The Marine Arthropods of Turkey

The Marine Arthropods of Turkey

Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2014) 38: http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1405-48 The marine arthropods of Turkey 1, 1 1 2 Ahmet Kerem BAKIR *, Tuncer KATAĞAN , Halim Vedat AKER , Tahir ÖZCAN , 3 4 1 1 Murat SEZGİN , Abdullah Suat ATEŞ , Cengiz KOÇAK , Fevzi KIRKIM 1 Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey 2 Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Mustafa Kemal University, İskenderun, Hatay, Turkey 3 Faculty of Fisheries, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey 4 Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey Received: 29.05.2014 Accepted: 30.07.2014 Published Online: 00.00.2013 Printed: 00.00.2013 Abstract: This recent checklist of marine arthropods found on the coasts of Turkey represents a total of 1531 species belonging to 7 classes: Malacostraca (766 species), Maxillopoda (437 species), Ostracoda (263 species), Pycnogonida (27 species), Arachnida (26 species), Branchiopoda (7 species), and Insecta (5 species). Seventy-five species were classified as alien species in the region. This paper also includes the first record of the amphipod Melita valesi from the Levantine coast of Turkey (Kaş, Gulf of Antalya). Key words: Arthropoda, Black Sea, Sea of Marmara, Aegean Sea, Levantine Sea, Turkey 1. Introduction İzmir Bay (Smirnæ) and the Bosphorus (Constantinopoli). The arthropods, containing approximately 1.2 million Forskål died of malaria in July 1763 and Carsten Niebuhr described species and constituting almost 80% of all edited and published the work of his friend in 1775. In described living animal species, constitute the largest the 19th century, Ostroumoff (1896) participated in the and most successful of the animal phyla. The phylum Selanik expedition on the invitation of the Ottoman Sultan Arthropoda is commonly divided into 4 subphyla of Abdul Hamid II, who showed interest in the scientific extant forms: Chelicerata, Crustacea, Hexapoda, and investigations in the Sea of Marmara. He reported over 50 Myriapoda (Pisani, 2009). Although Chelicerata and crustacean species in the area. The other studies performed Hexapoda contain mostly terrestrial species, crustaceans on marine arthropods in the Sea of Marmara were made are primarily adapted to aquatic life. by Heller (1863), Colombo (1885), Sowinsky (1897), and The first taxonomic studies on arthropod species along Marion (1898) in the 19th century. During the first half of the Turkish coasts began in the 18th century. Hasselquist the 20th century, researchers who made main contributions (1757) visited some parts of Asia Minor (Anatolia), Egypt, to the understanding of the diversity of marine arthropods Cyprus, and Palestine and died in İzmir (Smyrna) on his were Thompson (1912), Colosi (1922), Ninni (1923), return home. His large collection, notes, and letters to Stephensen (1923), Gruvel (1928), Monod (1930, 1931), Linnaeus were published in 1757. In one of these letters, and Neu (1939). In the second half of the 20th century, there Astacus minimus (as a Cancri species) was mentioned by has been a significant increase in the number of scientific him in a Pinna species in İzmir Bay. According to Holthuis studies on arthropods along the coasts of Turkey. The first (1961), this species refers to Pontonia pinnophylax (Otto, and most comprehensive study was performed by Demir 1821), which is the first known record of a crustacean (1952) in the Sea of Marmara, who recorded a total of 113 from the Turkish coasts. The other investigation was made arthropod species (107 crustaceans and 6 pycnogonids). by Forskål (1775), who was appointed with Linnaeus’s Afterwards, numerous studies were carried out by native approval by King Frederick V of Denmark to an expedition and foreign researchers, such as Tortonese (1959), Caspers to Arabia with his friend Carsten Niebuhr. He collected and (1968), Geldiay and Kocataş (1972a, 1972b), Pınar (1974), reported some crustacean species [Melicertus kerathurus Kocataş (1976a, 1976b, 1976c); Kocataş and Katağan (1978); (as Cancer kerathurus), Eriphia verrucosa (as Cancer Kocataş (1981a, 1981b), Balkıs and Albayrak (1994), Krapp- verrucosus), Liocarcinus corrugatus (as Cancer pellitus), and Schickel (1994), Öztürk (1998), Sezgin et al. (2001), Balkıs Nepinnotheres pinnotheres (as Cancer pinnotheres)] from et al. (2002), Uysal A et al. (2002), Uysal Z et al. (2002), * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 BAKIR et al. / Turk J Zool Sezgin (2003), Yurdabak (2004), Çınar et al. (2006), Ateş 2. Materials and methods et al. (2010), Aslan-Cihangir and Pancucci-Papadopoulou In this study, previously published papers and some (2011a, 2011b), Bakır (2012), Bakır and Çevirgen (2012), unpublished data on arthropod species from the Turkish Çınar et al. (2012a, 2012b), Pešić et al. (2014), Bakır and coasts have been taken into account. The checklist contains Katağan (2014), and Gönülal et al. (2014). In addition to the valid names of the native and alien