82°E The CEPF Niche for Investment 80°E The CEPF niche for investment in the Eastern Targets at the species level are those that are contribution to biodiversity conservation, WWF-US The CEPF niche and strategic funding directions in Himalayas region has been formulated through an globally threatened (Critically Endangered, further analyzed these targets to identify priorities for the Eastern Himalayas region are based on the inclusive, participatory process that engaged civil Endangered and Vulnerable) according to the IUCN CEPF investment based on input from additional prioritized conservation outcomes; an urgency to 96°E 30°N society, donor and government stakeholders Red List. Recognizing that most species are best expert consultations, literature and donor portfolio abate threats to biodiversity; socioeconomic throughout the region. The process was led by conserved by safeguarding the habitats where they reviews, and results from previous conservation realities; institutional capacity of civil society in the 30°N World Wildlife Fund-US in collaboration with occur, "Key Biodiversity Areas" are identified as priority-setting exercises for the Eastern Himalayas region; and an assessment of current investments, 30°N BirdLife International-Indochina, Centre for targets for achieving conservation at the site level. region. funding gaps and opportunities in the region as 30°N Environmental Education and the Ashoka Trust for Key Biodiversity Areas are identified based on the detailed in the ecosystem profile. Research in Ecology and Environment. Regional presence of species for which site-scale conservation Of the 163 species outcomes, 19 mammals, 28 expert roundtables were held in Nepal, Sikkim, is necessary: globally threatened species, birds, 17 reptiles and 12 amphibians were selected Government institutions and civil society are active Bhutan and Assam. The roundtables were restricted-range species and globally significant as priorities for CEPF investment. The plant species in conservation in the region, but often lack C H I N A attended by 147 participants representing various congregations. To ensure persistence of threatened were not included as priority species because of coordinated action and capacity to implement institutions that included a range of local, regional, species and Key Biodiversity Areas, Biodiversity lack of information about their needed conservation biodiversity programs. CEPF’s mission in this region and international civil society organizations and Conservation Corridors are identified as targets for actions; however, re-assessing the conservation will be to build on existing programs to strengthen 84°E scientific and government institutions. Consultants landscape-scale conservation, based on areas status of the region’s plants is a priority. Based on the role of communities in biodiversity conservation. were also hired to collect, collate and prepare required to conserve broad-scale ecological and the priority species, 60 sites and 5 landscapes were See the ecosystem profile for a full listing of the background reports on socioeconomic factors, the evolutionary processes and for the conservation of also prioritized. In the five priority corridors are: strategic directions. institutional context and conservation efforts in wide-ranging species, low densities or migratory Terai Arc Landscape, the Bhutan Biological Nepal, Bhutan and northeast India. behavior. Conservation Complex, the Kangchenjunga- For more information, visit www.cepf.net. Dibang Valley Singalila Complex, the Kaziranga-Karbi Anlong 94°E The Eastern Himalayas ecosystem profile includes a In the Eastern Himalayas, the full set of targets for Landscape, and the North Bank Landscape. The Royal Sukla Phanta commitment and emphasis on using targets for conservation outcomes was defined in a consultative prioritization methodology and full listings of achieving "conservation outcomes" as the scientific process led by BirdLife International - Indochina species, site and corridor outcomes can be found underpinning for determining CEPF's geographic using a data-driven process and standardized in the ecosystem profile. Technical support for this DIBANG-DIHANG s Ghodaghodi Lake and thematic focus for investment. These outcomes criteria. In total, 163 globally threatened species, 175 process was provided by the Center for Applied Tato, Machuka, Moni Gong comprise the effective conservation of a set of Key Biodiversity Areas, and 13 Biodiversity Biodiversity Science (CABS) at Conservation Annapurna and Gasheng species, sites, and landscapes, which is essential for Conservation Corridors were identified as International. preventing biodiversity loss. conservation targets. To maximize CEPF’s a Mouling Sirkum Pahar Royal Manasulu y