The Newsletter of Crawford Broadcasting Company Corporate Engineering

The Newsletter of Crawford Broadcasting Company Corporate Engineering

The Newsletter of Crawford Broadcasting Company Corporate Engineering DECEMBER 2019 • VOLUME 29 • ISSUE 12 • W.C. ALEXANDER, CPBE, AMD, DRB EDITOR. All-Digital AM contour. As such, we have learned that the MA3 all- Late last month, the FCC released a Notice digital mode is viable. of Proposed Rulemaking addressing All-Digital AM Another consideration in all-digital AM is Broadcasting as the next phase of the Revitalization that the primary digital subcarriers are contained of the AM Radio Service. We had heard rumblings within a bandwidth of ±5 kHz. In other words, the over the past month or so that this might well be in primary digital subcarriers in the MA3 mode occupy the works, and indeed it is. The chairman is, to some the same spectrum that analog AM signals now extent, behind it, so it has some momentum. occupy; they do not extend into adjacent channels or This NPRM is the result of a grassroots require additional antenna system bandwidth as the effort by Bryan Broadcasting, which filed a petition MA1 hybrid digital mode does. That means that most last March to allow AM broadcasters to implement antenna systems will be able to pass the MA3 the all-digital mode on a voluntary basis. We filed primary digital subcarriers, and that’s great news for comments in support of this, and those comments stations with bandwidth-challenged antenna systems were referenced in a couple of places in the NPRM. or multiplexed operations. A good number of questions were raised in If a station wishes to transmit ancillary data the NPRM. The FCC clearly recognizes the problems using the secondary (upper) and tertiary (lower) plaguing the AM broadcast medium – noise, noise subcarriers, those will occupy the spectrum between and more noise, mostly manmade; the ready 5 and 9.5 kHz on either side of the carrier frequency, availability of higher-fidelity alternatives; and but at -30 dBc, or 5 dB lower than the primary digital interference, particularly at night. It also recognizes carriers in the MA1 hybrid mode. Evidently that is that all-digital operation can overcome much of this, one of the areas in which WWFD struggled, putting AM stations on an even footing with other presumably due to antenna issues, and that may be an sources for those with HD-capable radios. This all issue for more bandwidth-challenged facilities. stems from the experimental testing done by Hubbard So the good news here is that interference to Broadcasting and several manufacturers at WWFD in adjacent-channel stations would be much less with Frederick, Maryland. Those tests, which continue to MA3 transmissions compared to MA1 hybrid this day (and were featured in the October issue of transmissions. Radio World Engineering Extra with a follow-up As with any change to a long-established feature to come out in that publication this month), medium or way of doing things, there are those in were a real eye-opener as to the potential of all- favor and those against, and there are pros and cons. digital AM. In the pros column we have greatly improved noise Two major conclusions came from those immunity, high-fidelity stereo audio, and PSD tests. One is that robust digital coverage extended to song/title and other ancillary data. In the cons column the daytime 0.5 mV/m contour and beyond, and the we have incompatibility with analog receivers and a other is that nighttime all-digital performance was number of unknowns, such as how all-digital good to the nighttime interference-free contour. That transmissions will perform in the presence of co- and is more than we can say about the analog day and adjacent-channel all-digital interference. Those night coverage of most AM stations, which suffer questions will only be answered if we actually try this from manmade noise even inside the 5 mV/m 1 The Local Oscillator December 2019 thing out here in the real world with a good number have playing on my desk as I write this. Just go on of stations. Amazon.com and search for HD Radio and you’ll get And then there is the “never-digital” crowd, a screen full of available receivers. which approaches the all-digital question in much the So is the time right for all-digital AM? I same way as the “never-Trump” people feel about would offer a resounding yes! But it must be on a our president. While all-digital operation is not a voluntary basis, with individual station licensees panacea by any means, I would put the “never- making the decision as to whether it is right for them. digital” crowd in the same bucket with buggy whip I think it could be right for AM stations whose manufacturers as internal combustion engine programming is 100% duplicated by a sister station powered vehicles came on the scene. It doesn’t take a or translator, and it could also be right for AM crystal ball to see that if there is not some kind of stations that are being “warehoused” and on which quantum improvement in the AM broadcast medium, there is no significant revenue being produced. I its audiences will continue to decline in coming years think it would be a mistake for non-duplicated AM and many stations will simply not be worth keeping stations with viable programming and revenue on the air. A lot of AM stations are already there in production to make the switch right now. reality, and many are held on the air by sister stations As I mentioned above, the FCC invites in the cluster or FM translators that duplicate much of comments on a number of questions in the All- their coverage. Digital AM NPRM, and it will be interesting to see So what about receivers? Are there enough what responses are submitted. We plan to submit out there to make it worthwhile for AM stations to comments in support, and we will answer as many of make the all-digital switch? At this point, probably those questions as we can. I believe that the FCC will not. Xperi, the licensor of HD Radio technology, enact these new rules permitting all-digital AM reports that there are currently more than 55 million transmissions on a voluntary basis, and by sometime HD Radio equipped cars in the United States, and next summer, we could see the first stations making that all major auto brands offer factory-installed HD the switch. Radio receivers, with HD Radio technology a Will any of Crawford’s stations make the standard feature in over 170 vehicle models. switch? I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if some do. Stay My own experience in recent years is that tuned… about half the rent cars that I have driven have been HD Radio equipped. Those, of course, represent new Detroit vehicles, and there’s no question that people are We are still looking for a chief engineer for hanging onto and driving vehicles longer than in our Detroit cluster. This is an excellent opportunity years past – the car I drive is 13 years old (and is HD for someone with at least ten years major market Radio equipped!) – but newer vehicles will continue experience and CBRE or higher certification. If you to enter the consumer fleet, and with them will come know of anyone who might be interested, they should HD Radio. As for home listeners, there are a number send a resume along with three references to of tabletop and portable HD Radio receivers [email protected]. available, including the $69 Sangean HDR-14 that I 2 The Local Oscillator December 2019 The New York Minutes By Brian Cunningham, CBRE Chief Engineer, CBC – Western New York Hello to all from Western New York! drop in a phase, it will trip the main breaker. Last month I had reported on a strange Thinking this was the issue, Earl was more than anomaly with our Nautel ND-5 at the WDCX(AM) capable in turning the transmitter back on, saving me transmitter site. The transmitter an hour and a half trip over there would run fine for days on end, just to reset a breaker. Upon then suddenly begin folding back arriving, he did in fact find the with SWR faults. At the end of transmitter's breaker tripped, so last month, after the second such he reset the breaker and called incident, I suspected that the me to report his findings. common point impedance had While on the phone, the slightly changed, causing an transmitter began folding back impedance mismatch between again with SWR trips, so I the transmitter’s output and the walked Earl through putting the antenna network. Armed for transmitter in analog mode only. bear, I made the trip back to The whole trip over to Rochester, Rochester with my oscilloscope, I was going over in my head OIB and spectrum analyzer to finally put this issue to what could possibly be causing this? I had already rest. I found the day/night common point impedances ruled out the antenna/phasor system and transmitter, to be near dead-on 50 ohms, so that theory was out. so the only other contributor was the AM-IBOC Next, I set up the spectrum analyzer to look exciter. at the digital spectrum and found that the upper and After arriving at the site and putting the lower sidebands were grossly out. This was transmitter back into HD mode and seeing the surprising to find as the DaySequerra modulation transmitter fold back with numerous SWR faults, I monitor was indicating HD lock and a strong robust went back to analog and powered down the AM- HD signal.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us