SOME PROGRESS in CONFORMAL GEOMETRY Sun-Yung A. Chang, Jie Qing and Paul Yang Dedicated to the Memory of Thomas Branson 1. Confo

SOME PROGRESS IN CONFORMAL GEOMETRY Sun-Yung A. Chang, Jie Qing and Paul Yang Dedicated to the memory of Thomas Branson Abstract. In this paper we describe our current research in the theory of partial differential equations in conformal geometry. We introduce a bubble tree structure to study the degeneration of a class of Yamabe metrics on Bach flat manifolds satisfying some global conformal bounds on compact manifolds of dimension 4. As applications, we establish a gap theorem, a finiteness theorem for diffeomorphism type for this class, and diameter bound of the σ2-metrics in a class of conformal 4-manifolds. For conformally compact Einstein metrics we introduce an eigenfunction compactification. As a consequence we obtain some topological constraints in terms of renormalized volumes. 1. Conformal Gap and finiteness Theorem for a class of closed 4-manifolds 1.1 Introduction Suppose that (M4, g) is a closed 4-manifold. It follows from the positive mass theorem that, for a 4-manifold with positive Yamabe constant, Zσ2dv ≤ 16π2 Mand equality holds if and only if (M4, g) is conformally equivalent to the standard 4-sphere, where <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">1</li></ul>2σ2[g] = R2 − |E| , <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">24 </li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>R is the scalar curvature of g and E is the traceless Ricci curvature of g. This is an interesting fact in conformal geometry because the above integral is a conformal invariant like the Yamabe constant. Typeset by A S-T X M E 1<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">2</li><li style="flex:1">CONFORMAL GEOMETRY </li></ul>One may ask, whether there is a constant ꢀ0 > 0 such that a closed 4-manifold M4 has to be diffeomorphic to S4 if it admits a metric g with positive Yamabe constant and Zσ2[g]dvg ≥ (1 − ꢀ)16π2. Mfor some ꢀ < ꢀ0? Notice that here the Yamabe invariant for such [g] is automatically close to that for the round 4-sphere. There is an analogous gap theorem of Bray and Neves for Yamabe invariant in dimension 3 [BN]. One cannot expect the Yamabe invariant alone to isolate the sphere, and it is more plausible to consider the integral of σ2. We will answer the question affirmatively in the class of Bach flat 4-manifolds. Recall that Riemann curvature tensor decomposes into Rijkl = Wijkl + (Aikgjl − Ailgjk − Ajkgil + Ajlgik), in dimension 4, where Wijkl is the Weyl curvature, <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">1</li></ul>Aij = (Rij − Rgij) <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">2</li><li style="flex:1">6</li></ul>is Weyl-Schouten curvature tensor and Rij is the Ricci curvature tensor. Also recall that the Bach tensor is 1Bij = Wkijl,lk + RklWkijl .2 We say that a metric g is Bach flat if Bij = 0. Bach flat metrics are critical metrics 2Rfor the functional M |W| dv. Bach flatness is conformally invariant in dimension 4. It follows from Chern-Gauss-Bonnet, Z28π2χ(M4) = (σ2 + |W| )dv, MRthat M σ2dv is conformally invariant. The gap theorem is as follows: Theorem 1.1.1. Suppose that (M4, [g]) is a Bach flat closed 4-manifold with positive Yamabe constant and that Z2(|W| dv)[g] ≤ Λ0. Mfor some fixed positive number Λ0. Then there is a positive number ꢀ0 > 0 such that, if Zσ2[g]dvg ≥ (1 − ꢀ)16π2 M<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">CHANG, QING AND YANG </li><li style="flex:1">3</li></ul>holds for some constant ꢀ < ꢀ0, then (M4, [g]) is conformally equivalent to the standard 4-sphere. Our approach is based on the recent work on the compactness of Bach flat metrics on 4-manifolds of Tian and Viaclovsky [TV1][TV2], and of Anderson [An]. Indeed our work relies on a more precise understanding of the bubbling process near points of curvature concentration. For that purpose we develop the bubble tree structure in a sequence of metrics