Bardia 90°E Walong 86°E Para-Changlagaum Khairapur Nacho, Limeking, Taksing and Majha Upper Renging Mehao Ditchu a 92°E 28°N Nepalganj Langtang 28°N Dang Deukhuri Foothills 88°E Upper Rottung l D'Ering UPPER LOHIT- CHANGLANG TERAI ARC Sagarmatha Jigme Dorji a Jagdispur Reservoir 80°E Shivapuri Kolo Riang, Sarli and Damin Shivapur Forest B H U T A N Dum Duma- Barandabhar BUMDELLING-TAWANG Dangori-Kumsong Kathmandu Bumdelling wa Gainda Tal Lumbini Area (incl. Bumthang Menji Tally Valley ho Phulchowki Mountain Zamithang, Mago-Thingbu and Luguthang aik Rupandehli, Kapil Vastu Makalu-Barun ICAL CO NSERVATION COMPLE Wetlands Wetlands -S Upper Dihing (east) Kanchenjunga IOLOG X Nelya and bru and Nawal Parashi) AN B Di and Kakojan 82°E T u Sageshwar Lake Thungri Changlang NORTH BANK Namdapha and Kamlang m U h Chayang Tajo and Khenewa Lada H gc Popjika and Poshingla, Maji, Royal Chitwan B n Jamjing and Bherajan-Borajan- sa Khatekha Valleys Basti and Liak Thimphu Dochu T Podumoni Burhi-Dihing Sengagan i Wetlands La a un Tshangkha T Sangti Valley Bardoibam-Bilmukh Toorsa Chele La Thimphu e-P hru Parsa Tamur ak mshin La Kori La a L Jigme Singye g Mandla Upper Dihing (west), Namtok, Namheik, Valley Ad Khanglung Phudung Paro Wetlands Wangchuk Sakteng Koabari Doloni Joypur and Dirak Nampong and Manmao Wetlands Itanagar Pani-Dihing H Namsang Mukh Roster of Biodiversity Conservation Corridors KANGCHENJUNGA- BHUTAN BIOLOGICAL Pakke and Vodoria *denotes priority CONSERVATION COMPLEX SINGALILA Thimsing La Eagle's Nest N E P A L Nameri Misamari Beel-Kokliamukh- 96°E WESTERN BHUTAN Royal and Sessa Sibsagar Township * Bhutan Biological Conservation Complex Samtse Deothang-Narphang- laojan-Dalani-Kawimari Complex JOYPUR-JOYDIHING 84°E SUBTROPICAL FORESTS lephu Manas Khaling-Neoli Bumdelling-Tawang -Ge Fo Samdrup Jongkhar ng ot Dibang-Dihang ha hil Sonai Rupai Kamji arb ls n Joypur-Joydihing S a tr Gibbon (Hollongapar) Kangchenjunga-Singalila Dharan Forests Phipsoo u * Buxa as Barnadi ap Kaziranga-Karbi Anlong Ma n Bra h m Kaziranga * MANAS-BUXA Orang r Manas-Buxa G East and North a Koshi Tappu Gorumara Ripu-Chirang Neora Valley-Toorsa n see inset Karbi Anlong d a * North Bank G h k Jaldapara Majuli a g Burachapori Shiloi * Terai Arc h a Chakrasila and and Laokhowa e r Upper Lohit-Changlang a Diplai-Dakra-Dhir Botha Beel Manaha Garampani and Nambor West Bhutan Subtropical Forests Tirap-Paktai i Beel Complex Complex Nagaon Township NG s Tamarang-Konora- KAZIRA A-KARB and Namphai t I AN o Paropota-Doloni Complex LON K Jengdia Beel and Satgaon G Deobali Jalah t Satsatoi Range Conservation Outcomes p Gauhati a s S Sareswar Pobitora Dipor Beel 26°N Eastern Himalayas Beel 26°N Urpod Beel Fakim and 25 0 25 50 75 100 Nongkhyllem Sharamati a I N D I A kilometers Macaque Chand Dubi Beel Lumding sanctuary Kohima Tiyi Peak scale: 1/1,750,000 an 88°E Garampani Nongkhlaw projection: Albers Equal Area Conic a G ge Intanki, Maratlongri E g s 86°E central meridian: 89° east longitude an and Dhansiri Puliebadze G Shillong Khonoma standard parallels: 23.5° & 28° north latitude Rongrengiri Khasi Hills (incl. Tura-Nokrek hotspot boundary Saipung and Narpuh Shillong Peak) Range Kisa Siju I N D I A Ango Hills Baghmara Cherapunjee Cliffs, Roster of Key Biodiversity Areas Pitcher Balaphakram Gorges and Sacred Groves * denotes Priority Plant (incl. Mawsmai) Jatinga TERAI ARC CEPF priority corridor NEPAL 63 Bunning *121 Mouling • Barail and North Cachar * 1 Annapurna 64 Burachapori and Laokhowa 122 Murlen Siro i 2 Barandabhar 65 Burhi-Dihing 123 Nacho, Limeking, Taksing and MANAS-BUXA other biodiversity conservation corridor * 3 Dang Deukhuri Foothills * 66 Buxa Majha 4 Dharan Forests 67 Chakrasila and Diplai-Dakra-Dhir 124 Nagaon Township 90°E Imphal * 5 Gainda Tal Beel Complex *125 Namdapha and Kamlang Barak River 6 Ghodaghodi Lake 68 Chand Dubi beel *126 Nameri Dzuko Key Biodiversity Area, CEPF Priority 7 Jagdishpur Reservoir 69 Chapramari 127 Namsang Mukh and Vodoria Son Beel Bunning * 8 Kanchenjunga 70 Chayang Tajo and Khenewa Lada 128 Namtok, Namheik, Nampong Dzuko 9 Khairapur 71 Cherapunjee Cliffs, Gorges and and Manmao * Keibul Lamjao (incl. Loktak, s 10 Koshi Tappu Sacred Groves (incl. Mawsmai) 129 Neora Valley (incl. Lava) Barak, Inner Line Kailam * Phumlem, Kharung and Ikop Lakes) Langtang Key Biodiversity Area, Other 11 Langtang 72 Chholhamo Plateau 130 Ngengpui and Kathakal 12 Lower Mai Valley Forests 73 D'Ering 131 Nongkhlaw * Yangoupokpi Lokchao 13 Lumbini Area (incl. Rupandehli, Kapil 74 Dampa 132 Nongkhyllem e Vastu and Nawal Parashi) 75 Deobali Jalah 133 Orang † * B A N G L A D E S H protected area (extent, geographic extent pending) * 14 Makalu-Barun * 76 Dibang Valley *134 Pakke 15 Manaslu * 77 Dibru-Saikhowa 135 Palak Lake * 16 Parsa 78 Dipor