"References." Secular Bodies, Affects and Emotions: European Configurations. Ed. Monique Scheer, Nadia Fadil and Johansen Schepelern Birgitte

"References." Secular Bodies, Affects and Emotions: European Configurations. Ed. Monique Scheer, Nadia Fadil and Johansen Schepelern Birgitte

"References." Secular Bodies, Affects and Emotions: European Configurations. Ed. Monique Scheer, Nadia Fadil and Johansen Schepelern Birgitte. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 221–250. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 1 Oct. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350065253.0007>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 1 October 2021, 06:09 UTC. Copyright © Monique Scheer, Nadia Fadil and Birgitte Schepelern Johansen and Contributors 2019. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. References Chapter 1 Agrama, H. (2012), Questioning Secularism: Islam, Sovereignty and the Rule of the Law in Modern Egypt, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. Anidjar, G. (2003), The Jew, the Arab. A History of the Enemy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Asad, T. (1979), ‘Anthropology and the Analysis of Ideology’, Man, 14 (4): 607–627. Asad, T. (1982), ‘Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz’, Man, 18 (2): 237–259. Asad, T. (1993), Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reason of Power in Christianity and Islam, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Asad, T. (2003), Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Asad, T. (2011), ‘Thinking about the Secular Body, Pain, and Liberal Politics’, Cultural Anthropology, 26 (4): 657–675. Barsalou, L. W. (2008), ‘Grounded Cognition’, Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 617–645. Bear, L. and N. Mathur (2015), ‘Introduction. Remaking the Public Good: A New Anthropology of Bureaucracy’, Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33 (1): 18–34. Beckford, J. and A. P. Hampshire (1983), ‘Religious Sects and the Concept of Deviance: The Mormons and the Moonies’, British Journal of Sociology, 34 (2): 208–229. Berger, P., ed. (1999), The Desecularisation of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Washington: Ethics & Public Policy Center. Berlant, L. (2011), Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Beyer, P. (1994), Religion and Globalisation, London: Sage. Binder, S. (2017), ‘Total Atheism: Making “Mental Revolution” in South India’, PhD diss, Utrecht University. Bourdieu, P. (2006 [1977]), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Brown, W. (2006), Regulating Aversion: Tolerance and Identity in the Age of Empire, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Brown, W. (2013), ‘Introduction’, in T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler and S. Mahmood (eds), Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech, 7–19, New York, NY: Fordham University Press. Bubandt, N. O. and M. van Beek, eds (2012), Varieties of Secularism in Asia: Anthropological Explorations of Religion, Politics and the Spiritual, London: Routledge. Burkitt, I. (1997), ‘Social Relationships and Emotions’, Sociology, 31 (1): 37–55. Cannell, F. (2010), ‘The Anthropology of Secularism’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 39: 85–100. Cantwell Smith, W. (1978), The Meaning and End of Religion, London: SPCL. Casanova, J. (1994), Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 222 References Connolly, W. E. (1999), Why I Am Not a Secularist, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Connolly, W. E. (2002), Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Csordas, T. J. (1990), ‘Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology’, Ethos, 18: 5–47. Dobbelaere, K. (1999), ‘Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization’, Sociology of Religion, 60 (3): 229–247. Dobbelaere, K. (2002), Secularization: An Analysis at Three Levels, Brussels: P.I.E. Lang. Douglas, M. (1980 [1969]), Purity and Danger: an Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Elias, N. (1998), ‘Homo Clausus: The Thinking Statues’, in N. Elias (ed.), On Civilization, Power, and Knowledge: Selected Writings, 269–292, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Engelke, M. (2014), ‘Christianity and the Anthropology of Secular Humanism’, Current Anthropology, 55 (S10): S292–S301. Fadil, N. (2014), ‘Asserting State Sovereignty. The Face Veil Ban in Belgium’, in E. Brems (ed.), The Experience of Face Veil Wearers in Europe and the Law, 251–262, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Fernando, M. (2012), ‘Belief and/in the Law’, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 24 (1): 71–80. Fernando, M. (2014), The Republic Unsettled: Muslim French and the Contradictions of Secularism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Gregg, M. and