Relative Salinity Tolerance of Potato Cultivars Assessed by <Emphasis Type="Italic">In Vitro </Emphasis> S

Relative Salinity Tolerance of Potato Cultivars Assessed by <Emphasis Type="Italic">In Vitro </Emphasis> S

Amer J of Potato Res (1998) 75:207-210 207 Relative Salinity Tolerance of Potato Cultivars Assessed By In Vitro Screening Tala Khrais 1, Y. Leclerc 2, and Danielle J. Donnelly3 ~Graduate student, 3Associate Professor., Plant Science Department, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, 21 111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9. -~Potato Physiologist. Potato Centre, New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, FlorenceviUe, NB, Canada E0J 1K0. Please send all correspondence to: Danielle J. Donnelly, Plant Science Department, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 3V9, phone: (514) 398-7851 (ext. 7856#), fax: (514) 398-7897, e-mail: [email protected]. ABSTRACT imiento (longitud de las ralces y de los brotes, peso fresco y seco) en la cosecha y se corrigieron debido a One hundred and thirty European and North Amer- sus diferencias en el vigor de la planta. Estos valores ican potato cultivars were assayed in vitro for salinity relativos fueron sujetos a un awl]i~is de multivariaci6n (NaC1) tolerance. A modified single-node cutting bioas- de grupos. La suma de los rangos relativos a 40, 80 y say was used in which cultivars were exposed to a 120 mM NaCI separaron los cultivares en 8 unidades. range of NaC1 levels (0, 40, 80, and 120 mM), in a Los cultivares Amisk, Belrus, Bintje, Onaway, Sierra y Murashige and Skoog-based medium, for 1 month. Eval- Tobique estuvieron en la unidad con mayor tolerancia uations were performed twice for each cultivar at each a la salinidad yen el grupo con mayor vigor, con excep- salt level, using five single-node cuttings. Six vegeta- cidn de Tobique. Se recomienda el empleo de estos cul- tive growth parameters (shoot and root lengths, fresh tivares para un estudio futuro. and dry weights) were measured at the time of harvest and corrected for differences in cultivar vigor. These INTRODUCTION relative values were subjected to multivariate cluster analysis. The sum of the relative rankings at 40, 80, and A limited number of potato cultivars (cvs.) have been 120 mM NaC1 partitioned the cultivars into 8 units. The evaluated for salinity tolerance in vitro (Arslan eta/., 1987; cultivars Amisk, BelRus, Bintje, Onaway, Sierra, and Elhag, 1991; Morpurgo, 1991; Morpurgo and Rodriguez, 1987; Tobique were in the most salinity tolerant unit and in Naik and Widholm, 1993; Zhang et al., 1993). The common the top cluster group for vigor with the exception of technique has been to subject stem cuttings with one or more Tobique. These cultivars can be recommended for fur- axillary buds, excised from in vitro plantlets, to salt stress in ther study. vitro. The validity of in vitro screening procedures was based on correlations between vegetative growth in vitro and RESUMEN haulm growth (Naik and Widholm, 1993) or yield parameters Se hicieron experimentos in vitro con ciento (Elhag, 1991; Morpurgo, 1991) in the field. NaC1 was mainly treinta cultivares de papa europeos y norteamericanos used in assessing salt tolerance in vitro. There is some incon- paxa analizar su tolerancia a la salinidad (NaC1). Se sistency in the literature concerning the precise level suitable utiliz6 un bioensayo modificado de esquejes de un s61o for effective in vitro screening. The use of one relatively high nudo en el cual los cultivares fueron expuestos a un level of NaC1 (103 or 154 mM) compared with a 0-level control rango de niveles de NaC1 (0, 40, 80 y 120 mM), en un failed to quantify differences among cultivars in vitro (Mor- medio Murashige y Skoog durante un rues. Las evalua- purgo, 1991; Morpurgo and Rodriguez, 1987). Progressive ciones se realizaron dos veces por cada cultivar en cada reduction in two parameters, shoot length and shoot fresh nivel de sal, empleando cinco esquejes con un solo weight, occurred as NaCl levels increased from 0 to 40, 80, nudo. Se midieron seis pard~netros vegetales de crec- and 120 mM (Elhag, 1991). Evaluation at a range of salinity levels appears useful and may involve differential gene expression at different stress levels (Ashraf, 1994). Accepted for publication March 25, 1998. ADDITIONALKEY WORDS:Cluster analysis, NaC1, single-node cutting, Different morphological parameters have been recom- Solanum tuberosum. mended for ranking cultivars in vitro for salt tolerance 208 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH Vol. 75 weight were significantly correlated with each other, in Experimental Design and Data Analysis both in vitro and in vivo experiments, and with tuber yield A completely randomized design factorial experiment in vivo (Elhag, 1991), while root fresh weight in vitro was was conducted involving 520 treatment combinations of