RAPE DISCOURSES IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF TURKISH TELEVISION SERIES FATMAGÜL’ÜN SUÇU NE? A Master’s Thesis By YASEMIN YENER Department of Communication and Design İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara January 2013 To my family… RAPE DISCOURSES IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF TURKISH TELEVISION SERIES FATMAGÜL’ÜN SUÇU NE? Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by YASEMIN YENER In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION AND DESIGN IHSAN DOĞRAMACI BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA January 2013 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication and Design. Assist. Prof. Ahmet Gürata Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication and Design. Assist. Prof. Dr. Ersan Ocak Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication and Design. Assist. Prof. Dr. Dilek Kaya Examining Committee Member Approval of the Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT RAPE DISCOURSES IN TURKEY: THE CASE OF TURKISH TELEVISION SERIES FATMAGÜL’ÜN SUÇU NE? Yener, Yasemin M.A., Department of Communication and Design Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Gürata January, 2013 The television series Fatmagül’ün Suçu Ne?, which first aired in September 2010, turned in to a phenomenon. The rape scene in the first episode was anticipated for months and after it aired, scene was talked about for very long time. In mass media, series was addressed widely. There were many different criticisms regarding the rape scene. Mainly, it was blamed for vividly representing the act of rape, thus en- couraging and rape and humiliating women in various newspaper articles. However, while doing so, newspapers employed a number of rhetoric that may be elucidated as normalization of rape discourse through concealing by deceiving and trivializing rape. In this study, newspaper articles related to Fatmagül’ün Suçu Ne? published in Zaman, Hürriyet, Posta, Radikal and Cumhuriyet newspapers are studied and eval- uated in terms of discourse they employ in order to determine rape discourses in Turkish newspapers. Key Words: Rape, Sexual Violence, Rape Myths, Rape on Television, Normaliza- tion, Discourse, Women. iii ÖZET TÜRKİYEDE TECAVÜZ SÖYLEMLERİ: TÜRK TELEVİZYON DİZİSİ FATMAGÜL’ÜN SUÇU NE? ÖRNEĞİ Yener, Yasemin Yüksek Lisans, Ekonomi ve Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Danışman: Yardımcı Doçent Doktor Ahmet Gürata Ocak, 2013 2010 yılının Eylül ayında yayınlanmaya başlayan Fatmagül’ün Suçu Ne? isimli televizyon dizisi fenomene dönüştü. Birinci bölümünde yer alan tecavüz sahnesi aylarca merakla beklendi; yayınlandıktan sonar da aynı sahne uzun zaman konuşul- du. Medyada da diziden oldukça bahsedildi. Tecavüz sahnesi hakkında pek çok farklı eleştiri yapıldı. Çeşitli gazetlerede ağırlıklı olarak tecavüzün açıkça temsil edilmesi ve tecavüzün imrendilirlmesi, kadınların küçük düşürülmesi sebepleriyle suçlandı. Fakat bu şekilde eleştirirlerken, gazeteler, üstünü örtme ve önemsizleştir- me yöntemleriyle tecavüzü normalleştirme söylemini olarak nitelendirilebilecek retoriklere başvurdular. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki tecavüz söylemlerinin belirle- mek için Fatmagül’ün Suçu Ne? dizisi hakkında Zaman, Hürriyet, Posta, Radikal ve Cumhuriyet gazetelerinde çıkan haberler, izledikleri söylemler bakımından ele alınmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Tecavüz, Cinsel Şiddet, Tecavüz Mitleri, Televizyonda Tecavüz, Normalleştirmek, Söylem, Kadın. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank Assist. Prof. Ahmet Gürata for his guidance, sup- port, and patience throughout this difficult process. Without his help, this thesis would not have achieve its goal and be as strong as it is now. I am grateful for his criticisms, advices and confidence he had in me and on my subject. I would also like to thank Assist. Prof. Dr. Dilek Kaya, Assist. Prof. Dr. Fatma Ülgen and Assist. Prof. Dr. Özlem Savaş for their support, assistance and valuable comments that have allowed me to see the subject at hand from various points of views and improve my argument. I am grateful that they have accepted to allocate time reading and evaluating my work. I am thankful to Bilkent University for giving me the chance to study and receive Master of Arts in the department of Communication and Design. I would also like to thank to my dear friends Gözde Bağcı, Canan Aylıkcı, Irem Somer, Mert Budak and Ceren Ozer for their moral support and help. Finally, I would like to thank my mother, father, dear sister and grandmother for believing in me, for their endless patience with me and for their moral support. Without their support, I would have never come this far and achieved to finish my work. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. iii ÖZET ......................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 1 1.1. Statement of Purpose ....................................................................................... 5 1.2. Methodology.................................................................................................... 7 1.3. Definition of Basic Terms ............................................................................. 11 1.3.1. Sexual Violence ...................................................................................... 11 1.3.2. Rape ........................................................................................................ 14 1.3.3. Rape Myth ............................................................................................... 17 1.4. Study Overview ............................................................................................. 20 CHAPTER 2: EVALUATION OF RAPE REPRESENTATION ON TELEVISION .................................................................................................................................. 22 2.1. Aestheticization of Violence ......................................................................... 23 2.2. Generation of Rape Plot on Earlier Television Series ................................... 25 2.2.1. Rape Reform and Feminism ................................................................... 27 vi 2.3. Rape on Turkish Television Series ................................................................ 29 CHAPTER 3: FATMAGÜL’ÜN SUÇU NE? ........................................................... 33 3.1. The Original Script ........................................................................................ 34 3.2. Rape Scene In The Movie ............................................................................. 37 3.3. Rape Scene In The Television Series ............................................................ 38 3.4. After the Rape Scene: First Ten Episodes ..................................................... 41 3.5. Rape Myths .................................................................................................... 43 3.6. Patriarchal Discourse ..................................................................................... 44 CHAPTER 4: RAPE DISCOURSES: FATMAGÜL’ÜN SUÇU NE? ON TURKISH NEWSPAPERS ........................................................................................................ 47 4.1. Sonorous Voice of Patriarchy: Silencing Rape ............................................. 48 4.1.1. Distorting Feminist Discourse: Reproducing Patriarchal Discourse ...... 49 4.1.1.1. Question of Two Feminist Rhetoric: To Represent or Not to Represent ....................................................................................................... 50 4.1.2. Encouraging Rape ................................................................................... 54 4.1.3. Conditioning Audience: You Should Complain! .................................... 60 4.2. Trivializing Rape: Sensationalizing, Fictionalizing and Commodifying Rape Representation ...................................................................................................... 65 4.2.1. Sensationalizing Rape ............................................................................. 66 4.2.1.1. Building Up To The Series: Previous On Screen Sex Scenes ......... 67 4.2.1.2. Building Up To The Series: Promoting Curiosity............................ 68 4.2.1.3. Who is Raped Better? ....................................................................... 68 4.2.2. Fictionalizing Rape ................................................................................. 70 4.2.2.1. Being Raped Just Like Fatmagül ....................................................