Redcar and Cleveland Personal Details: Name: Lynn Buckton E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I have lived in Dormanstown for over 23 years. I moved here when my husband decided to come back home. My husband was born and lived all his chilhood in Dormanstown. Dormanstown was built for the workers of the steel industry. Also building some of the countries first retirement homes. It makes no sense to me as a resident why the steel work site is been removed from dormanstown. Whilst removing the industry from what is already a deprived and poor ward why would you want to do this as it will only make the ward poorer and less funds available when the industry goes so does any section 106 money which can only help and support the ward. id like to see the ward back with its heritage in tact and 3 ward councillors as i believe our ward is best represented with 3 rather than 2 which will make things harder for me as they will have a bigger work load and less support. Also as a member of friends of westfield farm we have used funding from the councillors on a number of occasions in order for us to put on events for the community. Our biggest been last year when we opened up the 100yrs celebrations and are continuing with this. this year. i am sure if i had the time to write a petition there would be a high percentage of the residents sign it. Yours Mrs L Buckton Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Redcar and Cleveland Personal Details: Name: Jeremy Crow E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 2: Transfer area east of line to Coatham or Dormanstown. NB approximate line, use Natural 3: UseEngland steelworks boundary property data for boundary Coatham Marsh 1: Transfer area north-east of this line to Dormanstown 4: Perhaps include in Kirkleatha Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Transfer area north-east of this line to Dormanstown Annotation 2: Transfer area east of line to Coatham or Dormanstown. NB approximate line, use Natural England boundary data for Coatham Marsh Annotation 3: Use steelworks property boundary Annotation 4: Perhaps include Business Park in Kirkleatham ward Annotation 5: Include remainder of racecourse in West Dyke ward Annotation 6: Transfer Mackinlay Park to Zetland ward (option 1) Annotation 7: Transfer Mackinlay Park and fields to Zetland ward using Parish boundary (option 2) Comment text: On the proposed South Bank ward - which appears to be based on the South Tees Development Corporation area excluding South Gare - I can understand the accountability of encompassing this area in a single ward but this reduces the scrutiny of future plans. Also, the former SSI site and especially Coatham Marsh are more contiguous with Dormanstown or Coatham than South Bank. I propose two alternative boundaries, either Dabholm Cut centreline between the former Redcar steelworks and Teesport (Annotation 1 - Transfer area north-east of this line to Dormanstown) or the western edge of Coatham Marsh (Annotation 2 - Transfer area east of line to Coatham or Dormanstown. NB approximate line, use Natural England boundary data for Coatham Marsh). I agree with your proposal for South Gare to be transferred to Coatham ward due to access but suggest the boundary-line should be the property boundary of the steelworks rather than the centreline of South Gare Road for the same reason (Annotation 3 - Use steelworks property boundary). On Kirkleatham ward, I agree it makes much more sense to include Kirkleatham village and Yearby in Kirkleatham as proposed than Dormanstown as currently. Perhaps Kirkleatham Business Park could be included in Kirkleatham too, but I don't have a strong preference for this (Annotation 4). I suggest the whole of Redcar Racecourse should be in one ward as currently rather than two as proposed. West Dyke would be the obvious choice due to access (Annotation 5). I suggest Mackinlay Park should be in Zetland ward rather than Longbeck due access and local ties. The boundary could be either Green Lane (Annotation 6) or the Parish boundary (Annotation 7). On Mickledales ward, I agree that the housing south of Redcar Road be transferred from Longbeck, and Wheatlands Park from Kirkleatham as proposed. On names of wards in Redcar - 'Dormanstown', 'Newcomen', 'Kirkleatham' and 'Zetland' are OK. 'Coatham' is somewhat misleading as the ward includes both Coatham High Street ('High Street West') and Redcar High Street ('High Street East') as well as Warrenby but I realise it is the current name and I can't think of a better name to reflect the whole area. 