THE ESC TEXTBOOK OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2nd edition 17 Spodick DH. Differential characteristics of the C h a p t e r 2 The Electrocardiogram electrocardiogram in early repolarization and acute pericarditis. N Engl J Med 1976; 295 : 523–6. Francisco G. Cosío, José Palacios, 18 Watanabe Y. Purkinje repolarization as a possible cause of the Agustín Pastor, and Ambrosio Núñez U wave in the electrocardiogram. Circulation 1975; 51 : 1030–7. 19 Voukydis PC. Effect of intracardiac blood on the electrocardiogram. N Engl J Med 1974; 291 : 612–16. 20 Thomas P, Dejong D. The P wave in the electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of heart disease. Br Heart J 1954; 16 : 241–54. References 21 Kaplan JD, Evans T Jr, Foster E, et al . Evaluation of electrocardiographic criteria for right atrial enlargement by 1 Grant RP. Clinical Electrocardiography: The Spatial Vector quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Approach , 1957. New York: McGraw Hill. Cardiol 1994; 23 : 747–52. 2 Sodi D, Bisteni A, Medrano G. Electrocardiografi a y 22 Reeves WC, Hallahan W, Schwitter EJ, et al . Two-dimensional Vectorcardiografi a Deductivas , Vol. I, 1964. México DF: La echocardiographic assessment of ECG criteria for right atrial Prensa Médica Mexicana. enlargement. Circulation 1981; 64 : 387–91. 3 Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Lazzari JO. The Hemiblocks , 1970. 23 Sgarbossa EB, Wagner G. Electrocardiography. In Topol EJ Oldsmar, FL: Tampa Tracings. (ed) Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 2007. Philadelphia, 4 Cranefi eld PF. The Conduction of the Cardiac Impulse , 1975. PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp.977–1011. Mount Kisko. NY: Futura. 24 Hazen MS, Marwick TH, Underwood DA. Diagnostic accuracy 5 McFarlane P, Veitch Lawrie TD. Comprehensive of the resting electrocardiogram in detection and estimation of Electrocardiography , 1989. Oxford: Pergamon Press. left atrial enlargement: an echocardiographic correlation in 551 6 Bayés de Luna A. Clinical Electrocardiography: A Textbook , patients. Am Heart J 1991; 122 : 823–8. 1993. Mount Kisko, NY: Futura, pp.450–9. 25 Scott CC, Leier CV, Kilman JW, et al . The effect of atrial 7 Surawicz B. Chou's Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice , 5 th histology and dimension on P wave morphology. J edn., 1996. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders. Electrocardiol 1983; 16 : 363–366. 8 Castellanos A Jr, Castillo CA, Agha AS. Contribution of His 26 Romhilt DW, Bove KE, Conrado S, et al . Morphologic bundle recordings to the understanding of clinical arrhythmias. signifi cance of left atrial involvement. Am Heart J 1972; 83 : Am J Cardiol 1971; 28 : 499–508. 322–327. 9 Gan-Xin Yan and Charles Antzelevitch. Cellular basis for the 27 Josephson ME, Kastorm JA, Morganroth J. Electrocardiographic normal T wave and the electrocardiographic manifestations of left atrial enlargement. Electrophysiologic, echocardiographic the long-QT syndrome. Circulation 1998; 98 : 1928–36. and hemodynamic correlates. Am J Cardiol 1977; 39 : 10 Working Group Report. Living anatomy of the atrioventricular 967–71. junctions. A guide to electrophysiologic mapping. A consensus 28 Heikila J, Luomanmaki K. Value of serial P wave changes in Statement from the Cardiac Nomenclature Study Group, indicating left heart failure in myocardial infarction. Br Heart J Working Group of Arrhythmias, European Society of 1970; 32 : 510–17. Cardiology, and the Task Force on Cardiac Nomenclature 29 Surawicz B. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of chamber from NASPE. Eur Heart J 1999; 20 : 1068–75. enlargement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8 : 711–24. 11 Durrer D, Dam R, Freud G, et al . Total excitation of the 30 Murphy ML, Thenabadu PN, De Soyza N, et al . Reevaluation isolated human heart. Circulation 1970; 41 : 899–912. of electrocardiographic criteria for left, right, and combined 12 Boineau JP, Canavan TE, Schuessler RB, et al . Demonstration cardiac ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53 : of a widely distributed atrial pacemaker complex in the human 1140–7. heart. Circulation 1988; 77 : 1221–37. 31 Sokolow M, Lyon T. The ventricular complex in left ventricular 13 De Ponti R, Ho SY, Salerno-Uriarte JA, et al . Electroanatomic hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limbs analysis of sinus impulse propagation in normal human atria. leads. Am Heart J 1949; 37 : 161–86. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002; 13 : 1–10. 32 Talbot S, Kilpatrick D. Diagnostic criteria for left 14 Cosío FG, Martín-Peñato A, Pastor A, et al . Atrial activation ventricular hypertrophy. In Mc Farlane PW (ed.) Progress in mapping in sinus rhythm in the clinical electrophysiology Electrocardiology , 1979. London: Pitman Medical, pp.534–41. laboratory. Observations in Bachmann’s bundle block. 