that describes precisely the concentration of curvature. Our method to develop bubble tree structure is inspired by the work of Anderson and Cheeger [AC] on the bubble tree configurations of the degenerations of metrics of bounded Ricci curvature. Our construction is modeled after this work but differs in the way that our bubble tree is built from the bubbles at points with the smallest scale of concentration to bubbles with larger scale; while the bubble tree in [AC] is constructed from bubbles of large scale to bubbles with smaller scales. The inductive method of construction of our bubble tree is modeled on earlier work of [BC], [Q] and [St] on the study of concentrations of energies in harmonic maps and the scalar curvature equations. As a consequence of the bubble tree construction we are able to obtain the following finite diffeomorphism theorem: Theorem 1.1.2. Suppose that A is a collection of Bach flat Riemannian manifolds (M4, g) with positive Yamabe constant, satisfying Z2(|W| dv)[g] ≤ Λ0, Mfor some fixed positive number Λ0, and Z(σ2dv)[g] ≥ σ0, Mfor some fixed positive number σ0. Then there are only finite many diffeomorphism types in A. It is known that in each conformal class of metrics belonging to the family A, there is a metric g¯ = e2wg such that σ2(Ag¯) = 1, which we shall call the σ2 metric. The bubble tree structure in the degeneration of Yamabe metrics in A is also helpful to understand the behavior of the σ2-metrics in A. For example: Theorem 1.1.3. For the conformal classes [g0] ∈ A the conformal metrics g = e2wg0 satisfying the equation σ2(g) = 1 has a uniform bound for the diameter. 1.2 The Neck Theorem <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">4</li><li style="flex:1">CONFORMAL GEOMETRY </li></ul>The main tool we need to develop the bubble tree picture is the neck theorem which should be compared with the neck theorem in the work of Anderson and Cheeger [AC]. Due to the lack of point-wise bounds on Ricci curvature, our version of the neck theorem will have weaker conclusion. But it is sufficient to allow us to construct the bubble tree at each point of curvature concentration. Let (M4, g) be a Riemannian manifold. For a point p ∈ M, denote by Br(p) the geodesic ball with radius r centered at p, Sr(p) the geodesic sphere of radius r centered at p. Consider the geodesic annulus centered at p: ¯Ar ,r (p) = {q ∈ M : r1 ≤ dist(q, p) ≤ r2}. In general, Ar ,r (p) may have more than one connected components. We will consider any one component <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>¯<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>¯Ar ,r (p) ⊂ Ar1, r2(p) <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>that meets the geodesic sphere of radius r2: \Ar ,r (p) Sr (p) = ∅ Let H3(Sr(p)) be the 3D-Hausdorff measure of the geodesic sphere Sr(p). <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>Theoerm 1.2.1. Suppose (M4, g) is a Bach flat and simply connected 4-manifold with a Yamabe metric of positive Yamabe constant. Let p ∈ M, α ∈ (0, 1), ꢀ > 0, v1 > 0, and a < dist(p, ∂M). Then there exist positive numbers δ0, c2, n depending on ꢀ, α, Cs, v1, a such that the following holds. Let Ar ,r (p) be a connected compo- <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>nent of the geodesic annulus in M such that <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">r2 ≤ c2a, </li><li style="flex:1">r1 ≤ δ0r2, </li></ul>H3(Sr(p)) ≤ v1r3, ∀r ∈ [r1, 100r1], and Z2|Rm| dv ≤ δ0. Ar 2 (p) ,r 1Then Ar ,r (p) is the only such component. In addition, for the only component <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>14 1<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">A</li><li style="flex:1">(p), </li></ul>(δ0− −ꢀ)r1,(δ 4 +ꢀ)r2 0(p), there exist some Γ ⊂ O(4), acting freely on S3, 1which intersects with S (δ04 +ꢀ)r2 with |Γ| ≤ n, and an quasi isometry ψ, with <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">1</li></ul>A(p) (δ0− 4 +ꢀ)r1,(δ 4 −ꢀ)r2 0<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">CHANG, QING AND YANG </li><li style="flex:1">5</li></ul>(S3/Γ)) <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">1</li></ul>⊂ Ψ(C δ0− 4 r1,δ04 r2 14 1⊂ A (p) (δ0− −ꢀ)r1,(δ 4 +ꢀ)r2 0such that for all C r,r(S3/Γ) ⊂ C has (S3/Γ), in the cone coordinates, one 12<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">1</li></ul>δ0− 4 r1,δ04 r2 |(Ψ∗(r−2g))ij − δij|C ≤ ꢀ. 