Australasian Journal of Herpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print)1 Issue 12, 30 April 2012 ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Australasian Journal of Herpetology Hoser 2012 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 9:1-64. Available online at www.herp.net Contents on pageCopyright- 2. Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved 2 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Issue 12, 30 April 2012 Australasian Journal of Herpetology CONTENTS ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A New Genus of Coral Snake from Japan (Serpentes:Elapidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 3-5. A revision of the Asian Pitvipers, referred to the genus Cryptelytrops Cope, 1860, with the creation of a new genus Adelynhoserea to accommodate six divergent species (Serpentes:Viperidae:Crotalinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 6-8. A division of the South-east Asian Ratsnake genus Coelognathus (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 9-11. A new genus of Asian Snail-eating Snake (Serpentes:Pareatidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 10-12-15. The dissolution of the genus Rhadinophis Vogt, 1922 (Sepentes:Colubrinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 16-17. Three new species of Stegonotus from New Guinea (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 18-22. A new genus and new subgenus of snakes from the South African region (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 23-25. A division of the African Genus Psammophis Boie, 1825 into 4 genera and four further subgenera (Serpentes: Psammophiinae). Raymond T. Hoser, 26-31. A division of the African Tree Viper genus Atheris Cope, 1860 into four subgenera (Serpentes:Viperidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 32-35. A new Subgenus of Giant Snakes (Anaconda) from South America (Serpentes: Boidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 36-39. A review of the South American snake genera Leptodeira and Imantodes including three new genera and two new subgenera (Serpentes: Dipsadidae: Imantodini). Raymond T. Hoser, 40-47. A review of the North American Garter Snakes Genus Thamnophis Fitzinger, 1843 (Serpentes:Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 48-53. A three-way division of the New World Genus Lampropeltis Fitzinger, 1843 (Serpentes:Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 54-57. A review of the taxonomy of the European Colubrid snake genera Natrix and Coronella, with the creation of three new monotypic genera (Serpentes:Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 58-62. A New Genus and new species and new subspecies of skink from Victoria (Squamata:Scincidae). Raymond T. Hoser, 63-64. Divisions of the Asian Colubrid snake genera Xenochrophis, Dendrelaphis and Boiga (Serpentes: Colubridae). Raymond T. Hoser, 65-76. Hoser 2012 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 9:1-64. Available online at www.herp.net Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved Australasian Journal of Herpetology 3 Australasian Journal of Herpetology 12:3-5. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Published 30 April 2012. A New Genus of Coral Snake from Japan (Serpentes:Elapidae). Raymond T. Hoser 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: [email protected] Received 10 March 2012, Accepted 8 April 2012, Published 30 April 2012. ABSTRACT This paper reviews new phylogenetic studies of the Coral Snakes recently placed in the genus Sinomicrurus Slowinski et. al., 2001. The species japonicus is found to be sufficiently divergent from cogeners to warrant being placed in its own genus. As a result, this taxon is placed within the new genus Funkelapidus gen. nov, which is herein formally named and defined in accordance with the Zoological Code. Keywords: Taxonomic revision; new genus; species; Funkelapidus; Sinomicrurus; japonicus; systematics. INTRODUCTION et. al. (2003), Ota (2000). Ota et. al. (1999), Pope (1935), Numerous studies have recently been completed in terms of the Stejneger (1907), Stejneger (1910), Wall (1908a), Wall (1908b), so-called Asian Coral snakes. Whitaker and Ashok (2004), Zhao and Adler (1993), Ziegler et. Slowinski et. al. (2001) decided to split them all between three al. (2007). genera, namely Calliophis Gray, 1834, (into which they sub- Most recently the deep divergence between these superficially sumed the genus Maticora Gray, 1834), Hemibungarus Peters, physically similar snakes was highlighted in the results of the 1862, (which they made monotypic for Hemibungarus calligaster molecular phylogenetic analysis of Pyron et. al. 2011. Weimann, 1835) and for five species they created a new genus named Sinomicrurus Slowinski et. al., 2001. However a revisiting of the mtDNA data by Slowinski et. al. (2001) yielded a similar result (see fig 2. page 236) the relevant The currently recognized species within this now widely data of which seems to have been overlooked by both recognized genus are, Sinomicrurus macclellandi (Reinhardt, themselves and other herpetologists. 