33 Odom H, Davis JL, Dinh H, et al . QRS voltage measurements J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004; 15 : 524–31. in autopsied men free of cardiopulmonary disease: A basis 15 Kastor JA, Goldreyer BN, Moore EN, et al . Intraventricular for evaluating total QRS voltage as an index of left ventricular conduction in man studied with an endocardial electrode hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58 : 801–4. catheter mapping technique. Patients with normal QRS 34 Koito H, Spodick D. Electrocardiographic RV6 /RV5 voltage and right bundle branch block. Circulation 1975; 51 : 786–96. ratio for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 16 Wyndham CR, Meeran MK, Smith T, et al . Epicardial 1989; 63 : 352–61. activation of the intact human heart without conduction 35 Casale PN, Devereux RB, Alonso DR, et al . Improved sex- defect. Circulation 1979; 59 : 161–8. specifi c criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy for clinical and © 2009 The European Society of Cardiology THE ESC TEXTBOOK OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2nd edition computer interpretation of electrocardiograms: Validation with early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction with a cardiac autopsy fi ndings. Circulation 1987; 75 : 565–72. magnetic resonance imaging gold standard. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 Rodríguez Padial L. Usefulness of total 12-lead QRS voltage 2007; 50 : 1021–8. for determining the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy in 52 Boden WE, Kleiger RE, Gibson RS, et al . Electrocardiographic systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68 : 261–2. evolution of posterior acute myocardial infarction: importance 37 Romhilt D, Estes E. A point score system for the ECG diagnosis of early precordial ST-segment depression. Am J Cardiol 1987; of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1968; 75 : 752–8. 59 : 782–7. 38 Cabrera EC, Monroy JR. Systolic and diastolic overloading of 53 Birnbaum Y, Wagner GS, Barbash GI, et al . Correlation of the heart. I. Physiologic and clinical data. Am Heart J 1952; 43 : angiographic fi ndings and right (V1 to V3) versus left (V4 to 669–86. V6) precordial ST-segment depression in inferior wall acute 39 Holland R, Brooks H. TQ-ST segment mapping; Critical myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83 : 143–8. review and analysis of current concepts. Am J Cardiol 1977; 54 López-Sendón J, Coma-Canella I, Alcasena S, et al . 40 : 110–29. Electrocardiographic fi ndings in acute right ventricular 40 Kléber A, Janse MJ, Van Capelle FJ, et al . Mechanism and infarction: sensitivity and specifi city of electrocardiographic time course of S-T and T-Q segment changes during acute alterations in right precordial leads V4R, V3R, V1, V2 and V3. J regional myocardial ischemia in the pig heart determined by Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6 : 1273–9. extracellular and intracellular recordings. Circ Res 1978; 42 : 55 Barrabés JA, Figueras J, Moure C, et al . Prognostic value of lead 603–13. aVR in patients with a fi rst non-ST-elevation acute myocardial 41 Cinca J, Bardaji A, Figueras J, et al . Effects of regional infarction. Circulation 2003; 108 : 814–19. denervation on epicardial DC electrograms during coronary 56 Diderholm E, Angrén B, Frostfeldt G, et al . ST depression occlusion in pigs. Am J Physiol 1987; 253 ( Heart Circ Physiol in ECG at entry indicates severe coronary lesions and large 22): H138–H146. benefi ts of an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable 42 Braat SH, Brugada P, den Dulk K, et al . Value of lead V4R for coronary artery disease. The FRISC II ECG substudy. Eur Heart recognition of the infarct coronary artery in acute inferior J 2002; 23 : 141–7. myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53 : 1538–41. 57 Holmvang L, Clemmensen P, Lindahl B, et al . Quantitative 43 Hasdai D, Birnbaum Y, Herz I, et al . ST segment depression in analysis of the admission electrocardiogram identifi es lateral limb leads in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. patients with unstable coronary disease who benefi t the most Implications regarding the culprit artery and the site of from early invasive treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41 : obstruction. Eur Heart J 1995; 16 : 1549–53. 905–15. 44 Herz I, Assali AR, Adler Y, et al . New electrocardiographic 58 Savonitto S, Cohen M, Politti A, et al . Extent of ST-segment criteria for predicting either right or left circunfl ex artery as depression and cardiac events in non-ST segment elevation the culprit coronary artery in inferior wall acute myocardial acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2005; 26 : 2106–13. infarction. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80 : 1343–5. 59 Gardin JM, Isner JM, Ronan JA, et al . Pseucoischemic "false 45 Assali AR, Sclarovsky S, Herz I, et al . Comparison of patients positive" S-T segment changes induced by hyperventilation with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with versus in patients with mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1980; 45 : without ST segment elevation in leads V5 and V6. Am J Cardiol 952–8. 1998; 81 : 81–3. 60 Alexopoulos D, Christodoulou J, Toulgaridis T, et al . 46 Zimetbaum PJ, Josephson ME. Use of electrocardiogram in Repolarization abnormalities with prolonged hyperventilation acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 : 943–1040. in apparently healthy subjects: incidence, mechanisms and 47 Fiol M, Cygankiewicz I, Carrillo A, et al .