1,α The first step in the proof is to use the Sobolev inequality to show the uniqueness of the connected annulus Ar ,r (p). The second step is to establish the growth of volume of geodesic spheres <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul>H3(Sr(p) ≤ Cr3 for all r ∈ [r1, 12 r2]. Here we rely on the work of Tian and Viaclovsky [TV1] [TV2] where they analyzed the end structure of a Bach-flat, scalar flat manifolds with finite L2 total curvature. The last step is to use the Gromov and Cheeger compactness argument as in the work of Anderson and Cheeger [AC] to get the cone structure of the neck. 1.3 Bubble tree construction In this section we attempt to give a clear picture about what happen at curvature concentration points. We will detect and extract bubbles by locating the centers and scales of curvature concentration. We will assume here that (Mi, gi) are Bach flat 4-manifolds with positive scalar curvature Yamabe metrics, vanishing first homology, and finite L2 total curvature. Choose δ small enough according to the ꢀ-estimates and the neck Theorem in the previous section. Suppose that Xi ⊂ Mi contains a geodesic ball of a fixed radius r0 and Zδ |Rmi|2dvi ≤ , 2Tη0 (∂Xi) where Tη (∂Xi) = {p ∈ Mi : dist(p, ∂Xi) < η0}, 0for some fixed positive number 4η0 < r0. Define, for p ∈ Xi, Zδs1i (p) = r such that |Rmi|2dvi = . 2Bri (p) Let p1i = p such that si1(p) = inf s1i (p). Bti0 (pi) <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">6</li><li style="flex:1">CONFORMAL GEOMETRY </li></ul>We may assume λ1i = si1(p1i ) → 0, for otherwise there would be no curvature concentration in Xi. We then conclude that (Mi, (λ1i )−2gi, pi1) converges to (M∞1 , g∞1 , p∞1 ), which is a Bach flat, scalar flat, complete 4-manifold satisfying the Sobolev inequality, having finite L2 total curvature, and one single end. Definition 1.3.1. We call a Bach flat, scalar flat, complete 4-manifold with the Sobolev inequality, finite L2 total curvature, and a single ALE end a leaf bubble, while we will call such space with finitely many isolated irreducible orbifold points an intermediate bubble. Now, we define, for p ∈ Xi \ Bi 1 (pi1), K1λi s2i (p) = r such that Zδ |Rmi|2dvi = . 2Bri (p)\Bi 1 (p1i ) i1<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">K</li><li style="flex:1">λ</li></ul>Let p2i = p such that <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">s2i (p) = </li><li style="flex:1">inf </li></ul>Ks2i (p). Bri (p)\Bi 1 (p1i ) i1λAgain let λ2i = si2(p2i ) → 0. Otherwise there would be no more curvature concentration. Then Lemma 1.3.2. λi2 λi1 dist(p1i , p2i ) +→ ∞. λi1 There are two possibilities: dist(p1i , p2i ) Case 1. Case 2. → ∞ λi2 dist(p1i , p2i ) λi2 ≤ M1. In case 1, we certainly also have dist(p1i , p2i ) → ∞. λi1 <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">CHANG, QING AND YANG </li><li style="flex:1">7</li></ul>Therefore, in the convergence of the sequence (Mi, (λ2i )−2gi, pi2) the concentration which produces the bubble (M∞1 , g∞1 ) eventually escapes to infinity of M∞2 and hence is not visible to the bubble (M∞2 , g∞2 ), likewise, in the converging sequence (Mi, (λi1)−2gi, p1i ) one does not see the concentration which produces (M∞2 , g∞2 ). There are at most finite number of such leaf bubbles. Definition 1.3.3. We say two bubbles (M∞j1 , g∞j1 ) and (M∞j2 , g∞j2 ) associated with (pji1 , λji1 ) and (pij2 , λji2 ) are separable if

SOME PROGRESS in CONFORMAL GEOMETRY Sun-Yung A. Chang, Jie Qing and Paul Yang Dedicated to the Memory of Thomas Branson 1. Confo

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support