cul- positively correlated with tuber yield in vivo (Morpurgo, tivars and salt levels. To prevent confounding of treatment 1991). effects with micro environmental effects for this large num- The objective of this research was to evaluate the salin- ber of culture tubes, racks of test tubes were re-randomized ity (NaC1) tolerance in vitro of 130 European and North on a weekly basis. Evaluations were performed twice, for American potato cvs. and to rank them based on in vitro each cultivar, at each salinity level, with each replicate con- growth parameters. sisting of five single-node cuttings. Ward's minimum-variance cluster analysis (SAS Insti- tute, 1989) was selected for its distinct advantage of present- MATERIALS AND METHODS ing the ranking, based on several growth parameters, of a large number of cultivars in a single dendrogram. Growth Multiplication of In Vitro Material data at each NaC1 level were corrected for differences in cul- In vitro plantlets of 130 cvs. (Table 1) were received tivar vigor in vitro, using values from the 0-level control from the New Brunswick Plant Propagation Centre, New medium. The data matrix was then standardized prior to the Brunswick Dept. of Agric. & Rural Devel., Canada. The analysis to remove the arbitrary effects due to the different plantlets were micropropagated in 25 x 150 mm Pyrex glass scales of measurement of the variables. Relative salinity tol- culture tubes on 15 ml of agar-solidified (0.7%; Anachemia, erance of the 130 cultivars was determined based on multi- Lachine, QC) modified MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) variate analysis of the relative means of the six growth basal salt medium supplemented with organic addenda as parameters for each level of NaC1 (40, 80, or 120 mM). previously described (Zhang et al., 1993). The pH was ad- justed to 5.7 prior to autoclaving at 121 C for 15 min. Cultures RESULTS were incubated under 16/8 h D/N, 40 llmolm-2s-1 photon flux Multivariate analysis on the means of the six growth para- density (cool-white fluorescent light), with temperatures of meters in 0-NaCI control medium divided the cultivars into 25_+2 C. three cluster groups. These represented the relative vigor of each cultivar with i being the greatest and 3 the least (Table In Vitro Screening 1, 0 mM NaC1). Multivariate analysis on the relative means of Single-node cuttings (Arslan et al., 1987; Elhag, 1991; six growth parameters indicated three cluster groups at 40 Zhang eta/., 1993) had no apparent disadvantage over five- and 120 mM NaC1 and four cluster groups at 80 mM NaC1 node cuttings (Morpurgo, 1991; Morpurgo and Rodriguez, (Table 1) with 1 being the most tolerant and 3 or 4 the least. As 1987), were more economical of plant material, and there- salinity levels increased, the number of cultivars in the top- fore, were employed in this study. Apical cuttings were less ranked cluster group decreased. Ranking based on the rela- influenced by salt than single-node cuttings from lower on tive means of six growth parameters, averaged over the three the stem (Nalk and Widholm, 1993) so were discarded in this salt levels, can not be recommended. This overestimated the study. Single-node cuttings were tested on micropropagation salinity tolerance of most cultivars, especially their ability to medium as described above, containing a range of NaCl lev- tolerate the higher NaC1 levels. A more credible ranldng was els including 0, 40, 80, and 120 mM (Elhag, 1991; Zhang et al., achieved by summing the cluster group rankings for each of 1993). After 4 wk, the plantlets were destructively harvested the three NaC1 levels (adding columns 2 to 4), as done by and six vegetative growth parameters were measured. The Elhag (1991) for two growth parameters (Table 1, Sum). shoot and root lengths were measured, from the point of Based on these sums, the cultivars were divided into eight emergence of the lateral bud on the original single-node cut- units, with a sum of 3 (unit 1) the most tolerant, and a sum of ting or the point of emergence of the roots, to the tip of the 10 (unit 7) the least tolerant (Table 1, Unit). The cvs. Amisk, organ, respectively. The shoot and root fresh and dry weights BelRus, Bintje, Onaway, Sierra, and Tobique were the most were measured at the time of harvest and after 60 h in a 60_+2 salt tolerant of the 130 cvs., at all levels of NaC1 (Table 1, unit C convection oven, respectively. 1) These six cultivars can be recommended for further study. 1998 KHRAIS et al.: RELATIVE SALINITY TOLERANCE 209 TABLE 1.--Relative salinity tolerance for 130 European Dundrod 3 2 2 3 7 5 and North American eultivars tested in vitro, Dundrum 2 2 2 3 7 5 Eide Russet 2 2 2 3 7 5 with Units I through 8 containing cultivars Erontestolz 2 2 2 3 7 5 with the highest to lowest salinity tolerance Gloria 1 2 3 2 7 5 levels, respectively.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us