Shuttle Ground Turnaround Operations

Shuttle Ground Turnaround Operations

1974 (11th) Vol.1 Technology Today for The Space Congress® Proceedings Tomorrow Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Shuttle Ground Turnaround Operations Robert H. Buckley Shuttle Turnaround Ground Operations Manager NASA/John F. Kennedy Space Center Kennedy Space, Center, FL 32899 Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Buckley, Robert H., "Shuttle Ground Turnaround Operations" (1974). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 1. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1974-11th-v1/session-6/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHUTTLE GROUND TURNAROUND OPERATIONS Robert H. Buckley Shuttle Turnaround Ground Operations Manager NASA/John F. Kennedy Space Center Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899 ABSTRACT The Space Shuttle is the first manned program requiring systems to have "reusability" built This paper will primarily address and define for within. The qround checkout philosophy utilized the Shuttle Vehicle elements; the basic aspects during previous programs, resultina in long check­ of ground turnaround operations being developed out dwell times, but as history records, the by the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The current operations were very successful. Six months at baseline approach to ground operations will be KSC was not uncommon for manned vehicle checkout outlined including a discussion of the planned operations. turnaround evolution from the Development Phase of the Program to the Operational Phase. Typical To achieve a Shuttle turnaround of two weeks will turnaround activities for each element; e.g., indeed require new innovative and creative ideas Orbiter, External Tank, Solid Rocket Booster, for ground operations, in addition to a flight will be described and will include the integra­ and ground hardware design conducive to oper- tion of the elements up to launch. A brief ability and serviceability. description of the major KSC facilities will be included for clarification of the turnaround process. SHUTTLE APPROACH TO GROUND OPERATIONS To achieve the requirement of a two-week turn­ INTRODUCTION around for the Shuttle vehicle during the Oper­ ational Phase, an approach to qround operations For the past four years Kennedy Space Center has been selected that implements proven tech­ (KSC) has been actively participating in the niques and reduces system level checkout as per­ development of the Space Shuttle Program. A formance confidence is achieved. Flight hardware typical Space Shuttle mission profile is shown performance data baselines will be established in Figure 1 for reference. The KSC contributions during factory and vendor checkout, development have been in many different areas; however, one tests, and the vertical flight test phase at of KSC's most significant contribution has been KSC. The performance data and information base­ in the development and definition of the Ground lines, as used within this paper, are considered Turnaround Operational concepts and philosophies to include timelines, techniques, routines, pro­ that will be required to achieve the Program cedures, and software used during the qround Objectives. operations turnaround. The objective to recycle the flight vehicle to a This baseline will be updated on each succeed!no launch configuration in two weeks and maintain turnaround until the operational baseline is a launch program that is cost effective is a con­ attained. This is estimated to be after approxi­ tinuing challenge. Previous manned programs such mately six (6) flights from the KSC launch site. as Mercury, Gemini, Apollo and Skylab had program goals that required rigorously exacting ground As experience and confidence are gained and operational techniques and methods. Complete system/vehicle performance, data accumulated, and thorough checkout of the entire space vehicle redundant checkout (repetitive testing) will be was the norm. Since there was, relatively eliminated, subsystem level checkout will be speaking, little baseline data available on com­ reduced if not totally eliminated, and the level plex and intricate systems, it was necessary to of of inspection will be optimized. Ultimately, exercise each and every system repeatedly. the qround operations goal* is to utilize the Sufficient data and information on a given maximum amount of data and information from the system and "black box" was imperative to give previous flight during the turnaround, relying on the engineering and management team absolute broad "end-to-end" tests and "go/no-go" type data confidence for a mission commit. The hardware for flight readiness. design for these programs did not contain the operational features that made such demands The ground turnaround approach is basically one quick and easy; but then again, it was not in­ of building blocks. This approach provides for tended to be. Each system was designed to per­ the early turnaround operations (first fliahts) form and function for one mission and one mission to include detailed inspections of hardware only. systems, and systematic checkout of avionics and fluid mechanical systems. The initial process- 6-1 ing of the Shuttle System at KSC is planned to be hazardous payload safe. These tasks include approximately six-(6) months, connection to facility power, facility ground coolant, and Launch Processing System (IPS), The first Vertical Flight Operations Flow Includes positioning of access stands, installation of a Flight Readiness Firing of the main engines engine gimbal locks and engine covers, removal of which is unique only to the first flow. Subse­ access panels, and safing of any unexpended quent turnarounds will reduce testing and oper­ ordnance. Hazardous payioads will be removed ations in an evolutionary manner until the two- during safing operations. week ground turnaround goal is achieved as shown in Figure 2. It should also be noted that during After drain, vent, and purge lines are connected, the course of the Vertical Flight Test Phase, the fuel cell tanks will be drained and purged. incremental demonstrations of operational turn­ High-pressure gases will be vented from the pro­ around capabilities will be accomplished to pulsion and the Environmental Control Life Support verify that the vehicle hardware, ground support System (ECLSS) systems. The hyperqolic systems equipment, procedures and operational techniques will be drained of excess propel!ants, and the can support the achievement of the two-week goal. interface connections, along with the Main Pro­ pulsion System (MPS), will be purged. At the completion of these deservicing/safing operations, OPERATIONAL TURNAROUND the Reaction Control System (RCS) and Orbital Maneuvering System (QMS) modules will be removed Ground operation processing of the Shuttle and will be transported to the Hypergolic Main­ elements are performed in parallel prior to mating tenance Facility. and obtaining a launch configuration. The Logic Flow Chart shown in Figure 3 represents the Following the safing operations, a visual in­ simultaneous Shuttle element processing for launch spection of the Thermal Protection System (TPS), readiness. selected structure, landinq gear, tires, etc., will be made to determine if any damaae was sus­ Safing of the Orbiter after landing is the first tained during flight or landina. In addition, a phase of the ground turnaround cycle. The Orbiter system performance review will be conducted to configuration in Figure 4 and the Shuttle Vehicle evaluate all previous data, inspection reports, Configuration in Figure 5 are shown for reference onboard flight data, and pilot reports to deter­ only. The landing phase begins when communi­ mine fixes, chanaes, and special verifications cations are established with the Orbiter at the required to ready the Orbiter for launch. point of post blackout, and continues through the Anomaltes discovered during inspection and the Terminal Area Energy Management (TAEM), autoland, system performance review will be scheduled for and rollout phases. The point of post blackout correction during the maintenance period. will occur at an altitude of approximately 160,000 feet and a range of approximately 140 nautical A maintenance and checkout effort will be per­ miles. Control of the flight from this point will formed to. prepare the Orbiter for subsequent be supported using facilities at the landing site. mating and prelaunch operations. Scheduled main­ Orbiter independent position updates will be tenance to perform programmed component/system supplied by ground tracking systems. These up­ changeout, thermal protection system refurbishment, dates will enable ground controllers to assist modification, etc., as well as corrective main­ the Orbiter flight crew to successfully negotiate tenance to correct those anomalies determined the post blackout and TAEM phases. Once final from inspections and fault isolation will be made approach begins at glideslope interception, ex­ during this operation. Refurbished flight com­ ternal control of the Orbiter is expected to cease. ponents previously removed, such as RCS/OMS Coordination of the Orbiter landing with comm­ modules, etc., will be reinstalled during the main­ ercial and/or private air traffic will be required. tenance effort. At the conclusion of the main­ tenance/modification period, there will

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us