TORAH FROM JTS learn.jtsa.edu The Hebrew Bible in which this engraved frontispiece is found was printed in Venice in 1739 at the request of a physician named Isaac Foa. In addition to the Hebrew text, it contains Italian explanations of difficult passages. The engraver, Francesco Griselini (1717–1787), illustrated many non-Jewish works as well as notable borders for megillot, and later became known for פרשת וירא תשע"ה his scholarly writing on natural history. Parashat Vayera 5775 This is the most elaborate of the four frontispieces in this Bible, with images Looking Upward and Outward from the story of the Akedah (Binding of Isaac) in this week’s parashah. The number of images from just a few verses—the 11 images illustrate Genesis By Rabbi Matthew Berkowitz, Director of Israel Programs, 22:2–12—highlight the remarkable pace of this vignette, which is so rich in The Rabbinical School, JTS drama and theological significance. Sight and vision play an important role in the two opening narratives of Parashat Vayera. At the beginning of this week’s Torah reading, the newly Captions, clockwise from top-right: circumcised Abraham, resting in his abode of Elonei Mamre, “looks up” and sees “three men rooted before him” (Gen. 18:1–2). Their appearance triggers “Take your son, your favored one” (v. 2) a flurry of activity in the homestead of our ancestors as Abraham and Sarah “So early next morning, Abraham saddled his ass” (v.3) scurry to perform the mitzvah of hakhnasat orhim, hosting guests in one’s home. These mysterious messengers are pampered as guests, and then “He split the wood for the burnt offering” (v.3) deliver the news that Sarah will conceive. The gesture of Abraham setting his “and he set out for the place” (v.3) gaze “upward,” proves to be both a physical and spiritual act. The spiritual mirrors the physical as he tends to the needs of total strangers. Juxtaposed “[Abraham] put it on his son. He himself took the fire” (v.6) to this story of generosity and kindness, we then encounter the narrative of “He built an altar there” (adapted from v.9) Sodom and Gomorrah with their wicked inhabitants. Interestingly, it opens with the same men setting out on their journey, and in sharp contrast to “He laid him on the altar” (v.9) Abraham’s upwardly gazing posture, they “look down toward Sodom.” Once “And Abraham put out his hand to slaughter his son” (adapted from v. 10) again, the spiritual and physical acts intermingle and mirror each other. What more can be learned about the contrast and positioning of these two stories? [center image] “Do not raise your hand against the boy” (v. 12) Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch explains, “and his eye fell upon a ram” (v.13) From the hospitable meal at Abraham’s, they stood up and looked towards Sodom . Sodom offered the most complete contrast to the simple pure atmosphere from which these men were just emerging. They had just seen the foundation of a nation laid on two factors: a) sanctifying the body with all its urges and lures in pure moral submission to God in brit milah (the covenant of circumcision) and b) practicing universal brotherly love, as in the kindness that they themselves enjoyed in Abraham’s home. The hospitable meal at which they had just announced the first foundation stone of the future people of God offered such a contrast to Sodom, formed such a loftiness to the Sodomite debasement to which they now had to wend learn.jtsa.edu their way, that they “looked down to the plains of Sodom with To receive Torah from JTS by email, criticizing gauging consideration.” For that is the meaning of visit jtsa.edu/subscribe va’yashkifu, that “they looked down.” (Commentary on the Torah: Genesis, 318). TORAH FROM JTS learn.jtsa.edu Shakespeare was a master of juxtaposing opposites in his writings, and A Different Perspective | דבר אחר so too Torah. The stark contrast between the example of our ancestor Abraham and the behavior of the people of Sodom and Gomorrah gives us pause to reflect on what it means to build an ethical and moral An Illustration of the Binding of Isaac from The JTS Library civilization. Rabbi Hirsch emphasizes this notion in commenting on the expression used for the men looking out toward Sodom, “vayashkifu.” They look down, literally and figuratively, upon the evil that is unfolding in these twin cities. Abraham, on the other hand, looks up. The divine quality of the three men that have just appeared in his home shines through and through. And Abraham rises to the occasion. Yet, for Abraham, it is a matter of not only raising himself, but raising up humanity. Hirsch points out beautifully the complementary qualities of particularity and universality that we encounter in Abraham and Sarah’s tent. Particularity, as represented by brit milah (circumcision and being welcomed into the covenant); universality, as actualized in Abraham opening his “doors” to total strangers. Modern Jews wrestle daily between the two poles represented by our ancestor’s gestures some four thousand years ago. Far from only nurturing the narrow, particular identity toward deepening his roots, Abraham knows well that one must look outward and upward simultaneously. We cannot selfishly and narrowly tend to our own needs while the world cries and burns around us. In this very moment, such a tension is deeply felt in the Land of Israel in general, and in Jerusalem in particular, as the Jewish people struggles with the meaning of power and sovereignty on the one hand—being a people at home and emboldened to live freely in our homeland—and being attentive and sensitive to the needs of those with whom we share this blessed and passion-filled land on the other hand. Deep rootedness should propel our hands to reach out in embracing and bringing others to a sense of kedushah (holiness), as we act in the sacred image of our ancestor Abraham. Hirsch succeeds in sharpening our exegetical focus as we read through this text. For it is not simply the contrast that is of import; we must also recognize these moments as “the foundation of a nation.” Abraham’s descendants must sanctify their bodies and practice kindness to build a sacred future. Indeed, every moment in life presents us with the choice between Elonei Mamre or Sodom; it is a decision between embracing the presence of God and our fellow humans and banishing the Divine from our midst. Abraham is a multi-dimensional Israelite, concerned about particular identity with an eye to the universal world. May we always be blessed with the gumption and sight of Abraham, choosing the path of Elonei Mamre. The publication and distribution of the JTS Parashah Commentary are made possible by a generous Courtesy of The Library of The Jewish Theological Seminary. The image at top right has been grant from Rita Dee and Harold (z”l) Hassenfeld. digitally altered for this printing because the original contains the name of God. The original can be viewed in high-definition at learn.jtsa.edu. .