Flinders Research Centre for Coastal and Catchment Environments Schultz Oration 16 November 2007 Confronting Water Scarcity: Water Futures for South Australia Peter Cullen Adelaide Thinker in Residence, 2004 Introduction In 2004 I had the pleasure of living in Adelaide as Thinker in Residence, and was able to talk with many people about water, always a matter of great interest to South Australians. In my Thinker’s report to the people of Adelaide I said “The stark situation is that Adelaide is facing a squeeze on its available water, and that it would be prudent for the state to be considering how it will meet this demand, especially if additional water is either not available from the River Murray, or more likely is excessively saline for domestic use. Contingency planning should be underway for a situation when the River Murray cannot sustain the city.” This situation has now arisen. The MDBC Drought Contingency report last month showed salinity levels at Morgan had already almost doubled. While keeping them within drinking water levels is a management priority that guides releases from upstream storages, there is little water available and SA is not getting its normal MDB entitlement due to lack of water. Let me commend the MDBC for its drought reports available on its web site. But unless there is significant rain in the upper catchments there is every likelihood that salinity levels will make water in the Murray unsuitable for drinking early next year, and the rising salinity is likely to lead to fish kills and other water quality problems in the Lower River and Lakes. This is a wicked problem for our society and our politicians. Do we use available water to try to keep permanent plantings in irrigation areas alive and hope we get better rains to get us through next year, or do we hold water back to keep towns and Adelaide going next year? We face a situation with much less water available, and everyone believes they have a priority for its use. Riverland irrigators recently called on the Federal Government to take water from upstream irrigators to keep Riverland plantings alive. Melbourne and Canberra are both planning to take MDB water to augment urban supplies. Urban users also expect Snowy Hydro to maintain adequate water to provide peak electricity supply. Annual irrigators like rice and cotton growers have not had any water for some time. 1 Southern Australia is drying out. The demands on our dwindling water resources are escalating. Everyone believes their use of water should be the priority. The environment has been largely sacrificed with the Coorong rapidly becoming like the Dead Sea. We are facing a crisis. There will be a horrible shakeout in rural Australia and our cities are going to have to lift their games in water planning. The Climate Challenge I think most Australians know something is changing with our weather. We can measure the increased CO2 in the atmosphere, and we know it is due to human activities. We can observe that since 1950 Australian average temperatures have increased 0.9o C, and this change is predcietd by the greenhouse gas effects. The best estimate of annual warming over Australia by 2030 relative to 1990 is a further increase of about 1oC (CSIRO, 2007). Later in this century, the warming is projected to rise by around 1.8oC for the best-case scenario and around 3.4oC for a high emissions case, with a 20 to 50% chance of temperature increases exceeding 4oC in inland areas, such as the Murray Darling Basin. Further evidence of warming is provided by the snow record in southeast Australia where the snow depth at the start of October has declined 40 per cent in the past 40 years. This warming will lead to more evaporation from storages, increased transpiration of water by plants and an increased frequency of mega-bushfires. Scientists have no doubt that that increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are influencing rainfall patterns. CSIRO scientists have estimated that around half the decline in rainfall in Sth West WA is due to greenhouse gas. Predictions are of a 5-15% decrease in rainfall by 2070. It seems we are facing a future with declining and more erratic rainfall. Winter and spring rainfall will drop but there may be increases in summer thunderstorm activity. A small reduction in rainfall is accompanied by a larger reduction in runoff. We can see the reduction experienced in Perth since the 1970’s and can now see the same reduction for Sydney’s storages since around 1990. When we come to the MDB, the source of much of Adelaide’s water, the same picture emerges. This year the winter –spring rains have again failed. September inflows were 210 GL compared to a long-term average of 1610 GL. Monthly inflows have now been below average for the last 24 months. There is about half the water in the MDB storages (at 23% of capacity) now that at this time in 2006. One of the most important tributaries to the MDB is the Goulburn river, which in 2005-6 was at 58% of the long-term flow, following a year when it was 68% of long-term flow. Over the last 10 years it has averaged 62% of the long-term flow. As river levels fall, saline groundwater flows into the Murray. 2 I think we are seeing the double impact of a serious drought and climate change. But there is no guarantee our river flows are stable and they may continue to decline as has been the case in Perth. Hoping for rain seems to have been the main strategy to date, but as a community we now need to get cracking so as to cope with the water deficit that is emerging in Southeastern Australia. We must move from denial to acceptance, since the time is short and the risks and costs escalate as we dither. A Blueprint for Addressing Water Scarcity The good news is we have a blueprint for facing water scarcity in the National Water Initiative that has been agreed by the Premiers and Prime Minister. This blueprint is as good as it gets, and will let us cope if we could only get on and implement it. They give us the best possible framework for coping with water scarcity, but we have been slow to implement them and this tardiness is putting communities at risk. • Understand how much water we have and how we use it • Determine how much water we can take and still have healthy rivers and secure groundwater • Give users clear entitlement to water. • Allow users to trade their entitlements • Restore over allocated systems • Effective water planning South Australia has made reasonable progress in implementing a number of its National Water Initiative commitments. South Australia has completed water plans for priority systems and has tradeable water access entitlements. The National Water Commission identified a number of areas requiring further attention in its Biennial Assessment of progress. • Dealing with over allocation • Better integrating the management of surface and groundwater resources and in relation to land use changes that intercept significant amounts of water • Improving water resource accounting and measurement to ensure that water is extracted, diverted, stored, traded and used in accordance with the conditions set out by water plans and defined in water access entitlements • Enhancing the compatibility of individual southern Murray-Darling Basin registers to support timely and low cost water trading transactions across irrigation area boundaries and state borders • Establishing arrangements for recovering costs of water planning and management. • Stronger pricing oversight arrangements that are presently among the weakest in Australia. Who Can We Blame? I know South Australians like to blame upstream irrigators for the problems they face. But the reality is there has been very little water for cotton or rice in the last couple of years. 3 Cubbie station can hardly be blamed when they have not taken water. Indeed, many irrigators in all States are watching their permanent plantings die because of insufficient water. While politicians like to blame other levels of Government, the reality is that our politicians reflect what we as a community are telling them. We are all responsible for the mess we find ourselves in. As a society we have been in denial about climate change for the last decade and we have chosen not to do anything much about it. We now live with the consequences and had better get used to it since we can’t turn back the clock. The present squabbles about carbon constraints will influence our climate 20-30 years out if we, as the human race, have the capacity to do anything. In the meantime we had better adapt to the world we have created. Securing Adelaide’s Water Supply The Needs of the City In 2004-5 Adelaide used 164 GL of water or about 406 litres per person per day, amongst the highest in the country. Each person used 273 litres of water each day in their homes, and a further 133 litres for commercial and open space uses. With much tighter water restrictions, and now some serious effort by SA Water to encourage water savings this will have reduced. Again, this was one of my 2004 recommendations. No Government yet seems to have been able to see the connection with rampant population growth and increasing water deficits. In 2005 the State’s population was 1.542 million, with 73% living in Adelaide. The South Australian Strategic Plan seeks to increase this to 1.64 million by 2014 and 2 million by 2050.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages10 Page
-
File Size-