Free Movement and the Right to Protest

Free Movement and the Right to Protest

statewatch monitoring the state and civil liberties in the UK and Europe vol 13 no 1 January-February 2003 Free movement and the right to protest Information, intelligence and "personal data" is to be gathered on: potential demonstrators and other groupings expected to travel to the event and deemed to pose a potential threat to the maintenance of public law and order The freedom of movement for all EU citizens, one of its four by the unaccountable EU Police Chiefs Task Force, and the basic freedoms of the EU, is under attack when it comes to Security Office of the General Secretariat of the Council of the people exercising their right to protest. European Union (the 15 EU governments) is to "advise" on The "freedom of movement" of people is held to mean the operational plans to combat protests (see Viewpoint, page 21). right of citizens to move freely between the 15 countries of the Information, intelligence and "personal data" on: EU without being checked or controlled or having to say why potential demonstrators and other groupings expected to travel to the they are travelling. Martin Bangemann, then the EC event and deemed to pose a potential threat to the maintenance of Commissioner for the Internal Market, told the European public law and order Parliament in 1992: "We want any EC citizen to go from are to be supplied by each national police and security agency to Hamburg to London without a passport" (Statewatch, vol 2 no 6). the state where the protest is planned - on a monthly, then weekly This "freedom" was never uniformly implemented but today it and finally daily basis up to the event. There is no suggestion that seems very far away given from the numerous checks faced by the data supplied be limited to those convicted of violent airline passengers - and a Spanish proposal would extend the offences. The handbook says that EU member states should: USA demand for personal details on all travellers going there prior to take-off to travel within the EU. utilise.. measures to prevent individuals or groups considered to be a Post 11 September 2001 these checks are said to be threat to the maintenance of public order from travelling to the necessary for safe air travel and to exclude suspected terrorists, location of the event "illegal" migrants (who are all seen as potential terrorists or At land borders "preventive patrols and controls may be criminals) and so-called "inadmissibles" from entering the EU. carried out" and "necessary arrangements for a quick and These moves come on top of the EU governments plans to efficient" expulsion should be in place. Such plans are clearly combat cross-border protests put in place after Gothenburg (June intended to undermine the right to protest by treating all 2001) and Genoa (July 2001) (Statewatch bulletin, vol 11 no protestors as potential "suspects". There are, however, real limits 3/4). on how effective they can be when thousands upon thousands Most surveillance checks concern air travel but when it travel to join hundreds of thousands from the host country (as comes to combating protests they extend to land borders too. happened in Genoa). Since June 2001, powers to introduce land border checks, under An article in this issue looks at what happened at Davos, Article 2.2 of the Schengen Convention, have been invoked on Switzerland in January when despite promises the protest was 16 occasions by EU states and 12 of these concerned anticipated stopped far away from the World Economic Forum meeting. It cross-border protests (Statewatch European Monitor, vol 3 no 3, also looks at the plans being laid by the Swiss and French 2003). Tens of thousands of protestors have been checked at land governments to counter protests in Evian, France at the G8 borders and thousands refused entry - some have been recorded meeting in June (see page 20). on the Schengen Information System (SIS). Freedom of movement and the right to protest are In December 2002 the Justice and Home Affairs Council intrinsically linked in a democractic society, but will the endgame noted the production of a "Security handbook" to counter be an attempt to ban on EU travel to take part in a cross-border protests at EU Summits and international meetings (like G8) held demonstration? in the EU. The power to revise this handbook is to be undertaken IN THIS ISSUE UK: Nationality, Immigration & Asylum Act see page 18 Viewpoint: Birth of the EU’s Interior Ministry? see page 21 Statewatch, PO Box 1516, London N16 0EW, UK Tel: (00 44) 020 8802 1882 Fax: (00 44) 020 8880 1727 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.statewatch.org © Statewatch ISSN 0961-7280. Material in the bulletin may be used if an acknowledgement is given. that the men "did not have any terrorist links". The 28 suspects CIVIL LIBERTIES were released on orders from a Naples investigating judge, Ettore Favara, on 12 February. Favara argued