'Mickledales' is fine for the parish ward but doesn't reflect the whole district ward, which is a combination of Mickledales, the Ings estate (aka the new Ings), Wheatlands Park, Wheatlands Chase, Scholar's View and the racecourse estate. I suggest 'Wheatlands' as this is the name of the local school. The existing name of 'West Dyke' doesn't reflect the current area geographically so retaining it for a smaller ward doesn't make sense either. The now-demolished West Dyke School wasn't in the current ward, only part West Dyke Road shares its western edge and few people remember the now-culverted watercourse of which only a part was in the ward from which it takes its name. As other local ward names are used in school names, I propose 'Ings Farm'. The name comes from the original farm on the site and is currently used by a local bus company to refer to the housing around Borough Road/Warwick Road and Castle Road (aka the old Ings estate). The other areas of housing in the ward don't have names that I'm aware of. An alternative could be 'Racecourse' but you would need to transfer the racecourse estate from the proposed Mickledales ward for this to make complete sense. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded Redcar and Cleveland Personal Details: Name: Jeremy Crow E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 7: Transfer Macki fields to Zetland Parish boundar east of town 6: Transfer Mackinlay Park to Zetland ward (option 1) 5: Include remainder of racecourse in West Dyke ward 4: Perhaps include Business Park in Kirkleatham ward Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Transfer area north-east of this line to Dormanstown Annotation 2: Transfer area east of line to Coatham or Dormanstown. NB approximate line, use Natural England boundary data for Coatham Marsh Annotation 3: Use steelworks property boundary Annotation 4: Perhaps include Business Park in Kirkleatham ward Annotation 5: Include remainder of racecourse in West Dyke ward Annotation 6: Transfer Mackinlay Park to Zetland ward (option 1) Annotation 7: Transfer Mackinlay Park and fields to Zetland ward using Parish boundary (option 2) Comment text: On the proposed South Bank ward - which appears to be based on the South Tees Development Corporation area excluding South Gare - I can understand the accountability of encompassing this area in a single ward but this reduces the scrutiny of future plans. Also, the former SSI site and especially Coatham Marsh are more contiguous with Dormanstown or Coatham than South Bank. I propose two alternative boundaries, either Dabholm Cut centreline between the former Redcar steelworks and Teesport (Annotation 1 - Transfer area north-east of this line to Dormanstown) or the western edge of Coatham Marsh (Annotation 2 - Transfer area east of line to Coatham or Dormanstown. NB approximate line, use Natural England boundary data for Coatham Marsh). I agree with your proposal for South Gare to be transferred to Coatham ward due to access but suggest the boundary-line should be the property boundary of the steelworks rather than the centreline of South Gare Road for the same reason (Annotation 3 - Use steelworks property boundary). On Kirkleatham ward, I agree it makes much more sense to include Kirkleatham village and Yearby in Kirkleatham as proposed than Dormanstown as currently. Perhaps Kirkleatham Business Park could be included in Kirkleatham too, but I don't have a strong preference for this (Annotation 4). I suggest the whole of Redcar Racecourse should be in one ward as currently rather than two as proposed. West Dyke would be the obvious choice due to access (Annotation 5). I suggest Mackinlay Park should be in Zetland ward rather than Longbeck due access and local ties. The boundary could be either Green Lane (Annotation 6) or the Parish boundary (Annotation 7). On Mickledales ward, I agree that the housing south of Redcar Road be transferred from Longbeck, and Wheatlands Park from Kirkleatham as proposed. On names of wards in Redcar - 'Dormanstown', 'Newcomen', 'Kirkleatham' and 'Zetland' are OK. 'Coatham' is somewhat misleading as the ward includes both Coatham High Street ('High Street West') and Redcar High Street ('High Street East') as well as Warrenby but I realise it is the current name and I can't think of a better name to reflect the whole area. 'Mickledales' is fine for the parish ward but doesn't reflect the whole district ward, which is a combination of Mickledales, the Ings estate (aka the new Ings), Wheatlands Park, Wheatlands Chase, Scholar's View and the racecourse estate. I suggest 'Wheatlands' as this is the name of the local school. The existing name of 'West Dyke' doesn't reflect the current area geographically so retaining it for a smaller ward doesn't make sense either. The now-demolished West Dyke School wasn't in the current ward, only part West Dyke Road shares its western edge and few people remember the now-culverted watercourse of which only a part was in the ward from which it takes its name.