocephalian therapsid were found approximately 15m Derivation ofname: Named after the Karoo mountain below the fish site, it appears that the site falls within the hamlet, Nieu Bethesda, which is close to the Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone. Wilgerbosch site where the first specimen of this taxon A total of 15 Bethesdaichthys specimens were was found. Bethesda means "place of flowing waters" recovered from a Dicynodon Assemblage Zone (Bible: John, Chap. 5: 2-4), probably appropriate to Late roadside locality on the farm Wilgerbosch, New Permian fluvial conditions in the region of the Bethesda district, Adelaide Subgroup, Lower Beaufort Wilgerbosch fossil fish site. The suffix -'ichthys' is Group. These specimens were derived from a blue­ derived from the ancient Greek word for fish. green to green, ripple cross-laminated, silty mudstone with a mudstone veneer on the upper surface; and also Diagnosis: A fu siform fish , approximately 300cm in from an interbedded mudstone/siltstone/fine-grained total length. Skull relatively broad, with a moderately sandstone sequence, up to 13 cm thick with fossil fish oblique suspensorium. Dermopterotic broadens found throughout the sequence. A single specimen was anteriorly and does not suture with the nasal. recovered from a site located at a reservoir also on the Dermosphenotic is a crescent-shaped bone. Snout farm Wilgerbosch and approximately 35m region consists of a small premaxilla, antorbital, narrow stratigraphically above the roadside site; preserved in a rostral and fairly elongate nasal. Jugal is a broad wedge­ blue-green siltstone horizon which is situated below a shaped bone. Maxilla has a large subrectangular laminated sequence similar in form to that at the roadside postorbital blade. Dentition consists of a median row of site. The formational designation of the Wilgerbosch large pointed conical teeth and an outer row of numerous sites is uncertain (Cole et al. in press), but they appear smaller pointed teeth. Preopercular with almost right­ to be situated in roughly the stratigraphic equivalent of angled inflexion between the wedge-shaped dorsal, and the Balfour Formation (see Figure 1). ventral limbs. There is a complex of four suborbital Most specimens required mechanical and chemical bones including a large triangular suborbital between the preparation before analysis was possible. Air scribes maxilla and the jugal. Opercular is broad and and an assortment of needles and probes were used rectangular, subopercular approximately 2/3 of the initially to remove covering rock matrix, and in certain height of the opercular with an obliquely angled ventral cases to finely prepare the specimen surface prior to margin. Branchiostegal rays number nine. Distal analysis. A dilute 10% solution of acetic acid was

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us