that the supporting evidence was "confused and unclear", and that "elements UK collected...can only lead to a considerable reduction in the seriousness of the evidence regarding the [persons] concerned". Over 50,000 "innocent" DNA He also noted that the building was managed by a man linked to the Giuliano family (involved in Neapolitan organised crime, the profiles on database Camorra) in an area "where it is reasonable to hypothesise that Last September's judicial review of the 2001 Criminal Justice and there is almost complete control...by the clans of the area". Police Act's amendments to the Police and Criminal Evidence Favara criticised the handling of the raid, claiming that "it would Act, ruled that the retention of DNA samples is "necessary in a have been desirable that the searches and confiscations...should democratic society". have been carried out on an individual basis, with a clear In October the Labour MP, Harry Cohen, asked in indication of the person from whom material was confiscated...", parliament how many individuals have personal data relating to and that fingerprint tests were not carried out on the confiscated fingerprints or DNA stored on national police computers and materials. what percentage of these records relate to individuals who are not Pakistan's ambassador in Rome claimed that Pakistani criminals and are not suspected of any criminality. Of the citizens had been randomly arrested without grounds for 1,884,450 DNA profiles maintained on the database 55,032 suspicion in recent months. A number of operations have resulted "profiles were marked as acquitted". These were taken from "all in the arrest of citizens of Islamic countries in Italy on charges of those charged with or informed they will be reported for a "international terrorism", some of which have proved unfounded. recordable offence, but against whom the prosecution was not 15 Pakistanis suspected of being part of Lashkar i Jhangvi, an proceeded with or those who were subsequently acquitted by the organisation accused of links with al Qaeda, have been in prison courts." in Caltanissetta (Sicily) for over five months as a result of an Last January the Home Office announced that it would take operation conducted on the night of 4-5 August on a Romanian DNA samples from 13,000 prisoners and mentally disordered ship, the Sara. They were crew members that should have offenders who had been convicted prior to the database's disembarked in Tripoli, the ship's previous port of call. Misteri introduction. They will be added to the profiles already on d'Italia newsletter reports that the arrests were based on the record. The Home Office will have the power to take the samples confiscation of false passports and the testimony of one of the without consent and all such prisoners and patients will have the Romanian sailors, who claims that he heard the Pakistanis talking samples taken prior to their release from prison or hospital care. between themselves, and that they were Talibans. However, the John Denham, a Home Office minister, said that:"DNA profiles sailor does not speak Urdu. of a minority of prisoners and mentally disordered offenders are Four Moroccan citizens and Italian pensioner Germano not on the database. We are addressing that." Caldon, a former art history professor from Padua, were arrested In February one of the scientists who co-discovered the on 19 August 2002 accused of "subversive association" and DNA double helix, James Watson, told the BBC that everybody "terrorism" as part of a suspected plot to carry out an attack on in Europe and the United States should have their genetic the San Petronio basilica in Bologna. The Moroccans, who hold fingerprints entered into an international database (see also, residence permits and work in Italy, were suspected of planning Statewatch vol 12 nos 2 & 5). This would, he claimed, enable law an attack due to some comments made by the two of the men, enforcement agencies to fight crime and terrorism. Arguing that Abdallah Wakouz and Lahacem Essaghir, when the five men Europe and the USA could produce such a database "cheaply and visited the church. The comments referred to bin Laden, and easily", Watson dismissed civil liberties concerns as "irrational". when a better time to visit the church would be. A day after the He went on to advocate a policy of eugenics, suggesting that arrests and renewed media panic over terrorism, the five were "stupidity" is a genetic disease that could be "identified" and released. Prosecuting magistrate Paolo Giovagnoli withdrew his "corrected". Such ideas were popular in nazi Germany, where request for "preventative custody" after Caldon had explained hundreds of thousands of physically and mentally handicapped that he suggested the visit as the four Moroccans had to collect people ("the feeble-minded") were murdered.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    24 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us