Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Tewkesbury in Gloucestershire Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions June 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the borough of Tewkesbury in Gloucestershire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 234 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE vii SUMMARY ix 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 9 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 11 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 13 6 NEXT STEPS 37 APPENDICES A Draft Recommendations for Tewkesbury (January 2001) 39 B Code of Practice on Written Consultation 43 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Ashchurch, Bishop’s Cleeve, Churchdown and Tewkesbury is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND v vi LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 26 June 2001 Dear Secretary of State On 27 June 2000 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Tewkesbury under the Local Government Act 1992. We published our draft recommendations in January 2001 and undertook an eight-week period of consultation. We have now prepared our final recommendations in the light of the consultation. We have substantially confirmed our draft recommendations, although some modifications have been made (see paragraphs 94-95) in the light of further evidence. This report sets out our final recommendations for changes to electoral arrangements in Tewkesbury. We recommend that Tewkesbury Borough Council should be served by 38 councillors representing 22 wards, and that changes should be made to ward boundaries in order to improve electoral equality, having regard to the statutory criteria. We recommend that the Council elections should continue to be held every four years. The Local Government Act 2000 contains provisions relating to changes to local authority electoral arrangements. However, until such time as Orders are made implementing those arrangements we are obliged to conduct our work in accordance with current legislation, and to continue our current approach to periodic electoral reviews. I would like to thank members and officers of the Borough Council and other local people who have contributed to the review. Their co-operation and assistance have been very much appreciated by Commissioners and staff. Yours sincerely PROFESSOR MALCOLM GRANT Chairman LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND vii viii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Commission began a review of Tewkesbury on 27 June 2000. We published our draft recommendations for electoral arrangements on 9 January 2001, after which we undertook an eight-week period of consultation. • This report summarises the representations we received during consultation on our draft recommendations, and contains our final recommendations to the Secretary of State. We found that the existing electoral arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in Tewkesbury: • in 22 of the 27 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for the borough and 15 wards vary by more than 20 per cent from the average; • by 2005 electoral equality is not expected to improve, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average in 23 wards and by more than 20 per cent in 15 wards. Our main final recommendations for future electoral arrangements (Figures 1 and 2 and paragraphs 94-95) are that: • Tewkesbury Borough Council should have 38 councillors, two more than at present; • there should be 22 wards, instead of 27 as at present; • the boundaries of 26 of the existing wards should be modified and one ward should retain its existing boundaries; • elections should continue to take place every four years. These recommendations seek to ensure that the number of electors represented by each borough councillor is as nearly as possible the same, having regard to local circumstances. • In 15 of the proposed 22 wards the number of electors per councillor would vary by no more than 10 per cent from the borough average. • This level of electoral equality is forecast to improve further, with the number of electors per councillor in only one ward, Twyning, expected to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average for the borough in 2005. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ix Recommendations are also made for changes to parish council electoral arrangements which provide for: • revised warding arrangements and the redistribution of councillors for the parishes of Ashchurch, Bishop’s Cleeve, Churchdown and Tewkesbury. All further correspondence on these recommendations and the matters discussed in this report should be addressed to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, who will not make an Order implementing the Commission’s recommendations before 7 August 2001: The Secretary of State Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions Local Government Sponsorship Division Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU x LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Figure 1: The Commission’s Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference 1 Ashchurch with 2 Ashchurch ward (part – the proposed Rural parish Large map Walton Cardiff ward of Ashchurch parish); Tewkesbury Newtown ward (part – the parish of Walton Cardiff) 2 Badgeworth 1 Coombe Hill ward (part – the parishes of Map 2 Boddington and Staverton); Crickley ward (the parishes of Badgeworth and Great Witcombe) 3 Brockworth 3 Brockworth Glebe, Brockworth Moorfield and Map 2 Brockworth Westfield wards (Brockworth parish) 4 Churchdown 2 Churchdown Brookfield and Churchdown Pirton Large map Brookfield wards (part – the proposed Brookfield parish ward of Churchdown parish) 5 Churchdown St 3 Churchdown Parton and Churchdown Pirton Large map John’s wards (part – the proposed St John’s parish ward of Churchdown parish) 6 Cleeve Hill 2 Cleeve Hill ward (part – the parishes of Prescott, Map 2 Southam and Woodmancote) 7 Coombe Hill 2 Coombe Hill ward (part – the parishes of Map 2 Deerhurst, Elmstone Hardwicke, Leigh and Uckington); De Winton ward (part – the parishes of Longford, Norton, Sandhurst and Twigworth) 8 Grange 1 Bishop’s Cleeve South ward (part – the proposed Large map South parish ward of Bishop’s Cleeve parish) 9 Highnam with 2 Haw Bridge ward (the parishes of Ashleworth, Map 2 Haw Bridge Chaceley, Forthampton, Hasfield, Maisemore and Tirley); Highnam ward (the parishes of Highnam and Minsterworth) 10 Hucclecote 1 Horsbere ward (part – the parish of Hucclecote) Map 2 11 Innsworth with 1 Churchdown Parton ward (part – the proposed Map 2 Down Hatherley RAF Innsworth parish ward of Churchdown parish); De Winton ward (part – the parish of Down Hatherley); Innsworth ward (the parish of Innsworth) 12 Isbourne 1 Dumbleton ward (part – the parishes of Buckland, Map 2 Dumbleton, Snowshill, Stanton and Toddington); Gotherington ward (part – the parish of Teddington) 13 Northway 2 Ashchurch ward (part – the proposed Northway Large map parish ward of Ashchurch parish) LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND xi Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map councillors reference 14 Oxenton Hill 1 Coombe Hill ward (part – the parish of Stoke Map 2 Orchard); Gotherington ward (part – the parishes of Gotherington and Oxenton) 15 Pullar 2 Bishop’s Cleeve North and Bishop’s Cleeve South Large map wards (part – the proposed West parish ward of Bishop’s Cleeve parish) 16 St Michael’s 2 Bishop’s Cleeve East, Bishop’s Cleeve North and Large map Bishop’s Cleeve South wards (part – the proposed East parish ward of Bishop’s Cleeve parish) 17 Shurdington 1 Unchanged: Shurdington ward (the parish of Map 2 Shurdington) 18 Tewkesbury 1 Ashchurch ward (part – the proposed Newtown Large map Newtown parish ward of Ashchurch parish); Tewkesbury Newtown ward (part – the proposed Newtown parish ward of Tewkesbury parish) 19 Tewkesbury 2 Tewkesbury Prior’s Park ward (part – the Large map Prior’s Park proposed Prior’s Park parish ward of Tewkesbury parish) 20 Tewkesbury Town 2 Tewkesbury Mitton, Tewkesbury Newtown, Large map with Mitton Tewkesbury Prior’s Park and Tewkesbury Town wards (part – the proposed Town with Mitton parish ward of Tewkesbury parish) 21 Twyning 1 Tewkesbury Mitton ward (part – the proposed Map 2 Mythe parish ward of Tewkesbury parish); Twyning ward (the parish of Twyning) 22 Winchcombe 3 Dumbleton ward (part – the parish of Stanway); Map 2 Gotherington ward (part – the