G. Seigworth, eds (2010), The Affect Theory Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Greil, A. L. and D. Bromley, eds (2003), Defining Religion: Investigating the Boundaries between the Sacred and the Secular, Bingley: Emerald Group. Gutkowski, S. (2012), ‘The British Secular Habitus and the War on Terror’, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27 (1): 87–103. Habermas, J. (2008), ‘Notes on Post-secular Society’, New Perspectives Quarterly, 25 (4): 17–29. Hirschkind, C. (2011), ‘Is There a Secular Body?’, Cultural Anthropology, 26 (4): 633–647. Hurd, E. S. (2008), The Politics of Secularism in International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Jakobsen, J. R. and A. Pellegrini, eds (2008), Secularisms, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Johansen, B. S. (2011), ‘“Doing the Secular”: Academic Practices in the Study of Religion at Two Danish Universities’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10 (3): 279–293. Keane, W. (2013), ‘Secularism as a Moral Narrative of Modernity’, Transit: Europäische Revue, 43: 159–170. Lauwers, J. (1974), ‘Les théories sociologiques concernant la sécularisation: Typologie et critique’, Social Compass, 20 (4): 523–533. Leavitt, J. (1996), ‘Meaning and Feeling in the Anthropology of Emotions’, American Ethnologist, 23: 514–539. Lewicki, P. (2016), ‘European Bodies? Class and Gender Dynamics among EU Civil Servants in Brussels’, Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 25 (2): 116–138. Leys, R. (2011), ‘The Turn to Affect: A Critique’, Critical Inquiry, 37 (1): 434–472. Luckmann, T. and P. Berger (1991 [1966]), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Penguin. Luehrmann, S. (2011), Secularism Soviet Style: Teaching Atheism and Religion in a Volga Republic, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. References 223 Lutz, C. (1988), Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. Lutz, C. and L. Abu-Lughod, eds (1990), Language and the Politics of Emotion, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lyon, M. L. (1997), ‘The Material Body, Social Processes and Emotion: “Techniques of the Body” Revisited’, Body & Society, 3: 83–101. Mahmood, S. (2006), Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Mahmood, S. (2009), ‘Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide?’, Critical Inquiry, 35 (4): 836–862. Mahmood, S. (2016), Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Martin, D. (1969), ‘Towards Eliminating the Concept of Secularisation’, in D. Martin (ed.), The Religious and the Secular: Studies in Secularization, 9–22, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Martin, D. (1978), A General Theory of Secularization, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Massumi, B. (1995), ‘The Autonomy of Affect’, Cultural Critique, 31: 83–109. Massumi, B. (2015), Politics of Affect, London: Polity. McCarthy Brown, K. (1991), Mama Lola: A Vodou Priestess in Brooklyn, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. McDannell, C. (1995), Material Christianity: Religion and Popular Culture in America, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962), Phenomenology of Perception, New York, NY: Humanities Press. Meyer, B., ed. (2009), Aesthetic Formations: Media, Religion and the Public Sphere, New York: Palgrave. Moors, A. (2009), ‘The Dutch and the Face-Veil: The Politics of Discomfort,’ Social Anthropology, 17 (4): 393–408. Morgan, D., ed. (2010), Religion and Material Culture: The Matter of Belief, London: Routledge. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012), The Make-Believe Space: Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Orsi, R. (1985), The Madonna of 115th Street: Faith and Community in Italian Harlem, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Pelkmans, M. (2017), Fragile Conviction: Changing Ideological Landscapes in Urban Kyrgyzstan, Ithaca, NY: Cornall University Press. Pellegrini, A. (2009), ‘Feeling Secular’, Women and Performance, 19 (2): 205–218. Plamper, J. (2015), The History of Emotions: An Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Proudfoot, W. (1985), Religious Experience, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Quack, J. (2012), Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Reckwitz, A. (2012), ‘Affective Spaces: A Praxeological Outlook’, Rethinking History, 16 (2): 241–258. Reddy, W. (2001), The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Rosaldo, M. Z. (1984), ‘Toward an Anthropology of Self and Feeling’, in R. Shweder and R. A. LeVine (eds), Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, 137–157, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Rosenwein, B. H. (2002),

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    31 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us