09/29/21 BENVGPL6: Comparative Planning Systems and Cultures | University College London BENVGPL6: Comparative Planning View Online Systems and Cultures 1 Sanyal B. Introduction Chapter. In: Comparative planning cultures. New York: : Routledge 2005. 2 Gielen DM, Tasan-Kok T. Flexibility in Planning and the Consequences for Public-value Capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies 2010;18 :1097–131. doi:10.1080/09654311003744191 3 Rozee L. A new vision for planning – There must be a better way? Planning Theory & Practice 2014;15:124–38. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.873231 4 Colomb C, Tomaney J. Territorial Politics, Devolution and Spatial Planning in the UK: Results, Prospects, Lessons. Planning Practice & Research 2016;31:1–22. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1081337 5 Arbaci S. Ethnic Segregation, Housing Systems and Welfare Regimes in Europe. European Journal of Housing Policy 2007;7:401–33. doi:10.1080/14616710701650443 6 1/3 09/29/21 BENVGPL6: Comparative Planning Systems and Cultures | University College London Fainstein S. Chapter 2 ‘Land Value Capture and Justice’. In: Value capture and land policies . Cambridge, Mass: : Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 2012. 7 Hirt S. Home, Sweet Home: American Residential Zoning in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2013;33:292–309. doi:10.1177/0739456X13494242 8 Blomley N. Land use, planning, and the "difficult character of property”. Planning Theory & Practice 2016;:1–14. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1179336 9 Chapter ‘State and urban space in Brazil: from modernist planning to democratic interventions’ in Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. In: Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470696569 10 ‘Post-Third-World City’ or Neoliberal ‘City of Exception’? Rio de Janeiro in the Olympic Era. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.12338/epdf 11 Datta A. New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography 2015;5:3–22. doi:10.1177/2043820614565748 12 Roy A. Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities: Informality, Insurgence and the Idiom of Urbanization. Planning Theory 2009;8:76–87. doi:10.1177/1473095208099299 13 2/3 09/29/21 BENVGPL6: Comparative Planning Systems and Cultures | University College London Leaf M, Hou L. The ‘Third Spring’ of Urban Planning in China: The Resurrection of Professional Planning in the Post-Mao Era. China Information 2006;20:553–85. doi:10.1177/0920203X06070043 14 Planning the Competitive City-Region: The Emergence of Strategic Development Plan in China. Urban Affairs Review 2007;42:714–40. doi:10.1177/1078087406298119 15 Waterhout B, Othengrafen F, Sykes O. Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration. Planning Practice and Research 2013;28:141–59. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699261 16 Stead D. Convergence, Divergence, or Constancy of Spatial Planning? Connecting Theoretical Concepts with Empirical Evidence from Europe. Journal of Planning Literature 2013;28:19–31. doi:10.1177/0885412212471562 17 Friedmann J. Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning 2005;64:183–234. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2005.05.001 18 Waterhout B, Othengrafen F, Sykes O. Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration. Planning Practice and Research 2013;28:141–59. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699261 3/3.