House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Exiting the EU: The financial settlement Forty-Eighth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 20 June 2018 HC 973 Published on 27 June 2018 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Bim Afolami MP (Conservative, Hitchin and Harpenden) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Martyn Day MP (Scottish National Party, Linlithgow and East Falkirk) Chris Evans MP (Labour (Co-op), Islwyn) Caroline Flint MP (Labour, Don Valley) Luke Graham MP (Conservative, Ochil and South Perthshire) Robert Jenrick MP (Conservative, Newark) Gillian Keegan MP (Conservative, Chichester) Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham, Ladywood) Layla Moran MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West and Abingdon) Stephen Morgan MP (Labour, Portsmouth South) Anne Marie Morris MP (Conservative, Newton Abbot) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Lee Rowley MP (Conservative, North East Derbyshire) Gareth Snell MP (Labour (Co-op), Stoke-on-Trent Central) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Richard Cooke (Clerk), Dominic Stockbridge (Second Clerk), Hannah Wentworth (Chair Liaison), Ameet Chudasama and Carolyn Bowes (Senior Committee Assistants), Zainab Balogun and Kutumya Kibedi (Committee Assistants), and Tim Bowden (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Committee of Public Accounts, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6593; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Exiting the EU: The financial setttlement 1 Contents Summary 3 Introduction 4 Conclusions and recommendations 5 1 The Treasury’s estimate of the financial settlement 8 Uncertainty of the financial settlement’s value 8 Determining the estimated range of the settlement 10 Settlement costs not included in the Treasury’s estimate 10 The timing of future settlement payments 12 2 Implementing the settlement 13 Skills needed to verify settlement payment requests 13 Reporting the wider potential costs and benefits of withdrawal 14 Formal minutes 16 Witnesses 17 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 18 Exiting the EU: The financial setttlement 3 Summary Overseeing the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union is one of the biggest challenges that has faced any government. The cost to the UK of leaving remains uncertain because it depends on future events, such as the UK’s economic growth. There is a risk that the amount the UK actually pays will fall outside the narrow range estimated by the Treasury of £35 billion to £39 billion. The Treasury’s estimate does not include at least £10 billion of costs to the government on leaving the European Union associated with the settlement deal, including nearly £3 billion of contributions towards the European Development Fund. It also does not include potentially significant costs associated with the UK’s future relationship with the EU. The taxpayer could continue to make payments for years to come. As new information becomes available the estimated value of the settlement may change. To have a meaningful Parliamentary vote on a withdrawal agreement later in 2018, Parliament and the taxpayer require an up-to-date estimate of the settlement’s costs, as well as better information on the wider potential costs of withdrawal. Without this, MPs and the taxpayer will not have complete information about the potential costs of the government’s deal with the EU. There is much talk of an EU dividend but our work has highlighted a number of as yet uncertain costs. Any dividend will be hard to calculate and, if it materialises, is some years away. 4 Exiting the EU: The financial setttlement Introduction The government is negotiating the terms of the UK’s withdrawal with the European Union (the EU). As part of this, the government intends to agree what the UK will pay towards the financial commitments and liabilities the EU entered into when the UK was a member state, known as the financial settlement. This will be part of the withdrawal agreement, alongside citizens’ rights and the impact on the Northern Ireland border. The government has stated that it aims for the settlement to be fair and in accordance with the law and spirit of a continuing partnership with the EU. HM Treasury (the Treasury), on behalf of the UK government, has been leading negotiations with the European Commission (the Commission) on the financial settlement. In December 2017, the government and the Commission published a joint report on the progress of negotiations on the UK’s withdrawal. This set out the principles they had agreed would underpin the financial settlement. In January 2018, the Treasury estimated that the value of the financial settlement would be between £35 billion and £39 billion. In March 2018, the government and the Commission set out further details on how the settlement will be calculated and paid, in a draft of the withdrawal agreement. Parliament will vote on the finalised withdrawal agreement, including the terms of the financial settlement, and a framework for the UK’s future relationship with the EU, in late 2018. The UK will then leave the EU on 29 March 2019. This is the Committee’s first examination of the financial settlement, which we will continue to watch closely. Exiting the EU: The financial setttlement 5 Conclusions and recommendations 1. The exact value of the financial settlement agreed between the UK and EU remains uncertain. The Treasury has reached agreement with the EU on how a settlement will be calculated that will see the UK honour commitments it has made while it was a member state. Based on published data, the Treasury estimates the settlement will cost the UK between £35 billion and £39 billion. However, there are a number of uncertainties in the estimate that will only become more certain as further information becomes available. The most significant uncertainty is the financing share, which will determine how much of the EU’s outstanding commitments and liabilities the UK will pay for after 2020. This will not be known until outturn Gross National Income figures for 2020 become available in 2022, when the final tally is made of the UK’s budget contributions to the EU over the period 2014 to 2020, compared with all member states’ contributions. Recommendation: The Treasury should write to the Committee providing an updated estimate of the settlement’s value before the Parliamentary summer 2018 recess, and then at least annually following any significant new data becoming available after the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. 2. The UK could be making settlement payments to the EU for many years. The Treasury estimates that 60% of the settlement will be paid by the end of 2021, but some payments could go on for many decades. Payments by the UK to meet the estimated £8.6 billion liability for its share of EU staff pensions and post-employment sickness benefits could last until at least 2064. The UK can negotiate with the Commission to settle the UK’s share of its pension and sickness benefits liabilities early, but assessing whether this is good value for money will require extensive cost-benefit analysis. The actual value of any early pay-off will be sensitive to the assumptions in the calculation to arrive at the present value of future payments among other factors, which will be determined by the EU. Recommendation: In response to this report, the Treasury should set out the factors it will take into account when deciding the value for money of settling the UK’s pension and post-employment sickness benefit liability early. 3. The Treasury’s estimate does not provide Parliament and the taxpayer with a sufficient understanding of the uncertainty attached to the settlement’s value. The Treasury believes that its estimate of the settlement value is “conservative and reasonable”. However, in making this estimate, the Treasury has undertaken limited analysis of the impact of changes to the assumptions on which the settlement estimate is based, considering the inherent uncertainty involved in forecasting future events. In particular, the Treasury did not account for the uncertainty associated with the UK’s financing share in its estimated range of the settlement. The Treasury told us that its primary concern was to publish an estimate that the Commission would agree to, meaning it could not deviate from published data. But this means that the estimated range of £35 billion to £39 billion is narrow given the degree of uncertainty about the settlement. While the Treasury told us that it has undertaken additional analysis beyond its published estimate, it did not tell us how likely it is that the settlement’s actual value will fall outside its estimated range. 6 Exiting the EU: The financial setttlement Recommendation: In responding to this report, the Treasury should provide the Committee with details of the sensitivity analysis it has performed on the £35 billion to £39 billion settlement value.