species with their these studies, Kocataş et al. (2000) compiled all reported first records in the Turkish seas as well as their depth ranges arthropod species along the coasts of Turkey and recorded and habitat preferences in the region (Table 1). Species 901 species in the region. with uncertain records or validity have not been included So far, over 300 papers regarding marine arthropods in the main list, but they are listed with the reasons for have been published from the region, which constitutes rejection in Table 2. The references marked with “+” are important knowledge. However, the high number subsequent records of that species. The timeline of the first of publications also makes it difficult to access this records according to years and the species distribution in information. To overcome this problem, all reported the Turkish seas are given. The Turkish coasts have been marine arthropod species of Turkey were combined herein divided into squares (15 × 15 km) in ArcGIS 9.3 software. in a single checklist while reducing the misidentifications The natural-breaks method was used to point out the areas and synonyms as much as possible. with the highest number of species. Table 1. Checklist of marine arthropods of Turkey *: Alien species; +: key reference; BS: Black Sea; SM: Sea of Marmara; AS: Aegean Sea; LS: Levantine Sea; DR: depth range (I: 0–10 m; II: 11–50 m; III: 51–100 m; IV: 101–200 m; V: 201–400 m; VI: 401–600 m; VII: >600 m); H: habitat (Hs: hard substratum including algae, sponge, mussels, etc.; Ss: soft substratum including all phanerogames; P: pelagic; Pz: parasite; CT: commensal on sea turtles, CM: commensal on Maja spp., W: inhabiting submerged wood); PS: present study. Group/species BS SM AS LS DR H ARTHROPODA (Phylum) CHELICERATA (Subphylum) ARACHNIDA (Class) ACARINA (Subclass) Bilecenoğlu et al., Agaue chevreuxi Trouessart, 1889 Bartsch, 2004 - - I Ss 2013 Agauopsis brevipalpus (Trouessart, 1889) Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs, Ss Anomalohalacarus similis Bartsch, 1976 Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Ss Camactognathus tesselatus (Morselli and Mari, 1982) Bartsch, 2013 - - - I Ss Copidognathus brachystomus Viets, 1940 +Bartsch, 2004 - - - I–II Hs, Ss Copidognathus dissimilis Bartsch, 2013 Bartsch, 2013 - - - I Ss Copidognathus magnipalpus (Police, 1909) +Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs, Ss Copidognathus mucronatus Viets, 1928 +Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Copidognathus sculptus (Police, 1909) Bartsch, 2013 - - - I–II Ss Copidognathus tabellio (Trouessart, 1894) +Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Copidognathus tectiporus (Viets, 1935) +Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Ss Halacaropsis hirsuta (Trouessart, 1889) - Durucan, 2013 - - I Hs Isobactrus ponticus Bartsch, 2000 +Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Thessalou-Legaki et Litarachna divergens Walter, 1925 - - - I Hs al., 2012 Lohmannella falcata (Hodge, 1863) Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs, Ss Pontarachna adriatica Morselli, 1980 Pešić et al., 2013 - - - I Ss Pontarachna episce Smith, 2008 - - - Smith, 2008 I–II ? Pontarachna valkanovi Petrova, 1978 Pešić et al., 2013 - - - I Ss Porohalacarus alpinus (Thor, 1910) +Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs, Ss 2 BAKIR et al. / Turk J Zool Table 1. (Continued). Rhombognathides pascens (Lohmann, 1889) Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Rhombognathus karlvietsi Bartsch, 1975 Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Rhombognathus magnirostris Trouessart, 1889 Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Rhombognathus paranotops Bartsch, 1986 Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Rhombognathus peltatus Viets, 1939 Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Rhombognathus tonops Bartsch, 1996 Bartsch, 2004 - - - I Hs Thalassarachna affinis (Trouessart, 1896) Bartsch, 2004 Kapiris et al., 2014 - - I–IV Hs, Ss PYCNOGONIDA (Class) PANTOPODA (Order) Achelia echinata Hodge, 1864 - Demir, 1952 Arnaud, 1976 - I Hs Koçak and Katağan, Achelia langi (Dohrn, 1881) - - - I–II Hs, Ss 2007a Achelia vulgaris (O. G. Costa, 1861) - - Koçak et al., 2010a - II Hs Koçak and Alan, Ammothella appendiculata (Dohrn, 1881) - Demir, 1952 Krapp et al., 2008 I Hs 2013 Ammothella biunguiculata (Dohrn, 1881) - - Koçak et al., 2010a - II Ss Ammothella longioculata (Faraggiana, 1940) - - Krapp et al., 2008 - I Hs Koçak and Alan, Ammothella longipes (Hodge, 1864) - - Arnaud, 1976 I Hs 2013 Ammothella uniunguiculata (Dohrn, 1881) - - Arnaud, 1976 - I Hs Anoplodactylus angulatus (Dohrn, 1881) - - Krapp et al., 2008 - I Hs Anoplodactylus californicus Hall, 1912 - - - Stock, 1962 ? Hs Anoplodactylus digitatus (Böhm, 1879) - - Koçak, 2014 - I Hs Anoplodactylus nanus Krapp, Koçak and Katağan, 2008 - - Krapp et al., 2008 - I Hs Anoplodactylus petiolatus (Kroyer,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    67 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us