HISTORICALLY INEVITABLE?: TURNING POINTS OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Tony Brenton,Donald Crawford,Sean McMeekin,Dominic Lieven,Orlando Figes,Richard Sakwa,Douglas Smith,Martin Sixsmith,Professor Simon Dixon,Boris Kolonitsky | 384 pages | 23 Jun 2016 | Profile Books Ltd | 9781781250211 | English | London, United Kingdom Historically Inevitable?: Turning Points of the Russian Revolution PDF Book Slavisa rated it it was amazing Jan 03, Tony Brenton's afterword to the volume draws parallels between the Revolution and the ultimate collapse of the Soviet Union in , and places the events of in the context of more recent events in Russia and the Crimea. Most contemporary historians of the Russia recognise that the Bolshevik path to victory in could have been derailed several times and that they were lucky to survive the first few years of their rule. In Was Revolution Inevitable? More filters. It was brought to fruition by the genius of Lenin and pointed the world towards a better future. Craig rated it really liked it Jun 20, Whether there was any real alternative to Bolshevism or another dictatorship cannot be determined solely in reference to the contingency of events; it requires a consideration of many conditions and underlying factors. Sign up today. Marx held that the progression of society from capitalism to communism was 'historically inevitable'. Aug 05, Mikhail Ignatev rated it did not like it. Richard Pipes Contributor ,. This website requires cookies to provide all of its features. The Bolsheviks worked with and co-opted popular revolutions, and also repressed them, to seize power. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. View the recorded event. As a tool for historical research, counterfactual history has been dismissed by many historians on account of its purely speculative character, but it still retains the sympathy of a number of scholars working in various fields. Historically Inevitable? Michael Clifford: Evidence doesn't support family's belief Ian Bailey got away with murder. Got halfway through but could not finish it for the life of me. Preview — Historically Inevitable? If this one important implausible event had not happened, how may things have played out differently? Family Notices Book Notice. Even those who think that counterfactual history is no more than amusement might gain from the wealth of interesting information that is offered in Historically Inevitable. What would the world be like had Fanny Kaplan succeeded in assassinating Vladimir Lenin in ? THIS year marks the centenary of the most important event in 20 century global history: the Russian revolutions of This kind of counterfactual history can be fun to read, but it is seldom persuasive. Ilse rated it really liked it Apr 02, Trivia About Historically Inev For more information on what data is contained in the cookies, please see our Cookie Notice. About the book Marx held that the progression of society from capitalism to communism was 'historically inevitable'. The Russian Revolution put totalitarian communism into power, fueled Nazism and the Second World War, and forged one of the West's greatest antagonists. Tony Brenton, former British Ambassador in Moscow, compiled thought-provoking essays on counterfactual contingencies of the Russian Revolution. No Lenin, no revolution. What if the Bolsheviks had never imposed the brutal "War Communism" initiatives that devastated the Russian peasants? Some omissions are regrettable. Simon Dixon Contributor ,. The best food, health, entertainment and lifestyle content from the irishexaminer. Ryan rated it really liked it Nov 05, Rating details. Neil Robinson is professor of politics, University of Limerick. Tony Brenton. It is hard to see how the Constituent Assembly could have controlled them whenever it was elected. From the Russo-Japanese conflict of through to the appropriation of church property in , and focusing especially on the incredible chain of events in leading to the October Revolution itself, Historically Inevitable? Click here to download the sample directly. But was the Russian Revolution really inevitable? Worth exploring also was the possibility of Lenin not having succeeded in convincing the Bolsheviks to promote the treaty of Brest-Litovsk and the regime accepting Allied help against Germany in the context of the international war, considering the opposition that he faced to impose a line of action that appeared to all as cynical treason. Linz insisted in his Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes 17 , history shows that democracy has often developed where the supposed conditions for it were absent and has collapsed where it had good conditions to develop. Historically Inevitable?: Turning Points of the Russian Revolution Writer It is important to keep in mind that the various contributors often provide a personal perspective to historical problems that tend to be objects of controversy. Strong voices, sharp writing on the issues that matter to you. About the book Marx held that the progression of society from capitalism to communism was 'historically inevitable'. Kanwarjot Kaur