1844) (the type species), S. hatori (Takahashi, 1930), S. japonicus (Günther, 1868), S. kelloggi (Pope, 1928) and S. This may in part be due to the conflicting diagram based on sauteri (Steindachner, 1913). certain morphological characters, seen in Fig 1, p. 236 of Slowinski et. al. (above and on the very same page) which Due to the small size, similar habits and their relatively showed japonica well inside the cluster of other species placed inoffensive nature, these five species of snake have not come to within their newly erected genus Sinomicrurus. the attention of taxonomists from the point of view of close studies and investigation of differences at the level between However, the morphological convergence of these small elapids species within the single genus. has almost certainly masked the actually divergent histories of the relevant taxa. Ota et. al. (1999) has recently investigated S. japonicus and in 1999 described a subspecies of this taxon. Both the Fig 2 diagram in Slowinski et. al. (2001) and Fig C on page 336 of Pyron et. al. (2011) clearly and unmistakably Studies of the snakes as a group have tended to be in terms of showed the species japonica to be widely divergent of the other relationships to other snakes (other genera) rather than between species now classified within the genus Sinomicrurus, which as each other and whether they should or should not be split up a group, clustered very closely in both diagrams, based on the within the group. mtDNA evidence. This view is clearly obvious by the comments made in the In terms of distance apart, in Slowinski et. al.’s results they published results of studies like Lawson et. al. (2005), Pyron found Micruroides euryxanthus and Micrurus fulvius to be closer et.al. (2011) and Slowinski et. al. (2001). together than the taxon japonicus and the other species within However within this genus as currently recognized, there are two Sinomicrurus. clear and phylogenticially distinct groups of snakes. These are It should also be stressed herein that Micrurus and Micruroides the Japanese Coral Snake, currently known as Sinomicrurus are two widely recognized separate genera, (refer for example to japonicus (including subspecies and variants), versus all the Campbell and Lamar 2004) who’s status is not in dispute among others in the group; see Cox, et. al. (1998), Mori (1982), Orlov. Hoser 2012 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 12:3-5. taxonomists. Available online at www.herp.net Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved 4 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Pyron et. al’s results of 2011 found the divergences between rings along the body length, an appearance never seen in Micruroides euryxanthus and Micrurus fulvius to be about the Funkelapidus. In Hemibungarus orange is confined to the front, same as that between the species japonica and the other taxa rear or flanks and usually presents as blotches. within Sinomicrurus. Three subspecies of F. japonicus have been described. These Based on the results of Pyron et. al (2011), similar (near are: identical) earlier published results published in Campbell and F. japonicus boettgeri (Fritze, 1894) Lamar (2004) and obvious physical differences within the F. japonicus japonicus (Günther, 1868) relevant snakes (morphology, hemipenes and colouration), the F. japonicus takarai (Ota, et. al., 1999). new world genus Micrurus has been further split (Hoser 2012). Distribution: This species is endemic to Japan, and is found on As a result of the compelling differences within Sinomicrurus the Amami and Okinawa groups of the central Ryukyu Islands sensu lato as shown by the various relevant studies, it is clear (Ota 2010). The total land area of the Ryukyu Islands is 3,090 that the genus Sinomicrurus as currently recognized needs to be km², but the area in which this species is distributed is estimated split into two. It would also be inconsistent not to split the genus to be 2,631 km². Sinomicrurus as currently recognized. Conservation: Deforestation is occurring within this species’ The macclellandi group remains within Sinomicrurus as it relatively restricted known range, causing continuing declines in contains the type species, while the species japonicus is herein habitat quality on some of the islands. While, based on its island placed in a new genus that is diagnosed and named. distribution, the species is likely to occur in more than ten GENUS FUNKELAPIDUS GEN. NOV. locations, the population should be monitored in the event of Type species: Hemibungarus japonicus Günther, 1868 decline. (Known currently as Sinomicrurus japonicus) An unexpected decline would be most likely in the event of some Diagnosis: The snakes of this genus (monotypic for the species form of pest species becoming established in the snake’s japonicus) are easily separated from all those remaining in the habitat as opposed to direct human impact through collecting, genus Sinomicrurus on the basis of dorsal coloration of the head killing or even habitat loss. and neck. It would be prudent for captive populations of the snake to be In Funkelapidus gen. nov. there is no prominent white or established to protect the species from an unforeseen natural yellowish-white crossband running across the back of the head calamity that may affect wild stocks. or nearby neck. Common name: Japanese Coral Snake.