rated it really liked it Feb 25, Lead detective: I owed Adrian Donohoe justice. Michael Clifford: Evidence doesn't support family's belief Ian Bailey got away with murder. Live News ePaper. Ilse rated it really liked it Apr 02, Orlando Figes Contributor ,. Tsarism was always going to fail the test of modern warfare in World War I. Surprisingly, I know enough about the Russian Revolution to have understood most of the book. Ryan rated it really liked it Nov 05, If this one important implausible event had not happened, how may things have played out differently? Stay connected. Jul 30, Alek rated it it was ok Shelves: dnf , social-sciences. This collection of fourteen contributions from the world's leading Russian scholars attempts to answer the question by looking back at the key t Marx held that the progression of society from capitalism to communism was 'historically inevitable'. Details if other :. Neil Robinson is professor of politics, University of Limerick. This, of course, is not likely to provoke controversy. More in this section. This has always involved taking into account the accidents that produced Bolshevik success as well as factors like World War I that propelled Russia towards revolution. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Related Posts Book Reviews. Sean McMeekin, Richard Pipes and Orlando Figes argue that the October Revolution could have been avoided if Lenin had been prevented from going to Russia, if General Lev Kornilov had been allowed to suppress Lenin and the Bolsheviks before October, or if Lenin had been arrested on his way to the meeting that launched the October seizure of power. My Account. Brenton simply assures us that claims of historical inevitability cannot be assessed except through counterfactual history; but the reader is left with doubts as to whether this exercise might have a bit more to contribute to the historiography of the Russian Revolution or the Soviet state. Eric Lee rated it it was amazing Aug 19, Dmitriy rated it liked it Nov 02, If you happen to love ca I expected this book to be a balanced look at the historical moments surrounding the Bolshevik Revolution and the ways in which events could have produced different outcomes. As they did this they rebuilt the state and began to face up to the tasks of transforming the economy. Lifestyle Newsletter. Start your review of Historically Inevitable? JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. Close It appears you don't have the ability to view PDFs in this browser. However, it does. Yet, it would have been opportune if the book had offered reasons to think that counterfactual history has any utility in historiography. Instead, I ended up reading a series of essays all of which basically amounted to "how we might have stopped communism". Click here to download the sample directly. Refresh and try again. Showing The answer is speculation. Error rating book. Preeminent scholars, including Orlando Figes, Richard Pipes, Douglas Smith, and Martin Sixsmith, ruminate on these questions and many others, assembling a series of pivotal moments that reveal what might have gone differently, and, if so, what the repercussions would have been. Find this book:. Historically Inevitable?: Turning Points of the Russian Revolution Reviews About the author Blog Admin. Showing Books by Tony Brenton. Tony Brenton. Book Reviews. I expected this book to be a balanced look at the historical moments surrounding the Bolshevik Revolution and the ways in which events could have produced different outcomes. In Was Revolution Inevitable? Download our mobile apps on. Surprisingly, I know enough about the Russian Revolution to have understood most of the book. A few more years of life in office for Stolypin would not have saved tsarism. Erik Landis Contributor ,. Kanwarjot Kaur rated it really liked it Feb 25, Instead, I ended up reading a series of essays all of which basically amounted to "how we might have stopped communism". Marx held that the progression of society from capitalism to communism was 'historically inevitable'. I even enjoyed much of it. Web development by Firsty Group. Or does it mean that, in a given historical scenario, the various relevant factors are conducive to one outcome that cannot be changed? Douglas Smith Contributor ,. It was the end of all hopes for democracy in Russia; the beginning of seventy years of unbending communist autocracy. Preview — Historically Inevitable? These are different ideas with different implications, but the book seems to conflate them at certain times. Details if other :. This means we already recognise there was nothing inevitable in what happened in Russia after February Dominic Lieven Contributor ,. Eric Lee rated it it was amazing Aug 19, Created with Sketch. If this one important implausible event had not happened, how may things have played out differently? Most of the essays, however, tend to adopt the second meaning, which provides a more interesting content for assessment and might allow us to connect the results of this exercise with general discussions about what preconditions are needed for political regimes to develop or fail.